Railpage Australia™
  
No Clean Feed - Stop Internet Censorship in Australia
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!Mobile Edition
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/1
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

Portland - V/Line Rules Out Passenger Service.

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Victoria
Page 1 of 1   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ]

Author Message
Y115 Locomotive Fireman   Joined: Sep 18, 2008
Last Visited: Jan 6, 2009
Location: Portland


contact

post
Y115   
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:05 am
From today's Portland Observer:

"V/Line rules out passenger service.

V/Line has ruled out a supplementary passenger
rail service from Portland to Melbourne via Ararat.

The proposed service was discussed briefly at
a meeting last week in Melbourne between V/Line
management and Glenelg Shire mayor Geoff White.

It has also ruled out in the immediate future
increasing the number of services operating on the
Portland to Melbourne via Warrnambool route.

Cr White said V/Line had indicated rail carriages
on the Warrnambool line would be improved as
V/Locity trains were rolled out throughout the state."


Perhaps this will stop the endless waffling on about passenger trains to Portland. Very Happy
 
s
Flatop Chief Train Controller   Joined: Jan 07, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009
Location: Some where in a Cab


contact

post
Flatop   
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:39 am
V/Line cannot run what they have now let alone running more services.They should be looking at there on time departures and arrivals.They are smeg when it comes to customer service.
 
s
Wilfy2007 Assistant Commissioner   Joined: Mar 19, 2007
Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009
Location: N.S.W.


contact

post
Wilfy2007   
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:08 am
Y115 wrote:
From today's Portland Observer:

"V/Line rules out passenger service.

V/Line has ruled out a supplementary passenger
rail service from Portland to Melbourne via Ararat.

The proposed service was discussed briefly at
a meeting last week in Melbourne between V/Line
management and Glenelg Shire mayor Geoff White.

It has also ruled out in the immediate future
increasing the number of services operating on the
Portland to Melbourne via Warrnambool route.

Cr White said V/Line had indicated rail carriages
on the Warrnambool line would be improved as
V/Locity trains were rolled out throughout the state."


Perhaps this will stop the endless waffling on about passenger trains to Portland. Very Happy

Y115,

To you it may seem like endless waffling.

The above quote says no increase in services in the immediate future.

What about in 2 to 5 years when demand is greater.

Will it be Ok then to forecast that maybe in 2013 a service to Portland via Ararat will be needed because of increased demand, petrol prices and less cars due to the global recession which has now hit all over the world.

To predict what will happen in the future is very difficult.

With patronage increasing 60% in the past 2 years do you dare predict a 120% increase in 4 years being the past 2 years and the future 2 years, may not happen but it is a distinct possibility.

Interesting times ahead for all Railway Operators I am sure.

Regards,



Wilfy 2007

www.freewebs.com/neriau/index.htm
www.freewebs.com/saroeight/
"An Advocate for the return of Railcar Passenger services in Outer Suburban and Rural Australia"
 
s
Y115 Locomotive Fireman   Joined: Sep 18, 2008
Last Visited: Jan 6, 2009
Location: Portland


contact

post
Y115   
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:40 am
If people can't afford to drive in the next few years then I expect there will be extra services on the existing road/rail from Portland to Melbourne but highly unlikely to be from Portland via Ararat to Melbourne. Most of us who live here are quite happy with things the way they are now, while a few of us railfans would like to see more trains, common sense tells us that it's not going to happen.
 
s
ZH836301 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Apr 26, 2006
Last Visited: Dec 30, 2008
Location: BleakCity


contact

post
ZH836301   
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:52 pm
Wilfy wrote:
With patronage increasing 60% in the past 2 years do you dare predict a 120% increase in 4 years being the past 2 years and the future 2 years, may not happen but it is a distinct possibility.

Come on Wilfy, there aren't that many pensioners.

Quote:
Cr White said V/Line had indicated rail carriages on the Warrnambool line would be improved as V/Locity trains were rolled out throughout the state."

This is interesting however - seems to hint at Vlocitys to Warrnambool (as there isn't really much better loco hauled rolling stock than what's already being run).
 
s
alstom_888m Chief Commissioner   Joined: Aug 26, 2007
Last Visited: Dec 23, 2008
Location: Craigieburn Suburban Railway Line, Melbourne


contact

post
alstom_888m   
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:57 pm
It hints intercity VLocities elsewhere too...

Maybe the sets that don't have a 3rd car will get a First class with buffet car instead.



Reliable, Economical, Safe, By Rail.

Away for Summer. Won't be on RP.
 
s
574M White Guru   Joined: Mar 15, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009
Location: Puttaparthi, India


contact

post
574M   
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:48 pm
Y115 wrote:
If people can't afford to drive in the next few years then I expect there will be extra services on the existing road/rail from Portland to Melbourne but highly unlikely to be from Portland via Ararat to Melbourne. Most of us who live here are quite happy with things the way they are now, while a few of us railfans would like to see more trains, common sense tells us that it's not going to happen.


That, Y115, is a priori negative cynicism
 
s
Somebody in the WWW Comeng Gunzel   Joined: Oct 08, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 31, 2008


contact

post
Somebody in the WWW   
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:49 pm
574M wrote:
That, Y115, is a priori negative cynicism, and not common sense at all.

You better tell us what is common sense then.



Transport Textbook: Public transport analysis & discussion.
 
s
574M White Guru   Joined: Mar 15, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009
Location: Puttaparthi, India


contact

post
574M   
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:54 pm
Congratulations on your four years at Railpage Australia™, SITWWW.

Now, what is common sense?

Not offending the canons of proprietary behaviour.

Y115 was being cynical and saying he could not forsee any passenger service. wilfy cited some very, very interesting figures with regard to increases in patronage. Who knows what the future holds; I quite agree with wilfy and alstrom. Anything is possible.
 
s
per1 Junior Train Controller   Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 6, 2009


contact

post
per1   
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:06 pm
And what is the reason?
 
s
NottaGunzel Banned   Joined: Jul 05, 2007
Last Visited: Nov 12, 2008
Location: Banned


contact

post
NottaGunzel   
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:41 pm
per1 wrote:
And what is the reason?


I could tell you per1 Twisted Evil

But it would be a waste of time because I doubt it would actually sink in Rolling Eyes

Razz Razz Razz
 
s
fabricator Deputy Commissioner   Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009
Location: Gawler


contact

post
fabricator   
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:32 am
Before we get too carried away with opening new passenger services using Vlocities, don't you think we should open Bombardier a new factory to produce more of said railcars ?

Right now its looking more and more like the one thing this country's passenger railways need is a dirty great factory to pump out Vlocities, what ever Adelaide get made, and replacements for the overland, Hitachis and Comengs.

I still wonder if increasingly longer Vlocities sets is such a smart idea, I mean one locomotive + 8 cars is easier to maintain than 8 railcars each with its own engine, generator, fuel tank etc etc.
 
s
wongm Minister for Railways   Joined: May 26, 2005
Last Visited: Jan 1, 2009
Location: Geelong, Victoria


contact

post
wongm   
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:17 pm
fabricator wrote:
I still wonder if increasingly longer Vlocities sets is such a smart idea, I mean one locomotive + 8 cars is easier to maintain than 8 railcars each with its own engine, generator, fuel tank etc etc.

However some of the 8 cars worth of Vlocities fail you have a good chance of still running some kind of service with them. You also have less spare parts needed to be kept around, I believe the VLs are pretty modular so they just swap bits out rather than fix in situ.



Marcus Wong

Railway Pics New URL, updated January 3rd
Youtube videos
Rail Geelong: History of Geelong's Railways. Victoria's real Main Line.
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Victoria
Page 1 of 1  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ]

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You cannot post new threads in this forum
You cannot reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©


[ switch to normal layout ]

Comments are property of their posters
© 2003-2009 Interactive Omnimedia

Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2009 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.037 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.32%