Railpage Australia™
  
No Clean Feed - Stop Internet Censorship in Australia
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!Mobile Edition
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/1
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

Fast rail, Sydney to Melbourne

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> New South Wales
Page 1 of 18   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18  Next

Author Message
jmw2508 Junior Train Controller   Joined: Jul 05, 2007
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
Location: Stanwell Park


contact

post
jmw2508   
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:51 pm
I am well aware of the numerous occasions on which this subject has been raised here, but in light of recent oil prices, global economic crisis, global warming, what is the chance of a Sydney to Melbourne fast train. Is all hope lost, or is the need stronger than ever? What technology would best be implemented on such a project?
 
s
Lazarus Locomotive Driver   Joined: Jan 03, 2007
Last Visited: Nov 21, 2008
Location: Missouri, USA


contact

post
Lazarus   
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:22 am
Uh, oil just dropped to under US$80 a barrel.
 
s
billybaxter Train Controller   Joined: Mar 01, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 9, 2009
Location: Bosnia Park, Fairfield


contact

post
billybaxter   
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:00 am
And at AUD 2 for EUR 1 buying anything from Alsthom or Siemens to run on the line is getting rather pricey.



Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society.
Mark Twain
 
s
jmw2508 Junior Train Controller   Joined: Jul 05, 2007
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
Location: Stanwell Park


contact

post
jmw2508   
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 6:51 am
Thats what I meant by oil prices, is all the fear gone now that prices are returning to normal.
 
s
cootanee Chief Train Controller   Joined: Apr 28, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
cootanee   
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:06 am
jmw2508 wrote:
Thats what I meant by oil prices, is all the fear gone now that prices are returning to normal.


Meltdown in world financial markets - no Babcock and Brown or Macquarie
 
s
simonl Deputy Commissioner   Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 3, 2009
Location: Brisbane


contact

post
simonl   
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:47 am
jmw2508 wrote:
I am well aware of the numerous occasions on which this subject has been raised here, but in light of recent oil prices, global economic crisis, global warming, what is the chance of a Sydney to Melbourne fast train. Is all hope lost, or is the need stronger than ever? What technology would best be implemented on such a project?

Hope is not lost completely, but it is very faint. Probably needs a minimum of 400km/h top speed. 320km/h wouldn't really do if you allow 30 minutes at each end of slow speed running to get through the cities.
 
s
jmw2508 Junior Train Controller   Joined: Jul 05, 2007
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
Location: Stanwell Park


contact

post
jmw2508   
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 6:00 pm
I think we should use tilt train technology, it seems appropriate for the terrain, it would also be compatible with QR's tilt train for future extensions. Is the QR tilt train Narrow gauge? I believe it is, how stupid of them, we very should get rid of state government.
 
s
trolleybusracer Deputy Commissioner   Joined: Dec 12, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
Location: St Albans Sydenham Watergardens Line


contact

post
trolleybusracer   
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:42 pm
Hey i would thank QR. They Proved that NG Isnt slow and Inefficent.
 
s
Hendo Train Controller   Joined: Jun 11, 2006
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009


contact

post
Hendo   
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:23 pm
Lazarus,

I appreciate you are in the states and look at it from USD perspective, but the price of oil is relative when our dollar was recently at 98c and a barrel was USD 135 the AUD cost was $137.75, today with our dollar at 65c and a barrel of oil at USD 77.70 the Australian cost is AUD $120, so a little cheaper but not much.

Therefore revitalising the Sydney, Canberra, Melbourne rail link for faster trains is sensible and viable even if they got a thrid track in most part for a British speed (170 kmh's) standard passenger service. As for a VFT prposal, you need to get people back to rail first with incremental improvements and prove the benefit.

cheers,
Hendo
 
s
mjja Sir Nigel Gresley   Joined: Jan 13, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009
Location: Mount Waverley, Melbourne


contact

post
mjja   
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:18 pm
It's no good basing the viability of infrastructure projects on anything as fickle as exchange rates, interest rates, the price of oil or the state of the world economy. By the time it gets anywhere near being opened to the public those things will have changed dramatically.

The real questions are, will people use it? Will it remove the need for a second Sydney airport? Will it reduce our dependence on imported oil? Will it have significant overall environmental benefits?

Since the answers to all those questions are "Yes, probably" the project is a serious candidate for Building Australia Fund money. But on the other hand, it's not urgent, only important - and there are plenty of highly urgent projects that need to be done.



Happy Gunzelling and remember, "Go by rail!"

Michael Angelico
President, Smart Passengers Inc
(My opinions are my own unless specifically stated.)
 
s
thadocta Chief Train Controller   Joined: Apr 18, 2004
Last Visited: Jan 1, 2009
Location: Katoomba


contact

post
thadocta   
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:46 am
jmw2508 wrote:
I think we should use tilt train technology, it seems appropriate for the terrain, it would also be compatible with QR's tilt train for future extensions. Is the QR tilt train Narrow gauge? I believe it is, how stupid of them, we very should get rid of state government.


Thank smeg the school holidays are nearly over (at least in NSW!)

Dave
 
s
bruce Chief Commissioner   Joined: Nov 29, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 5, 2009
Location: Newcastle


contact

post
bruce   
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:35 am
jmw2508 wrote:
Thats what I meant by oil prices, is all the fear gone now that prices are returning to normal.


If a global financial meltdown making a global recession a near certainty is required to get crude oil prices to $80/barrel, that would suggest that $80/barrel is not necessarily "normal".

Of course, I can remember when $50/barrel was considered by some an implausible story told to scare people.



-- Go Broadmeadow Magic --
 
s
bruce Chief Commissioner   Joined: Nov 29, 2003
Last Visited: Jan 5, 2009
Location: Newcastle


contact

post
bruce   
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:46 am
jmw2508 wrote:
I think we should use tilt train technology, it seems appropriate for the terrain, it would also be compatible with QR's tilt train for future extensions. Is the QR tilt train Narrow gauge? I believe it is, how stupid of them, we very should get rid of state government.


With tilt train technology, is it a Sydney / Melbourne service focusing on selling Sydney / Melbourne trips, or a Sydney / Melbourne route focusing on serving Goulburn, Wagga Wagga and Albury?

Or maybe, from the suggestion that getting rid of state government would fix all of Australia's infrastructure problems, the question should be whether you've been served Toohey's or VB, and how many.



-- Go Broadmeadow Magic --
 
s
jmw2508 Junior Train Controller   Joined: Jul 05, 2007
Last Visited: Jan 8, 2009
Location: Stanwell Park


contact

post
jmw2508   
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 2:47 pm
I had in mind, a Melbourne - Canberra - Sydney - Brisbane - Cains route. With of couse stops at major population centre's, eg Wollongong and Newcastle.
 
s
alltrainzfan Chief Commissioner   Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Last Visited: Jan 7, 2009
Location: At Many of Places Yet Nowhere


contact

post
alltrainzfan   
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:16 pm
The tilt train was trialed in 1995 by Countrylink, who used it for the Sydney to Canberra service. I think it made it to Canberra within 2.5 hours (check this figure please)? If really, that's a major improvement from the current Xplorer service which takes almost 4.5 hours and can be up to an hour late at times.

Fast rail is definitely viable, but should we use the current deviation, and use tilt trains, or build a completely new track to allow up to 360km/h running? That should definitely get rid of the need of a 2nd Sydney airport.

Thing is, if a new rail gets built for the East Coast corridor, other regional areas will be crying themselves left out. A tilt train which can go from 160km/h to 200km/h would be a nice option for Countrylink to replace all their trains with maybe?
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> New South Wales
Page 1 of 18  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18  Next

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You cannot post new threads in this forum
You cannot reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©


[ switch to normal layout ]

Comments are property of their posters
© 2003-2009 Interactive Omnimedia

Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2009 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.531 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.29%