Railpage Australia™
  
No Clean Feed - Stop Internet Censorship in Australia
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!Mobile Edition
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/1
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

Yarra trams Hires 5 trams from France.

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Trams and Light Rail
Page 3 of 17   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 15, 16, 17  Next

Author Message
route14 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Dec 28, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
route14   
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:17 pm
but we have Bendigo.
 
s
bramt Chief Train Controller   Joined: Aug 30, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
bramt   
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:33 pm
And Hawthorn...

I really like the Mulhouse seat covers haha
 
s
Gwiwer Rt Hon Gentleman and Ghost of Oliver Bulleid   Joined: Nov 22, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
Location: Far away yet close at hand in images of elsewhere


contact

post
Gwiwer   
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:56 am
We do have museums where trams can be seen and in some cases ridden. Let's not forget Bylands either, nor Ballarat.

But Melbourne itself does not have a tramway museum other than half a former depot, packed so tight with trams it makes viewing and photography tricky, open once a month and virtually unknown outside the gunzel network.

Those trams also cannot do what they were built to, namely carry passengers from A to B.



Why MYKI? It isn't mine and it's not a key.

Ferroequinologist. BA Hons (Honourable Bachelor of Aquatarts )
The wise yet mysterious Sir Gwiwer Greybeard
 
s
Brendan03 Assistant Commissioner   Joined: May 19, 2005
Last Visited: Jan 6, 2009


contact

post
Brendan03   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:34 am
The low-floor trams have an advantage on the 96 because of the majority of platform stops between St Vincents Plaza and St Kilda Terminus - This allows faster loading and unloading than a B2 because of the wider doors and the ease of stroll-on/stroll-off - B2's have narrow doors and steps which take longer to get in and out of.

The Z1's were a good tram but they're just not suitable in this time; Their dwell times are too high. We need to be focussing on a fleet renewal - The main reason for keeping Z' class really in this time is only for mid-low traffic routes like the 78/79 (I can't say honestly how trafficable they are) but the 82 which doesn't go much past full-seating+a few standing.

This lease of trams is a great idea, It's gonna do wonders for Alstom in my oppinion; More than what the Combino plus did for Siemens - I just hope that Alstom or Yarra Trams have similar promotions than for the Combino plus (Keyrings, Postcards, Posters, Badges etc)

I can't wait to see these goregeous machines in (tr)action!

Citadis ftw!!!!

Brendan



Brendan Richards

Trawling Your Internet since 1995

Do you like cake?
 
s
Myrtone Chief Train Controller   Joined: Feb 13, 2007
Last Visited: Jan 6, 2009
Location: North Carlton, Melbourne, Victoria


contact

post
Myrtone   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:43 am
Brendan03 wrote:
The low-floor trams have an advantage on the 96 because of the majority of platform stops between St Vincents Plaza and St Kilda Terminus...


But Route 96 doesn't go through St. Vincents Plaza, that's 109.
 
s
michaelgreenhill Patron Saint of Alcohol Patron Saint of Alcohol
  Joined: Jan 17, 1985
Last Visited: Jan 5, 2009
Location: Lost Somewhere In Time


contact

post
michaelgreenhill   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:55 am
Myrtone wrote:
Brendan03 wrote:
The low-floor trams have an advantage on the 96 because of the majority of platform stops between St Vincents Plaza and St Kilda Terminus...


But Route 96 doesn't go through St. Vincents Plaza, that's 109.

And the survey says....wrong.

http://www.metlinkmelbourne.com.au/maps_stations_stops/metropolitan_trams/tram_96



Michael Greenhill
RP2 System Lord, RP3 Lead Developer
Rules for Posting | Help for Beginners | FAQ | Helpdesk

My photos on Flickr.

Railpage Australia
 
s
Myrtone Chief Train Controller   Joined: Feb 13, 2007
Last Visited: Jan 6, 2009
Location: North Carlton, Melbourne, Victoria


contact

post
Myrtone   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:18 pm
michaelgreenhill wrote:
Myrtone wrote:

But Route 96 doesn't go through St. Vincents Plaza, that's 109.

And the survey says....wrong.

http://www.metlinkmelbourne.com.au/maps_stations_stops/metropolitan_trams/tram_96


Strictly speaking, my point still stands. It does have a stop outside St Vincints Hospital, but the Plaza is between Gisboure and Brunswick Streets. Route 96 doesn't go through there, or is St Vincint's Plaza the name for the actual Hospital. Wikipedia admin and developer Tim Starling once had an operation there.
 
s
Natronomonas Train Controller   Joined: Jan 14, 2008
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
Natronomonas   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:19 pm
Quote:

But Route 96 doesn't go through St. Vincents Plaza, that's 109.
And the survey says....wrong.

http://www.metlinkmelbourne.com.au/maps_stations_stops/metropolitan_trams/tram_96


That map correctly shows the 96 stopping at St Vincent's Hospital, not St Vincent's Plaza. The 96 stops on the western, Nicholson St side of the Hospital, not the southeastern corner where the "St V's Plaza" mini-station is located.
The Nicholson St stop is a regular, no-platform stop.
 
s
Brendan03 Assistant Commissioner   Joined: May 19, 2005
Last Visited: Jan 6, 2009


contact

post
Brendan03   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:17 pm
That was a mistake on my behalf, Consider this a correction;

The platform stops are between Parliament Station (Corner Spring and Bourke Sts) and St Kilda Terminus with exception of Corner Spencer and Flinders Streets and Port Junction.



Brendan Richards

Trawling Your Internet since 1995

Do you like cake?
 
s
Riccardo Minister for Railways   Joined: Aug 20, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 5, 2009
Location: Elsewhere


contact

post
Riccardo   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:30 pm
Gwiwer wrote:
We do have museums where trams can be seen and in some cases ridden. Let's not forget Bylands either, nor Ballarat.

But Melbourne itself does not have a tramway museum other than half a former depot, packed so tight with trams it makes viewing and photography tricky, open once a month and virtually unknown outside the gunzel network.

Those trams also cannot do what they were built to, namely carry passengers from A to B.


I'll state again for the benefit of the others - we have no Loftus

We have no Ferny Grove, we don't even have a Bennett Brook.

Bylands is hardly known and is not comprehensive. There's supposed to be something at Haddon but again not the full quid. Hawthorn, as you've said Gwiwer, has some distance to go.

Ballarat and Bendigo are primarily there to preserve their respective cars - which have no connection with Melbourne (and more connection with each other historically)

And where are the cable trams? And the horse trams?



If you need to get in touch, drop a comment at the Transport Textbook or on my blog.
 
s
The Met Chief Commissioner   Joined: Sep 30, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 2, 2009
Location: 37.55-S /145.01-E


contact

post
The Met   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:59 pm
Portland?!

But not in true authentic style unfortunately.



"People are pretty much alike. It's only that our differences are more susceptible to definition than our similarities." - Linda Ellerbee
 
s
GeoffreyHansen Minister for Railways   Joined: Apr 13, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 22, 2008
Location: Waiting for the next commuter service to Bathurst


contact

post
GeoffreyHansen   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:44 pm
Riccardo wrote:

And where are the cable trams? And the horse trams?


It would be good to see a proper cable tramway running in Victoria.



Bring the 3900s back to Brisbane
Bring Karlsruhe Tramtrains to Australian cities
Extend the proposed Metro to Taylor Square
Extend the Gold Coast line to the Tweed
 
s
route14 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Dec 28, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
route14   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:56 pm
Ideally along Beaconsfield Pde.
 
s
standard_gauge Dr Beeching   Joined: Apr 13, 2004
Last Visited: Oct 26, 2008
Location: Outside the toilet, waiting for Della Bosca to come out !!


contact

post
standard_gauge   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:18 pm
By the way..anyone check out information about this town Mulhouse?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulhouse

Check out the CORRECT way to prounce this town! it's quite interesting!

(I thought it was Milhouse, like a character from the Simpsons...but noooo-bingooo)

And not much info about the tram services there online..



Hey?..whatever happen to my warning level?
 
s
Myrtone Chief Train Controller   Joined: Feb 13, 2007
Last Visited: Jan 6, 2009
Location: North Carlton, Melbourne, Victoria


contact

post
Myrtone   
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:43 pm
standard_gauge wrote:
Check out the CORRECT way to prounce this town! it's quite interesting!


Here it is in the International Phonetic alphabet (IPA); [myluz]

standard_gauge wrote:
(I thought it was Milhouse, like a character from the Simpsons...but noooo-bingooo)


Actually its German name (Mülhausen) does in fact mean house of mills. In Alsatian, the form is Milhüsa or Milhüse, both pronounced [mɪlˈyːzə].
 


Last edited by Myrtone on Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:15 pm; edited 1 time in total
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Trams and Light Rail
Page 3 of 17  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 15, 16, 17  Next

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You cannot post new threads in this forum
You cannot reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©


[ switch to normal layout ]

Comments are property of their posters
© 2003-2009 Interactive Omnimedia

Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2009 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.380 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.08%