| home |
|
| news |
|
| discussions |
|
| content |
|
| site |
|
|
| technical support | Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!
Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.donation  Please Donate!photo comp Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?
Click Here!
Voting Closes 30/9search |
| |
| Author |
Message |
bevans
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 11, 2003 Last Visited: Sep 5, 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:14 pm
|
RIO Tinto will purchase ore from a junior explorer as the mining giant seeks to prevent third parties gaining access to its railway in Western Australia.
The world's second-largest iron ore producer has agreed to purchase the steelmaking product from Iron Ore Holdings Ltd's (IOH) Phils Creek mine, 90 km from Newman in the Pilbara region of WA.
"It demonstrates our preferred alternative to the growing demands from government and industry for access to our rail infrastructure," Rio Tinto iron ore chief executive Sam Walsh said in a statement.
Junior iron ore companies led by Fortescue Metals Group Ltd are seeking access to Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton Ltd's railways in the Pilbara to export the steel-making commodity amid rising prices for the commodity.
IOH shares gained 4.5 cents, or 7.89 per cent to 61.5 cents by 1534 AEST, while Rio Tinto dropped $4.11 to $115.99.
The National Competition Council (NCC) last month called for public comment on its draft recommendation that three separate railways owned by the majors be opened for access by third parties to improve competition in the haulage market for iron ore.
The NCC will make its final recommendations to Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan following the public submission period.
Under the agreement with Rio Tinto, IOH will deliver the ore to the Yandicoogina stockyard where Rio Tinto would take ownership and transport it for sale to customers.
IOH's Phils Creek project is still in the feasibility stage but it is envisaged the operation would produce about 1.5 million tonnes of iron ore per year.
"This commercial agreement represents an excellent opportunity for Rio Tinto to gain access to extra tonnage and, importantly, in a way that does not jeopardise the efficiency of our fully integrated production system," Mr Walsh said.
Melbourne Herald-Sun
RP2 - Project Director
"Victoria, the home of world class project blowouts and overruns" Mr. Bachelor, hang your head in Shame!
|
|
 |
Controller
Assistant Commissioner
Joined: Sep 04, 2004 Last Visited: Sep 5, 2008 Location: Port Hedland W.A.
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 4:15 pm
|
A smart move by both Rio and IOH......a win-win situation.
Why waste good money trying to fight the big multi-nationals....you never win.
All gave some, Some gave all
|
|
 |
awsgc24
Minister for Railways
Joined: Feb 18, 2003 Last Visited: Sep 7, 2008 Location: Sydney, NSW
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 5:11 pm
|
|
And at what price will the third party ore be bought at?
|
|
 |
Controller
Assistant Commissioner
Joined: Sep 04, 2004 Last Visited: Sep 5, 2008 Location: Port Hedland W.A.
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:09 pm
|
who gives a hoot, as long as both parties have come to an amicable arrangement
All gave some, Some gave all
|
|
 |
awsgc24
Minister for Railways
Joined: Feb 18, 2003 Last Visited: Sep 7, 2008 Location: Sydney, NSW
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:14 pm
|
| Controller wrote: | who gives a hoot, as long as both parties have come to an amicable arrangement  |
As RIO would have the upper hand, amicable agreements would not necessarily follow. That's the problem.
|
|
 |
PILBARAMAN
Locomotive Driver
Joined: Feb 03, 2007 Last Visited: Sep 6, 2008 Location: PILBARA
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:00 pm
|
|
They have signed a contract to sell their Ore,they will make money simply because Rio and themselves are splitting the difference between them hauling it to Rios Rail and then Rio hauling to the port,they would both be making decent money at current prices,and when you look at infrastructure costs it was mostly likely the best scenario and amicable.
|
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
|
You cannot post new threads in this forum You cannot reply to threads in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group
Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
|
|