Railpage Australia™
  
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/12
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

SteamRanger Heritage Railway

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> South Australia
Page 16 of 17   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 15, 16, 17  Next

Author Message
David Peters Minister for Railways   Joined: Nov 29, 2005
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008
Location: In a black Trans Am!


contact

post
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:20 pm
Parts for 900's are not that hard to get, you can get complete motors for power generation etc from Blackstone, which was a part of the company, I think Paxman own them now, the original EE parts may not be available but those Blackstone or whatever it is offered as now certainly is.

The only reason AN scrapped them was because of the MU incompatibility, the locos were not that powerful by current standards at the time and the fact that the main wiring was shot, too expensive to repair, for too little work! They were like a car, it gets to a point where you have to make a decision to either repair the existing car or get a new one to replace it.



National Railway Museum member.
The opinions expressed by my me in these posts is not the opinion of the N.R.M. and should not be construed as such.
Ferroequinologist and Microferroequinologist.
Photosite http://davidpeters950.fotopic.net
 
s
Pressman Chief Commissioner   Joined: May 23, 2006
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: anywhere between Glenbawn and Pemberton


contact

post
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:10 pm
Forgive my lack of knowledge on Locomotive electrics, but can someone let me know what the major reason for the MU incompatibility was.
I have heard that other locos where at one time incompatible, but were modified to make them compatable.
Obviously there must be a standard circuitry used these days.



Cheers,
Tony
On the road again, it's my yearly "paid holiday" time again! Very Happy
http://tony33.fotopic.net
 
s
409 Minister for Railways   Joined: Jul 25, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: "Well, we sorta hit a little snag when the universe sorta collapsed on itself."


contact

post
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:49 pm
The main reason why EEs aren't compatible with other American locos is that the various American makes operate to an MU voltage of 72 volts and the standard 21 pin plug where as EE MU equipment operates to a voltage of 110 volts as well as a different MU jumper plug. What doesn't exactly help is the 900 class notch system with 10 notches rather then 8.

EE locos have been able to run with American make locomotives but after a lot of part substitution of components. Maybe one of our Tasmanian collegues can help out in what was actually done since their one off ZR and ZP classes have been made American loco MU compatible.



2008 BOGIE AWARD WINNER - Best Contribution to Model Railways

LINK TO YOUTUBE PROFILE

"I'd use an 830 for my respirator!"
 
s
Pressman Chief Commissioner   Joined: May 23, 2006
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: anywhere between Glenbawn and Pemberton


contact

post
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:53 pm
409 wrote:
The main reason why EEs aren't compatible with other American locos is that the various American makes operate to an MU voltage of 72 volts and the standard 21 pin plug where as EE MU equipment operates to a voltage of 110 volts as well as a different MU jumper plug. What doesn't exactly help is the 900 class notch system with 10 notches rather then 8.

EE locos have been able to run with American make locomotives but after a lot of part substitution of components. Maybe one of our Tasmanian collegues can help out in what was actually done since their one off ZR and ZP classes have been made American loco MU compatible.


Thanks Will, I know the different voltages and pin configuration differences could be overcome, but 10 v 8 notch controls is a different kettle of fish



Cheers,
Tony
On the road again, it's my yearly "paid holiday" time again! Very Happy
http://tony33.fotopic.net
 
s
Z1NorthernProgress2110 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Nov 30, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: Burnie, Tasmania


contact

post
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 8:46 am
409 wrote:
Maybe one of our Tasmanian collegues can help out in what was actually done since their one off ZR and ZP classes have been made American loco MU compatible.


Don't forget the MKAs as well. AFAIK, only thing that was done to them was rewired to the American standard. Also, all have desktop control, only ZR2101 is different with its brakes, still has its Westinghouse 26L brakes.



Cheers Damien Smith
http://z1-2110gallery.fotopic.net
Updated 28th September, includes various Y2151 shunting and Upper Burnie lookout pics
 
s
simont141 Chief Commissioner   Joined: May 12, 2003
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: Adelaide


contact

post
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:17 pm
So I hear that 621's long awaited return to service has been somewhat curtailed...  
s
xr554 Assistant Commissioner   Joined: Apr 25, 2005
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: Ashton S.A.


contact

post
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:40 pm
simont141 wrote:
So I hear that 621's long awaited return to service has been somewhat curtailed...

Yep, I've heard that there are 2 crown stays broken. One on top of the boiler and one on the side of the boiler.



Andrew McGregor
Some of my pictures can be found at http://andrew777.fotopic.net/ updated 29/11/08.
 
s
2001 The Snow Lord The Snow Lord
  Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: The road jump at Charlotte Pass. Paxman Valenta on two planks.


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:16 am
Damn .... smoke deflectors still missing.



2001

Member Falls Creek 2018 Olympics Committee.
 
s
TheRev Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 30, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: On the phone.


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:24 pm
xr554 wrote:
simont141 wrote:
So I hear that 621's long awaited return to service has been somewhat curtailed...

Yep, I've heard that there are 2 crown stays broken. One on top of the boiler and one on the side of the boiler.
Why would only two broken stays stop the loco from entering service?



A bus is a glorified toaster on wheels.
 
s
simont141 Chief Commissioner   Joined: May 12, 2003
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: Adelaide


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:36 pm
TheRev wrote:
xr554 wrote:
simont141 wrote:
So I hear that 621's long awaited return to service has been somewhat curtailed...

Yep, I've heard that there are 2 crown stays broken. One on top of the boiler and one on the side of the boiler.
Why would only two broken stays stop the loco from entering service?


The head of one of the stays was also weeping.  
s
David Peters Minister for Railways   Joined: Nov 29, 2005
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008
Location: In a black Trans Am!


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:17 pm
After watching a video on another site we are lucky it did not clean up another car, these morons stopped at the crossing, then as the train was approaching drove across in front of it. More guts than brains if you ask me! Cool



National Railway Museum member.
The opinions expressed by my me in these posts is not the opinion of the N.R.M. and should not be construed as such.
Ferroequinologist and Microferroequinologist.
Photosite http://davidpeters950.fotopic.net
 
s
Aaron Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: University of Adelaide SA


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:50 pm
2001 wrote:
Damn .... smoke deflectors still missing.


I hear you brother!



Aaron
Chief trouble shooter and resident myth buster NMRI Inc.

My NEW gallery! Finally online again

No trams, more dams!
TA, in charge of less now than before...
 
s
xr554 Assistant Commissioner   Joined: Apr 25, 2005
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: Ashton S.A.


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:17 pm
TheRev wrote:
xr554 wrote:
simont141 wrote:
So I hear that 621's long awaited return to service has been somewhat curtailed...

Yep, I've heard that there are 2 crown stays broken. One on top of the boiler and one on the side of the boiler.
Why would only two broken stays stop the loco from entering service?
Because the 2 stays are pissing out water, not just a small trickle like most people think they are.



Andrew McGregor
Some of my pictures can be found at http://andrew777.fotopic.net/ updated 29/11/08.
 
s
TheRev Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 30, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: On the phone.


contact

post
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 2:08 pm
xr554 wrote:
TheRev wrote:
xr554 wrote:
simont141 wrote:
So I hear that 621's long awaited return to service has been somewhat curtailed...

Yep, I've heard that there are 2 crown stays broken. One on top of the boiler and one on the side of the boiler.
Why would only two broken stays stop the loco from entering service?
Because the 2 stays are pissing out water, not just a small trickle like most people think they are.
Interesting. Time for some new stays then - or/and an inspection of thickness of the boiler platework in that area.



A bus is a glorified toaster on wheels.
 
s
trainweld Junior Train Controller   Joined: Oct 01, 2006
Last Visited: Nov 12, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:37 pm
TheRev wrote:
xr554 wrote:
TheRev wrote:
xr554 wrote:
simont141 wrote:
So I hear that 621's long awaited return to service has been somewhat curtailed...

Yep, I've heard that there are 2 crown stays broken. One on top of the boiler and one on the side of the boiler.
Why would only two broken stays stop the loco from entering service?
Because the 2 stays are pissing out water, not just a small trickle like most people think they are.
Interesting. Time for some new stays then - or/and an inspection of thickness of the boiler platework in that area.


an inspection means an ultrasound to check the quality of the plates of the boiler not too much work just time consuming and costly replacing the stays could be a big job however i beleive that the SHR enthusiast page says nothing about this problem though Confused however regulator issues were fixed Smile
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> South Australia
Page 16 of 17  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 15, 16, 17  Next

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You cannot post new threads in this forum
You cannot reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©



Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2008 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.084 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.39%