Railpage Australia™
  
No Clean Feed - Stop Internet Censorship in Australia
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!Mobile Edition
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/1
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

Freight Line on hold?

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> New South Wales
Page 4 of 11   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9, 10, 11  Next

Author Message
FieldShunt74 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009


contact

post
FieldShunt74   
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:17 pm
I think it's fair enough to give diesel propelled passenger trains (not just Clink but also the tour operators) access to the SSFL when there are problems with the RailCorp network or simply when it is convenient to do so. I'd also expect the reverse to apply, if the SSFL is out of action then the freight trains should be accommodated as best they can by RailCorp.

Freight / Passenger priority on the SSFL should be considered case by case to get the best result. There's no point in saying that freight gets absolute priority on the SSFL. Imagine the mentality of refuging the XPT on the SSFL to run a freighter past only to get down the road somewhere past Macarthur and put the freight away for the now late XPT. The reverse applies too, of course. You need a consistent and coordinated approach from both sides of the border. The current management of interaction between pass and freight probably leaves a lot to be desired. We should try to improve that everywhere, not start a tit for tat on the SSFL.
 
s
cootanee Chief Train Controller   Joined: Apr 28, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
cootanee   
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:39 pm
BDA wrote:
Actually there has been a fair sprinkling of hairy legs along that corridor recently .


What were they up to? I can't say I notice much difference day to day (apart from works done around Railcorp resleepering).

Plenty of undergrowth to clear - maybe they could start with that Wink Wink
 
s
cootanee Chief Train Controller   Joined: Apr 28, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
cootanee   
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 3:41 pm
"THE Southern Sydney Freight Line will be "the end of the world", a long-time Cabramatta resident says."

http://www.fairfieldadvance.com.au/article/2008/05/07/3504_news.html
 
s
luznug Train Controller   Joined: Jan 22, 2005
Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009


contact

post
luznug   
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 5:31 pm
It reads like a car lobby yarn.
More car parks is the pay back.
i would hope trees, trees more trees to cover over those unsightly sound barriers would be better.
The quote about trains and drugs is great too! Drunk
 
s
awsgc24 Minister for Railways   Joined: Feb 18, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 10, 2009
Location: Sydney, NSW


contact

post
awsgc24   
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 8:15 pm
AFAIK, at Cabramatta station, the SSFL will be underground together with a spare tunnel for a future underground platform that is part of a planned grade separation of CityRail tracks. Once built, roads and parking could presumably be put on the roof of the tunnel. provided of course that the roof is built with enough strength.

Noise walls can be see-through or non-see-through depending on requirements.

At the moment freight trains travel at night because of the curfew during passenger peaks. With the SSFL some of these trains can travel during the day, easing the burden on neighbours who are kept awake by train nose.

Alternately, we could build the line through Milperra and the triangle at Belmore to connect Bankstown directly with Liverpool.
 
s
Oldfart Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 01, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009
Location: Right base for BK 11R


contact

post
Oldfart   
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:07 pm
An odd article. National Street is parallel to, but a street away, from the line. I can't see how they would have of a view of the line to start with. The SSFL will also mean more freight will pass the area during peak commuting hours than at odd hours of the day or night, so it should actually improve the situation for residents. Essentially it provides a path for freight at times when the main lines are jammed with Cityrail services.

I was at the Cabra SSFL meeting held by ARTC. Unless things have changed, the preferred option was for it to run on the surface just to the east of the station with excavation done underneath to provide for an extra underground platform fed by an underpass from the down Via Granville track (Railcorp have it scheduled for 2012 IIRC). Sound barriers are planned for along the residential areas, but not through the station area itself.

The alternative of running the SSFL underground through Cabra would mean it would need to be constructed under the existing roadway to the east by 'cut and cover'. This would mean shutting down all the access and shops in that area for at least a year. (Something the local pollies conveniently forget to tell the residents!). There would also be issues constructing exhaust stacks for the tunnel and complicated dangers from underground incidents involving derailments or spill/leaks of hazardous freight. All in all, the surface option is much cheaper, less obstructive and easier to operate; but some parking is lost.

At the meeting, the local pollies left it to the last minute to make their grand pronouncements, so no-one could challenge their validity. Essentially they convinced some of the locals that all the tracks running through Cabra could be sunk below ground level so the "visual amenity" of Cabramatta (now there's a contradiction in terms) could be restored to its former glory. If the main game is now "just give us some more parking to compensate us for the extra track, then that would not be unrealistic".



A man of great genius makes no mistakes; his errors are volitional and become the portals of discovery (James Joyce).
 
s
bobcarey Assistant Commissioner   Joined: Jun 19, 2004
Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009
Location: offrail


contact

post
bobcarey   
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Just a question on the funding for this project, whether it is already part of committed funds from past grants or whatever, or will it rely on the Federal budget coming up ? Already the delays mean that costs have gone up , at least by CPI, and climbing materials cost.
Bob
 
s
cootanee Chief Train Controller   Joined: Apr 28, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
cootanee   
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 9:18 am
bobcarey wrote:
Just a question on the funding for this project, whether it is already part of committed funds from past grants or whatever, or will it rely on the Federal budget coming up ? Already the delays mean that costs have gone up , at least by CPI, and climbing materials cost.
Bob


My understanding is ARTC is funding through borrowings (read this in various sources). There are some NSW Gov funds for enabling works ($20m). At no point have I seen 'free' Fed funds committed to it (unlike the M7 although this is a rail equivalent). Sad Sad

One would think that the cost of funds has increased dramatically given the global/local funds crisis. Infrastructure resources are a continuing constraint.

I though a tender would have been announced by now given they want to start June/July Confused Confused Confused
 
s
MD Assistant Commissioner   Joined: Dec 10, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
Location: Canbera


contact

post
MD   
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:10 am
One of the conditions of the NSW lease that ARTC had to comply with was that they spend $820 million on the parts of the NSW network that was included in the lease.
None of this money came from the Feds, Its all borrowed and has to be paid back.
 
s
Oldfart Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 01, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009
Location: Right base for BK 11R


contact

post
Oldfart   
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:27 am
cootanee wrote:


My understanding is ARTC is funding through borrowings (read this in various sources). There are some NSW Gov funds for enabling works ($20m). At no point have I seen 'free' Fed funds committed to it (unlike the M7 although this is a rail equivalent).


Yes, that's what they said at the briefing. They're getting what is essentially a business loan from a bank and will pay it back from the income they get from operators that use ARTC tracks. They've had seed funding from government to get the organisation itself up and running, just as a private company gets initial funding from the sale of shares; but ARTC operates more like a private company than a government entity. The SSFL is basically a commercial proposition, it's meant to be paid for by those who will use it.



A man of great genius makes no mistakes; his errors are volitional and become the portals of discovery (James Joyce).
 
s
Speed Chief Commissioner   Joined: Mar 19, 2007
Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009


contact

post
Speed   
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:59 am
luznug wrote:
The quote about trains and drugs is great too!

You should have included that quote:
Quote:
National St resident Michelle Costa, said the project would divide the community. "I've lived here all my life," she said. "First we had the drug problem. Now we have the trains."

emphasis added!

I suspect that her namesake perceives trains similarly.
 
s
arctic Train Controller   Joined: Apr 26, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009


contact

post
arctic   
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 5:46 pm
cootanee wrote:
Bit by bit...

"This bill proposes the revocation of a small area of land from Leacock Regional Park, which is located at Casula in south-west Sydney. The revocation is to allow for the construction of the Southern Sydney Freight Line."

http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LA20080305040


This legislation apparently now passed on the 14th of May.

http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/PARLMENT/nswbills.nsf/131a07fa4b8a041cca256e610012de17/cc0e5e500624a129ca2574020015da51!OpenDocument

Can they start next month as noted on the ARTC website?
 
s
cootanee Chief Train Controller   Joined: Apr 28, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
cootanee   
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 1:28 pm
arctic wrote:


This legislation apparently now passed on the 14th of May.

http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/PARLMENT/nswbills.nsf/131a07fa4b8a041cca256e610012de17/cc0e5e500624a129ca2574020015da51!OpenDocument

Can they start next month as noted on the ARTC website?


Have the following occurred yet?

1. Approval from the federal Minister for Environment and Water Resources

2. The successful Tender been announced
 
s
arctic Train Controller   Joined: Apr 26, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009


contact

post
arctic   
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 2:31 pm
Don't know on the above but the Federal Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts has been yakking to the locals. Though this time the article reads like the line will be going ahead.

http://www.fairfieldadvance.com.au/article/2008/05/21/3555_news.html

Quote:
Community concern tracked

Wednesday 21 May, 2008 12:01am

THE last time Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett listened to local noise complaints at Cabramatta was as Midnight Oil's frontman rocking Sweethearts (now the Stardust Hotel).

Two decades on, he listened to community concerns over the $200 million, 36km Southern Sydney Freight Line, earmarked to run through suburbs including Cabramatta, Carramar, Canley Vale and Villawood. The line will be built alongside the existing corridor between Macarthur and Sefton.

The Australian Rail Track Corporation's (ARTC) project has sparked concerns over noise, the amount of parking it would consume and the 4m noise barrier becoming a magnet for graffiti.

Community figures told the Fairfield Advance they were pleased with the meeting which was held in Canberra on Thursday.

Blaxland Federal Labor MP Jason Clare, Fowler Federal Labor MP Julia Irwin, Fairfield Mayor Nick Lalich and Cabramatta Chamber of Commerce president John Medich were part of the delegation.

Mr Clare said a key issue raised with Mr Garrett was the need for a compensation fund that would be used for parking at the east side of the railway line. A request for noise-mitigation measures, particularly for residents of Prospect Rd, Canley Vale, and graffiti deterrence was also expressed.

"If we're going to have a noise wall, it's important to have trees planted in front of it because you can't graffiti trees," Mr Clare said.

Fairfield Mayor Nick Lalich asked for the line to be lowered to reduce noise, but the suggestion was quickly derailed. The corporation says it would cost about $40 million to build a tunnel or lower the line.

Cr Lalich also asked for a transparent plastic barrier, so views would not be blocked and the community would not be divided.
 
s
42101 NSW's Nasty one   Joined: Oct 12, 2005
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009
Location: I'm here


contact

post
42101   
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 2:41 pm
What a crock they want a transperant noise barrier Laughing Laughing for the veiws of this area Laughing Laughing Laughing what bloody veiws,streets,houses,shops thats all there is to see there.
Going to be a funny line if these reports are factual with the line going Cabra/Carramar (a S hole of a place)then back to Canley vale then to villawood eh great journo reporting yet again. Rolling Eyes



Thanks heaps to ALL my friends on here.
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> New South Wales
Page 4 of 11  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You cannot post new threads in this forum
You cannot reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©


[ switch to normal layout ]

Comments are property of their posters
© 2003-2009 Interactive Omnimedia

Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2009 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.290 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.30%