Railpage Australia™
Diamond Valley Railway  
No Clean Feed - Stop Internet Censorship in Australia
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!Mobile Edition
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/1
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

"Late Bird" train travel - free after 8pm

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Melbourne suburban
Page 2 of 3   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Author Message
Speed Chief Commissioner   Joined: Mar 19, 2007
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009


contact

post
Speed   
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 6:07 pm
My belief was that the Early Bird scheme was still confined to a trial on the Frankston and Sydenham lines. I believe that it has increased patronage before the morning peak but has been less than successful in that it has not brought about a reduction in morning peak usage.

Were a Night Owl (sounds better than Late Bird) scheme to have the same effect, the new patronage would consist of many "revellers" as opposed to workers. It could also include people who are willing to collect a free ticket but are seeking to loiter on the train rather than to travel between work or pleasure and home.

Promoting travel on the shoulder-peaks would still help to redistribute load on the system but discounting travel on shoulder-peak periods would serve better to allay concerns about undesirables travelling on free tickets.
 
s
drwaddles In need of a breath mint   Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Last Visited: Dec 11, 2008
Location: Lifting the A-League trophy!


contact

post
drwaddles   
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:50 pm
If one catches a bus from the station on their trip home, there is no saving. Not to mention there's probably no buses to catch either.

If one decides to come into work late and go home late via park and ride - will they be able to find a parking spot at 9am or 10am? Perhaps if hell freezes over.

Brumby, you are a dead-set goose.



People who talk out their asre usually have bad breath.
 
s
ParkesHub Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jul 29, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
ParkesHub   
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:06 pm
The whole idea is a lot of BS designed to suggest that the idiot Brumby is doing "something" whereas he's doing nothing. Nice try at the 'spin', idiot!

Dare I say...we should give Ted Bailleau a go...
 
s
alstom_888m Chief Commissioner   Joined: Aug 26, 2007
Last Visited: Dec 23, 2008
Location: Craigieburn Suburban Railway Line, Melbourne


contact

post
alstom_888m   
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 8:23 pm
The libs are a risk, they'll either fix the damn thing or screw it over even more (if that is possible?). I don't even remember what Kennent did wrong with the network, I'd be interested to see The Met's punctuality statistics actually.

Labor will, on the other hand, sit on their little seats, twiddling their thumbs going "do-do-do-do", waiting for some divine life-form to suddenly lay more tracks and give us new sparks from the heavens...

And yes, that is a serious comment. But enough yapping, the best solution would be to ensure Brumby and Kosky don't get another term.



Reliable, Economical, Safe, By Rail.

Away for Summer. Won't be on RP.
 
s
574M White Guru   Joined: Mar 15, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009
Location: Puttaparthi, India


contact

post
574M   
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:06 pm
Gauntlet wrote:
This reminds me of that summer when they had free public transport on Sundays. I guess it was 1981/82 because they had the first three-zone system and were giving away the outdated tickets. I think it was quite successful, but I was a bit too young to remember much about it.


Oh, I remember it. It gave a whole new meaning to crush load ... and it was run using the regular services, no extras. The first run in on each line were totally, you know, squasho Exclamation
 
s
574M White Guru   Joined: Mar 15, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009
Location: Puttaparthi, India


contact

post
574M   
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:29 pm
I don't think this idea is all spin. Its probably going to be the reverse of the early morning scheme for late workers. Face it, when I was working in St Kilda Road, most peak services had departed before 6PM and services reverted to 20 minute, 30 minute frequencies. Many train-sets docked out of Jolimont, ran to their destination, and either shunted or came back to the City empty cars.

Not so now, I can recall my shock getting on an express to Box Hill around 7PM at night at Flagstaff, some years ago. Uheard of way back, 30 years ago. Sometime in the 80's, Flextime arrived and everything changed. So I will hazard a bet that this late-ticket scheme will be a goer for passengers with periodical tickets.


MelbourneCity wrote:
Frankston needs a 3rd track.


Yes.

Somebody in the WWW wrote:

The only possible justification for a third track on the entire length of that corridor would be for freight trains accessing the upgraded Port of Hastings, which would be better served via the new line from Dandenong anyway.


I accept you have this opinion, but I don't agree with it.

Have you been at Franga in the evening peak and watched the services arrive one after the other? I'd say that the day is coming when three tracks all the way to Frankston will happen, and that, to service commuters on the Peninsula. An awful lot of people live down there and drive cars. And they ain't gonna be in their cars driving all the way to the city from Rosebud, Red Hill or Hastings for too much longer given the way the price of oil is going.

my 2¢
 
s
mjja Sir Nigel Gresley   Joined: Jan 13, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 6, 2009
Location: Mount Waverley, Melbourne


contact

post
mjja   
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:54 pm
There is plenty of justification for early bird and late bird/night owl (thanks Speed, sounds much better) tickets to apply to buses and trams as well as trains. Grab a bus just about anywhere in the suburbs in peak time - it will be standing room only. But my daily commute on the 6:36am on Route 733 is considered well loaded if it has 20 people on board. The problem isn't as critical as it is with trains - but we need to emphasise and enhance the connectivity of the system rather than creating barriers.



Happy Gunzelling and remember, "Go by rail!"

Michael Angelico
President, Smart Passengers Inc
(My opinions are my own unless specifically stated.)
 
s
Scottie_theNerd Train Controller   Joined: May 24, 2005
Last Visited: Nov 20, 2008


contact

post
Scottie_theNerd   
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:03 am
In my opinion, free late travel sounds more appealing than early travel. It seems easier to "stay behind" for a later train than it is to get to where you want to be 1-2 hours earlier.



6-car trains have a total of 18 doors. Don't feel obligated to use just one.
 
s
Limited_Express Station Master   Joined: Feb 02, 2005
Last Visited: Oct 7, 2008
Location: Arrival, not taking passengers


contact

post
Limited_Express   
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:00 am
The government should have better spent the money to run a few more trains into the night, such as minimum 20-minute frequency (similar to arrangements during Saturday day-time) on all lines until 10pm, intermixing with down expresses on busier lines like Belgrave/Lilydale, Werribee/Willamstown and Pakenham/Cranbourne. Belgrave/Lilydale already operates something similar until 8:30pm-ish IIRC. There should be not much stress on rollingstock or network bottlenecks, just a few more drivers would fix the job.

I could only imagine places such as Ringwood, Lilydale, Noble Park etc would be like if free travel is allowed at night. Unless accompanied by staff presence at all trains during the night, some quiet train travels at such time of the day could simply become history.
 
s
ZH836301 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Apr 26, 2006
Last Visited: Dec 30, 2008
Location: BleakCity


contact

post
ZH836301   
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:57 pm
574M wrote:
I don't think this idea is all spin. Its probably going to be the reverse of the early morning scheme for late workers. Face it, when I was working in St Kilda Road, most peak services had departed before 6PM and services reverted to 20 minute, 30 minute frequencies. Many train-sets docked out of Jolimont, ran to their destination, and either shunted or came back to the City empty cars.

Departures from Melbourne Central to Sydenham post-5pm:

1705, 1717, 1726, 1736, 1755, 1806, 1818 (terms. St Albans), 1838, 1857, 1918, 1927, 1957

574M wrote:
Have you been at Franga in the evening peak and watched the services arrive one after the other? I'd say that the day is coming when three tracks all the way to Frankston will happen, and that, to service commuters on the Peninsula. An awful lot of people live down there and drive cars. And they ain't gonna be in their cars driving all the way to the city from Rosebud, Red Hill or Hastings for too much longer given the way the price of oil is going.

Don't talk rubbish.

The amount of people driving from the Peninsula to the CBD is very small, probably near non-existant for Hastings, even smaller than the number taking the train.

The Frankston line needs four tracks to Mentone - that's it.

Nobody's going to build a third track to Frankston for one train per day.
 
s
Knowitall Banned   Joined: Mar 25, 2007
Last Visited: Nov 14, 2008
Location: Banned


contact

post
Knowitall   
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:03 am
[quote="ZH836301"]
The Frankston line needs four tracks to Mentone - that's it. [quote]

Mordiallic would be better suited than mentone but I do agree all the way to Frankston is overkill



Banned
 
s
Natronomonas Train Controller   Joined: Jan 14, 2008
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
Natronomonas   
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:14 am
A few letters in The Age today about how "well" early bird tickets are functioning...

http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/letters/missing-freebies-in-the-west--20080908-4c7e.html
 
s
mjja Sir Nigel Gresley   Joined: Jan 13, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 6, 2009
Location: Mount Waverley, Melbourne


contact

post
mjja   
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:34 am
Frankston is the busiest station outside the CBD. On top of which, the entire peninsula is getting populated so it's going to get busier.

Nobody is going to take the train while it's an hour journey from Frankston to the city. There's a perfectly good freeway you see...

Frankston deserves four tracks and all-day expresses second only to Pakenham.



Happy Gunzelling and remember, "Go by rail!"

Michael Angelico
President, Smart Passengers Inc
(My opinions are my own unless specifically stated.)
 
s
melbtrip Chief Commissioner   Joined: Mar 02, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 21, 2008


contact

post
melbtrip   
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:20 pm
What the Frankston railway line need is the following:
• A two tier train service
.........o Express services Flinders Street stopping all stations to South Yarra and then express to Caulfield and then express to Southlands (new station) and stops all stations to Frankston
........o Stopping all stations from Flinders Street to Southlands (new station)
• Some Direct services from Flinders Street( not travelling via city loop)



 
s
route14 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Dec 28, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009


contact

post
route14   
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:38 pm
It's Southland actually, don't get it mixed up with Sutherlands.



A true friend will see you through when others see that you are through.
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Melbourne suburban
Page 2 of 3  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You cannot post new threads in this forum
You cannot reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©


[ switch to normal layout ]

Comments are property of their posters
© 2003-2009 Interactive Omnimedia

Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2009 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.417 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.52%