| home |
|
| news |
|
| discussions |
|
| content |
|
| site |
|
|
| technical support | Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!
Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.donation  Please Donate!photo comp Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?
Click Here!
Voting Closes 31/1search |
| |
| Author |
Message |
FieldShunt74
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Nov 06, 2004 Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
| FieldShunt74 |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:17 pm
|
I think it's fair enough to give diesel propelled passenger trains (not just Clink but also the tour operators) access to the SSFL when there are problems with the RailCorp network or simply when it is convenient to do so. I'd also expect the reverse to apply, if the SSFL is out of action then the freight trains should be accommodated as best they can by RailCorp.
Freight / Passenger priority on the SSFL should be considered case by case to get the best result. There's no point in saying that freight gets absolute priority on the SSFL. Imagine the mentality of refuging the XPT on the SSFL to run a freighter past only to get down the road somewhere past Macarthur and put the freight away for the now late XPT. The reverse applies too, of course. You need a consistent and coordinated approach from both sides of the border. The current management of interaction between pass and freight probably leaves a lot to be desired. We should try to improve that everywhere, not start a tit for tat on the SSFL.
|
|
 |
cootanee
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Apr 28, 2006 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
cootanee
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Apr 28, 2006 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
luznug
Train Controller
Joined: Jan 22, 2005 Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 5:31 pm
|
It reads like a car lobby yarn.
More car parks is the pay back.
i would hope trees, trees more trees to cover over those unsightly sound barriers would be better.
The quote about trains and drugs is great too!
|
|
 |
awsgc24
Minister for Railways
Joined: Feb 18, 2003 Last Visited: Jan 10, 2009 Location: Sydney, NSW
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 8:15 pm
|
AFAIK, at Cabramatta station, the SSFL will be underground together with a spare tunnel for a future underground platform that is part of a planned grade separation of CityRail tracks. Once built, roads and parking could presumably be put on the roof of the tunnel. provided of course that the roof is built with enough strength.
Noise walls can be see-through or non-see-through depending on requirements.
At the moment freight trains travel at night because of the curfew during passenger peaks. With the SSFL some of these trains can travel during the day, easing the burden on neighbours who are kept awake by train nose.
Alternately, we could build the line through Milperra and the triangle at Belmore to connect Bankstown directly with Liverpool.
|
|
 |
Oldfart
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009 Location: Right base for BK 11R
contact
|
post
|
|
| Oldfart |
|
 |
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:07 pm
|
An odd article. National Street is parallel to, but a street away, from the line. I can't see how they would have of a view of the line to start with. The SSFL will also mean more freight will pass the area during peak commuting hours than at odd hours of the day or night, so it should actually improve the situation for residents. Essentially it provides a path for freight at times when the main lines are jammed with Cityrail services.
I was at the Cabra SSFL meeting held by ARTC. Unless things have changed, the preferred option was for it to run on the surface just to the east of the station with excavation done underneath to provide for an extra underground platform fed by an underpass from the down Via Granville track (Railcorp have it scheduled for 2012 IIRC). Sound barriers are planned for along the residential areas, but not through the station area itself.
The alternative of running the SSFL underground through Cabra would mean it would need to be constructed under the existing roadway to the east by 'cut and cover'. This would mean shutting down all the access and shops in that area for at least a year. (Something the local pollies conveniently forget to tell the residents!). There would also be issues constructing exhaust stacks for the tunnel and complicated dangers from underground incidents involving derailments or spill/leaks of hazardous freight. All in all, the surface option is much cheaper, less obstructive and easier to operate; but some parking is lost.
At the meeting, the local pollies left it to the last minute to make their grand pronouncements, so no-one could challenge their validity. Essentially they convinced some of the locals that all the tracks running through Cabra could be sunk below ground level so the "visual amenity" of Cabramatta (now there's a contradiction in terms) could be restored to its former glory. If the main game is now "just give us some more parking to compensate us for the extra track, then that would not be unrealistic".
A man of great genius makes no mistakes; his errors are volitional and become the portals of discovery (James Joyce).
|
|
 |
bobcarey
Assistant Commissioner
Joined: Jun 19, 2004 Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009 Location: offrail
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 7:24 pm
|
Just a question on the funding for this project, whether it is already part of committed funds from past grants or whatever, or will it rely on the Federal budget coming up ? Already the delays mean that costs have gone up , at least by CPI, and climbing materials cost.
Bob
|
|
 |
cootanee
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Apr 28, 2006 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
MD
Assistant Commissioner
Joined: Dec 10, 2003 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009 Location: Canbera
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:10 am
|
One of the conditions of the NSW lease that ARTC had to comply with was that they spend $820 million on the parts of the NSW network that was included in the lease.
None of this money came from the Feds, Its all borrowed and has to be paid back.
|
|
 |
Oldfart
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Jan 01, 2006 Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009 Location: Right base for BK 11R
contact
|
post
|
|
| Oldfart |
|
 |
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:27 am
|
| cootanee wrote: |
My understanding is ARTC is funding through borrowings (read this in various sources). There are some NSW Gov funds for enabling works ($20m). At no point have I seen 'free' Fed funds committed to it (unlike the M7 although this is a rail equivalent). |
Yes, that's what they said at the briefing. They're getting what is essentially a business loan from a bank and will pay it back from the income they get from operators that use ARTC tracks. They've had seed funding from government to get the organisation itself up and running, just as a private company gets initial funding from the sale of shares; but ARTC operates more like a private company than a government entity. The SSFL is basically a commercial proposition, it's meant to be paid for by those who will use it.
A man of great genius makes no mistakes; his errors are volitional and become the portals of discovery (James Joyce).
|
|
 |
Speed
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Mar 19, 2007 Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
| Speed |
|
 |
Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 10:59 am
|
| luznug wrote: | | The quote about trains and drugs is great too! |
You should have included that quote:
| Quote: | | National St resident Michelle Costa, said the project would divide the community. "I've lived here all my life," she said. "First we had the drug problem. Now we have the trains." |
emphasis added!
I suspect that her namesake perceives trains similarly.
|
|
 |
arctic
Train Controller
Joined: Apr 26, 2006 Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
cootanee
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Apr 28, 2006 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 1:28 pm
|
Have the following occurred yet?
1. Approval from the federal Minister for Environment and Water Resources
2. The successful Tender been announced
|
|
 |
arctic
Train Controller
Joined: Apr 26, 2006 Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
| arctic |
|
 |
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 2:31 pm
|
Don't know on the above but the Federal Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts has been yakking to the locals. Though this time the article reads like the line will be going ahead.
http://www.fairfieldadvance.com.au/article/2008/05/21/3555_news.html
| Quote: | Community concern tracked
Wednesday 21 May, 2008 12:01am
THE last time Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett listened to local noise complaints at Cabramatta was as Midnight Oil's frontman rocking Sweethearts (now the Stardust Hotel).
Two decades on, he listened to community concerns over the $200 million, 36km Southern Sydney Freight Line, earmarked to run through suburbs including Cabramatta, Carramar, Canley Vale and Villawood. The line will be built alongside the existing corridor between Macarthur and Sefton.
The Australian Rail Track Corporation's (ARTC) project has sparked concerns over noise, the amount of parking it would consume and the 4m noise barrier becoming a magnet for graffiti.
Community figures told the Fairfield Advance they were pleased with the meeting which was held in Canberra on Thursday.
Blaxland Federal Labor MP Jason Clare, Fowler Federal Labor MP Julia Irwin, Fairfield Mayor Nick Lalich and Cabramatta Chamber of Commerce president John Medich were part of the delegation.
Mr Clare said a key issue raised with Mr Garrett was the need for a compensation fund that would be used for parking at the east side of the railway line. A request for noise-mitigation measures, particularly for residents of Prospect Rd, Canley Vale, and graffiti deterrence was also expressed.
"If we're going to have a noise wall, it's important to have trees planted in front of it because you can't graffiti trees," Mr Clare said.
Fairfield Mayor Nick Lalich asked for the line to be lowered to reduce noise, but the suggestion was quickly derailed. The corporation says it would cost about $40 million to build a tunnel or lower the line.
Cr Lalich also asked for a transparent plastic barrier, so views would not be blocked and the community would not be divided. |
|
|
 |
42101
NSW's Nasty one
Joined: Oct 12, 2005 Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009 Location: I'm here
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
|
You cannot post new threads in this forum You cannot reply to threads in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group
Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
|
|