| home |
|
| news |
|
| discussions |
|
| content |
|
| site |
|
|
| technical support | Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!
Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.donation  Please Donate!photo comp Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?
Click Here!
Voting Closes 31/1search |
| |
| Author |
Message |
fast01
BUTTSCRATCHER!
Joined: Sep 01, 2004 Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009 Location: Reloading
contact
|
post
|
|
| fast01 |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:44 pm
|
Going on Dthead's advice here: [url] http://www.railpage.com.au/f-t11326362-s405.htm[/url]
| t_woodroffe wrote: | | Quote: |
Ya got ya story back to front, SRHC have the correct shades of blue and gold.
|
I didn't get any story from anyone or anywhere. I am stating fact. On what basis do you make the claim that SRHC have the correct shades of blue and gold? I can prove my statement.
TW | Go ahead and prove all you wish, as we all know how historically accurate the paint on SRV's stock is, take a look at S313, R711, the BRS's in Red/Yellow/, L1162.
The SRHC went to great efforts to determine the correct shades of Blue/Gold for latest repaints, you want proof? There are many that can provide it.
|
|
 |
rjcas
SprogMasterZer0
Joined: Dec 16, 2004 Last Visited: Dec 29, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
| rjcas |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:05 pm
|
Going on what VBAndy is saying, this was actually true, Locos were painted across Victoria so there was no Actual uniform VR shade Blue and Gold, even the logo shape and size varied too. Take S303 as an example, the logo on it when it came out was pretty much the same as the B's (Nitpicking I know but there are some small differences in the letters).
Going on what the Rev was asking, this was asked as the Yarra Valley Tourist Railway has an association with the SRHC, so I'm guessing a few hints and tips may have been swapped here and there between the groups... As most have seen, T341 was painted up at the SRHC using the same paints used on S303, B74 and T378.
Originally no one was saying that the SRV shades of paints were wrong... No one originally said that the SRHC paints were the true VR shades of blue and yellow, this was only a false assumption by you TW...
As I said, don't start this argument and play the victim later...
Gone to the Pub... I'll be home tomorrow night....

|
|
 |
t_woodroffe
Junior Train Controller
Joined: Aug 22, 2006 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:13 pm
|
| Quote: |
as we all know how historically accurate the paint on SRV's stock is, take a look at S313, R711, the BRS's in Red/Yellow/, L1162
|
Irrelevant. I stated T 356 none of the above.| Quote: |
There are many that can provide it.
|
Front and centre. How did SRHC establish the (alledged) veracity of their gold? Taking samples off C 501? Pity Clyde Engineering got the polyurethane shade of gold on the C Class wrong .....
I have ex Newport paint shop swatches from enamel matching VR specification.
As an aside take a look at a slide/print of an F Class 0-6-0 circa 1960 and see how the gold contrasts with the red. I am not talking about exact colour matching but rather the contrast.
TW
|
|
 |
dthead
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 15, 2003 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009 Location: Melbourne, Australia
contact
|
post
|
|
| dthead |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:19 pm
|
| Post edited by RP staff |
Guys, with colour - it is a minefield as to what is "right" "wrong" or "near enough". We all have our perception, and as we seem to see different societies have official differences as well.
It is a HOT TOPIC, and let's stop the personal references that one is right the other is..... as see in the first three posts of this thread and back in the originating thread.
Talk colours or not at all guys.....
And remember saying you have proof is different from proving you have proof..... we want to know facts if that is the case - something that in certain circumstances would breech your organidsations rules (at the exteme end).\ - iE think carefully before posting guys.
- Railpage Australia™ |
|
|
 |
fast01
BUTTSCRATCHER!
Joined: Sep 01, 2004 Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009 Location: Reloading
contact
|
post
|
|
| fast01 |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:28 pm
|
| t_woodroffe wrote: | | Quote: |
as we all know how historically accurate the paint on SRV's stock is, take a look at S313, R711, the BRS's in Red/Yellow/, L1162
|
Irrelevant. I stated T 356 none of the above. | Yes, but saying that one loco has the correct shade when others in the stable clearly don't is like like saying my smeg don't stink because I wear deodorant.| t_woodroffe wrote: | | Quote: |
There are many that can provide it.
|
Front and centre. How did SRHC establish the (alledged) veracity of their gold? Taking samples off C 501? Pity Clyde Engineering got the polyurethane shade of gold on the C Class wrong ..... | Did I say that I was one of those people? I know that a heck of a lot of research was put it to get it.
| t_woodroffe wrote: | | I have ex Newport paint shop swatches from enamel matching VR specification. | Thats nice, may I suggest using them as a guide the next time a SRV loco needs a paint?
|
|
 |
rjcas
SprogMasterZer0
Joined: Dec 16, 2004 Last Visited: Dec 29, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
| rjcas |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:38 pm
|
[quote="t_woodroffe"]| Quote: | As an aside take a look at a slide/print of an F Class 0-6-0 circa 1960 and see how the gold contrasts with the red. I am not talking about exact colour matching but rather the contrast.
TW |
That is probably the most inaccurate way of telling how correct the colours were. Slide photography, as great as it is, does mess around with the colours and contrasts a bit.
Covering my smeg here, and I do not speak on behalf of the SRHC, but honestly mate, get off your high horse. I have the personal belief that yeah, the SRHC Yellow is a bit off but not that far off. At the risk of repeating myself, the shades varied from depot to depot, the paint wore over time which in turn changed the overall shade of the colours, take a look at pictures of weathered locos and brand spanking new locos... There are many factors you are not taking into account in your argument.
I know for a fact that the SRHC use two pack paints, so weathering that paint is a difficult chore, the colours don't fade as easily and overall, the paint is a lot easier to clean. Not too sure what they use down there at Newport and perhaps you can confirm this for me TW, but it isn't two pack paint to my knowledge (I know most of the steam locos use two pack).
Gone to the Pub... I'll be home tomorrow night....

|
|
 |
michaelgreenhill
Patron Saint of Alcohol

Joined: Jan 17, 1985 Last Visited: Jan 5, 2009 Location: Lost Somewhere In Time
contact
|
post
|
|
| michaelgreenhill |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:56 pm
|
The way I see it, you have two options:- Donate your oh-so-accurate swatches to your favourite preservation group - or better still, all of them - and then you can rest assured that the next loco painted will be in Terry's authentic VR colours
- Shut up and get over it. It's off by an order of magnitude of bugger all. If you get this antsy about colours, how are you not exploding with sheer anger at the completely inaccurate paint jobs used by 707 Ops, SRV, Puffing Billy, etc...
|
|
 |
Supt. of Printing
Deputy Commissioner
Joined: Feb 08, 2004 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009 Location: Gembrook Line
contact
|
post
|
|
| Supt. of Printing |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:35 pm
|
| michaelgreenhill wrote: | | . . . completely inaccurate paint jobs used by . . . Puffing Billy, etc... |
What's inaccurate with Puffing Billy's colours (I'm not suggesting there aren't inaccuracies)? And can someone provide more accurate ones?
|
|
 |
Deep Throat
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Mar 21, 2004 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009 Location: Hanging out with Donald Snerd
contact
|
post
|
|
| Deep Throat |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:45 pm
|
Said it before and I'll back michaelgreenhill.
t_woodroffe, send a blank cheque, and said paint swatches to:
Seymour Railway Heritage Centre
PO Box 515
Seymour Vic 3660
and
Steamrail Victoria
PO Box 125
Newport Vic 3015
When cheques for repainting are cashed (I hope you've got deep pockets) and locos are repainted - if there are then any faults, then saddle that high horse.
This is endemic of a now thankfully disappearing attitude amongst some people formerly responsible for archival collections. Rather than using the resources donated to them or pbtained for the betterment of rail preservation, they hung onto it, making sure that it was used for 'genuine research' which was determined on very narrow lines.
At least now, while still recognising the need for proper conservation techniques and ensuring the security of the items, that they will be used to prevent such arguments.
Anonymous - and proud of it.
|
|
 |
VBAndy
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Apr 30, 2004 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
| VBAndy |
|
 |
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:39 pm
|
TW, your picking a fight ya can't win.
Shades and fonts varied over the years, goes without saying...thousands of collections of photos can prove it. To date, the closest matches I've seen are SRHC's B74, S303 & T378. YVTR's T341 & Walker now joins the ranks. This goes not only for correct shades of the colours, but also for lettering, space between lines etc.
I don't knock the work Steamrail does, I mightent agree with some of their approaches but they still do good work. But for you to say T356's blue and gold is dead on is sheer stupidity. T356 is the least accurate attempt to date. If ya need proof of that, search around for a picture of T356 when it was brand spankers, then in service. Then compare those to a current day shot. You can do the same with the L.
If we really want to be technical, the most accurate locos in VR livery are those that still retain the livery it wore in service.
Ultimatley this comes down to "Whose the biggest Rivet Nazi" but c'mon mate, you can't tell me your that biased.
|
|
 |
TheRev
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Jan 30, 2004 Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009 Location: On the phone.
contact
|
post
|
|
| TheRev |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:52 am
|
I reckon everybody needs to calm down a little.
| t_woodroffe wrote: |
Front and centre. How did SRHC establish the (alledged) veracity of their gold? Taking samples off C 501? Pity Clyde Engineering got the polyurethane shade of gold on the C Class wrong ..... | Possibly, but I know that yellow samples were taken from both T320 and B74 when they were first restored. Whether or not these are still on file is unknown. In regards to C501's paint, it did recieve a CCO and repaint before V/LINE came into affect. If your claims are true about VR spec; what's to say the paint from it's first CCO repaint weren't used, which should be - as you claim, VR spec. This would make your claim about Clyde getting the paint shade wrong irrelevent.
| t_woodroffe wrote: | | I have ex Newport paint shop swatches from enamel matching VR specification. | Yes, I know you do. And in your defence, I also know that you have offered copies to preservation groups, which I think should be applauded.
However, no matter how well dry paint is looked after, the pigment still deteriorates and fades. I also know that the paint samples you hold are from around the 1970's or early 1980's. The era of significance, as far as I am aware with the SRHC, is the mid to late 1950's. Paint recipes change over time, and the colour shades change with it. So while the samples you hold may be correct for 1970's era VR livery, they may be a noticably different shade of blue and yellow compared to 1950's era VR paint.
| t_woodroffe wrote: | As an aside take a look at a slide/print of an F Class 0-6-0 circa 1960 and see how the gold contrasts with the red. I am not talking about exact colour matching but rather the contrast.
TW | I agree there, but having said that, things can and do look different in 'real life' as opposed to seeing them on film or slides - especially if the slide is faded. What contrasts well in a photo, may not looking at it for real. Also, we're moving from anolog into digital at a rapid rate. Digital doesn't suffer the fading and dis-colouration that it's anolog predecessor does.
T356's livery when first restored, was correct for late era VR; but now it is not even close to either eras.
A bus is a glorified toaster on wheels.
|
|
 |
VRfan
Moderator

Joined: Jan 13, 2003 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009 Location: In front of my computer :-p
contact
|
post
|
|
| VRfan |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:04 pm
|
| VBAndy wrote: | | But for you to say T356's blue and gold is dead on is sheer stupidity. T356 is the least accurate attempt to date. |
IMHO the paint Steamrail used when T356 and T364 were first restored looked closer to VR colours than the latest repaint of T356:
As for SRHC, IMHO the yellow looks a bit too deep. However I'm probably used to faded Kodachrome slides. After all, it's been almost 30 years since a loco was painted into VR colours by the railways. I've never personally seen a new paint job other than ones by preservation groups.
|
|
 |
VBAndy
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Apr 30, 2004 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
contact
|
post
|
|
| VBAndy |
|
 |
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:17 pm
|
Nice photo VRfan, I agree with you about the T's. They look great in the picture, and they looked great weathered. A fair crack at an accurate livery. Only thing I can nit pick about with that paticular shot is those damned ditch lights
Seeing that photo reminds me of the good ol' days. No logos plastered all over the cars and locos, no full length handrails. Good era of preservation
Real shame now days though. Take a similar photo, 40 different SRV logos on the one train, thomas the tank blue diesels...what the hell went wrong?
|
|
 |
639
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Sep 22, 2005 Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009 Location: Daylesford
contact
|
post
|
|
| 639 |
|
 |
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 12:59 pm
|
|
We will just have to wait and see what colours T364 appears in after its overhaul. Personally I think SRHC have done a great job with the colours the blue looks spot on the yellow is very close.
|
|
 |
perks
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Apr 05, 2004 Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009 Location: Sunny Vic
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 6:59 pm
|
I find it interesting that people can say this colour is right, or wrong, whatever. Most of the references as to whats right or wrong can be false on their own. A loco the second it went out the door had some amount of dirt on it. Ageing can occur very quickly in some paints and of course light levels do affect any picture, regardless of the type of film, age, etc. It seems that most references to whats right or wrong are peoples impressions, and we know how memories are.
It was mentioned that most depots had variations in their colours, and this is evident when you work on these locos.
22RM had one panel that was sanded fairly hard. I had one spot with 7 different layers of yellow paint and guess what. They were all different. Paint itself has changed dramatically in the time since the first B got painted. Early yellow paints had almost a chalky composition to it and were poor at reflecting light, giving them a lighter appearance. Later ones have higher levels of gloss even after a few years sun light. Paints also change with age, even if stored in a dark environment.
I ask you this. Get the colour numbers for a paint. Then get it mixed in Acrylic, Enamel, Spray Auto Enamel and 2 Pac and paint a comparison. They will be different. Close, but different. We did this with Wagon red when painting the ZLP and QN wagons at YVTR.
So simply, this is a question that cannot be answered. Their is a bit of a range of colours that could be argued as being correct. As for most striking, well, gloss blue and gloss yellow does it pretty well.
|
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
|
You cannot post new threads in this forum You cannot reply to threads in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group
Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
|
|