| home |
|
| news |
|
| discussions |
|
| content |
|
| site |
|
|
| technical support | Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!
Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.donation  Please Donate!photo comp Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?
Click Here!
Voting Closes 31/1search |
| |
| Author |
Message |
simont141
Chief Commissioner
Joined: May 12, 2003 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009 Location: Adelaide
contact
|
post
|
|
| simont141 |
|
 |
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 2:03 am
|
| simont141 wrote: | T224 and Rx224
T251 and F251
G1, SMC/NJAB1, NC1, GM1, ETSA 1. One more (hint: it's in NT).
3 more numbers, 7 locos. |
Surely this Question isn't that hard .
2 of the numbers are single digit, the other is double. Each of these numbers only has 2 locos with that numbers. There is one "1" left.
|
|
 |
lustychant
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Feb 02, 2008 Last Visited: Jan 1, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:48 am
|
Ok then I'll add a few more .
How could we forget Na 1 (Sandfly, Darwin).
CB1 (NRM) - Do railcars count?
MDH1 F.J.Shea (now ETSA 2, Homestead Park Pt Augusta), then to match the ETSA number GM2 (NRM)
Nf5 (Pine Creek, formerly W53) and Rx5 (Kapunda), and then to match the SAR number NSU 53, GPS Alice Springs.
Nf6 (In Darwin Harbour, formerly W54) and NDH6 (Adelaide River, once again if railcars count) and then to match the SAR number NSU 54 PRR.
Rx 55 (Loxton) and NSU 55 (Steamtown).
I'm sure there must be more...
|
|
 |
simont141
Chief Commissioner
Joined: May 12, 2003 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009 Location: Adelaide
contact
|
post
|
|
| simont141 |
|
 |
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:05 pm
|
You've covered all but one that I was thinking of. But I can understand that some people might not agree ... GM3 and BHP No. 3. GM3 you could argue is preserved in a similar way to GM 1.
Go for it lustychant, your question.
|
|
 |
lustychant
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Feb 02, 2008 Last Visited: Jan 1, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
lustychant
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Feb 02, 2008 Last Visited: Jan 1, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 9:39 am
|
All right then, W25 (NRM) and NM25 (PRR).
Floor is open guys.
|
|
 |
lustychant
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Feb 02, 2008 Last Visited: Jan 1, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:52 pm
|
OK then, here's an interesting question (s) -
1 - What government system other than the SAR has had the greatest number of individual locos to travel over the SAR Broad Gauge.
2 - What was the class with greatest number of individual units to travel over the SAR BG.
|
|
 |
GrahamJ
Junior Train Controller
Joined: Sep 23, 2007 Last Visited: Dec 21, 2008 Location: Glandore
contact
|
post
|
|
| GrahamJ |
|
 |
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:51 pm
|
Must be a trick here but her goes...
1. VIC
2. Rx - 54
Graham
|
|
 |
Alco_Haulic
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Jul 28, 2004 Last Visited: Dec 16, 2008 Location: Eating out...
contact
|
post
|
|
| Alco_Haulic |
|
 |
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:44 pm
|
1- Victorian Railways.
2- The A2 class had the most members, and would have run into both Mt Gambier, and Servicton.
|
|
 |
simont141
Chief Commissioner
Joined: May 12, 2003 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009 Location: Adelaide
contact
|
post
|
|
| simont141 |
|
 |
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 8:34 pm
|
VR
N Class? (750)
|
|
 |
lustychant
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Feb 02, 2008 Last Visited: Jan 1, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:54 pm
|
Just to clear something up, both questions relate to true 'foreign' locos.
I wasn't trying to be too tricky with this one and to be fair to Alco_Haulic I didn't consider Mt Gambier (or Pinnaroo) when considering the question. Did the A2's ever work to Mt Gambier or was their axle load too high for the Dartmoor Bridge? If we then considered that area VR-V/line would be the winner including (at least) the D/K/J steam and T/Y DE's. I was considering locos that travelled a reasonable distance in SA.
As for Question 1,
VR - X (10), C (10), G (10?), N (25), S (17), B (11), A (11) plus DD (superheater trials in 1918), N432? (Jubilee Train 1951), K190, R761, R766
Total - 99
One system, if you agree with the figures above, had 120 (99% sure). edit between 120 and 160.
Second (and I stand to be corrected on this , in fact I welcome your help with both this and the previous answer ) had 109.
Third - VR-V/line with 99.
Forth place had 53.
It's difficult to find out this info so please cut me some slack with this question .
As for question 2, it's not a VR-V/Line class
Last edited by lustychant on Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:40 am; edited 1 time in total
|
|
 |
GrahamJ
Junior Train Controller
Joined: Sep 23, 2007 Last Visited: Dec 21, 2008 Location: Glandore
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
lustychant
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Feb 02, 2008 Last Visited: Jan 1, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
lustychant
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Feb 02, 2008 Last Visited: Jan 1, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
GrahamJ
Junior Train Controller
Joined: Sep 23, 2007 Last Visited: Dec 21, 2008 Location: Glandore
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
Pressman
Chief Commissioner
Joined: May 23, 2006 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009 Location: anywhere between Glenbawn and Pemberton
contact
|
post
|
|
| Pressman |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:24 pm
|
|
I'll try for the Commonwealth Railways (CR) as a far percentage of their locos would have been transferred via the SAR BG (delivery runs)
Cheers,
Tony
Still drying out the falcoon after the now imfamous creek incident!http://tony33.fotopic.net
|
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
|
You cannot post new threads in this forum You cannot reply to threads in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group
Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
|
|