Railpage Australia™
  
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/12
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

Epping to Chatswood starting date

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Sydney Suburban
Page 3 of 7   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Author Message
doridori Chief Commissioner   Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Last Visited: Nov 28, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:56 pm
HMC1989 wrote:
doridori wrote:
Are they planning to hold an open day for the public to walk through this, like has been done with multiple other new infrastructures ?


Maybe no public walks but I am on the list for the emergency evacuations to be held in Nov/Dec (Railcorp staff only).
Cheers

None of the emergency services are involved with that ?



May be young'n'dumb, yet unlike some, I've heart!
 
s
nadnerb_2000 Chief Commissioner   Joined: May 07, 2004
Last Visited: Nov 20, 2008
Location: between my hat and my shoe soles


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:21 pm
doridori wrote:
HMC1989 wrote:
doridori wrote:
Are they planning to hold an open day for the public to walk through this, like has been done with multiple other new infrastructures ?


Maybe no public walks but I am on the list for the emergency evacuations to be held in Nov/Dec (Railcorp staff only).
Cheers

None of the emergency services are involved with that ?


I don't believe so. Moreover, there are very few "operational" staff involved in this - its mainly office type staff as I understand it. They want people who don't have expert knowledge of rail operations (I can hear the punchlines coming), to simulate "average joe" passengers.

They probably will have the railcorp fire brigade in etc, but most of the scenarios will probably involve emergencies/evacuations where the fire brigade doesn't respond. After all, it's in tunnel - in real life people aren't just going to sit there and wait for the fire brigade to rescue them if there is a fire.
 
s
doridori Chief Commissioner   Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Last Visited: Nov 28, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:10 am
nadnerb_2000 wrote:
doridori wrote:
HMC1989 wrote:
doridori wrote:
Are they planning to hold an open day for the public to walk through this, like has been done with multiple other new infrastructures ?


Maybe no public walks but I am on the list for the emergency evacuations to be held in Nov/Dec (Railcorp staff only).
Cheers

None of the emergency services are involved with that ?


I don't believe so. Moreover, there are very few "operational" staff involved in this - its mainly office type staff as I understand it. They want people who don't have expert knowledge of rail operations (I can hear the punchlines coming), to simulate "average joe" passengers.

They probably will have the railcorp fire brigade in etc, but most of the scenarios will probably involve emergencies/evacuations where the fire brigade doesn't respond. After all, it's in tunnel - in real life people aren't just going to sit there and wait for the fire brigade to rescue them if there is a fire.


In real life, people are idiots, don't discount the stupidity of humans!
It is a pity that the emergency services aren't invited to this, as in real life, the response of the rail rescue crew is significantly slower than that of the fire and ambos and on par with the volunteer emergency crews...

To give more body to that statement, the rail rescue and recovery crews have to live within ~30 minutes of their base, then they have to get their gear and get to the location, and this comes directly from the horses mouth!



May be young'n'dumb, yet unlike some, I've heart!
 
s
thadocta Chief Train Controller   Joined: Apr 18, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:47 am
doridori wrote:
In real life, people are idiots, don't discount the stupidity of humans!


Probably entirely appropriate then that they are using managerial/office staff for the exercise!

Dave
 
s
doridori Chief Commissioner   Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Last Visited: Nov 28, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:53 am
[quote="thadocta"][quote="doridori"]In real life, people are idiots, don't discount the stupidity of humans![/quote]

Probably entirely appropriate then that they are using managerial/office staff for the exercise!

Dave[/quote]
I'll pay that call ;)
 
s
Bwana Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jul 21, 2003
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:24 am
nadnerb_2000 wrote:
They want people who don't have expert knowledge of rail operations (I can hear the punchlines coming), to simulate "average joe" passengers.

Wouldn't "average Joe" passengers have no option but to burn to death, given that they have no way of getting out of the train unless they can break through the windows (yeah, right!)?



I am SO moving to Victoria Street!!

Check out my pics at http://bwana.fotopic.net
 
s
HMC1989 Assistant Commissioner   Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008
Location: On the Short North


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:00 am
thadocta wrote:
doridori wrote:
In real life, people are idiots, don't discount the stupidity of humans!


Probably entirely appropriate then that they are using managerial/office staff for the exercise!

Dave


Geez I've just been promoted from the shop floor. Clap Do I get a pay rise? Laughing
Cheers



Go off or get off!

www.flickr.com/photos/12426964@N05/

Updated 9/11/08.
 
s
Blackadder Chief Commissioner   Joined: Aug 06, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: The only underground station where you need a umbrella


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:48 am
thadocta wrote:
doridori wrote:
In real life, people are idiots, don't discount the stupidity of humans!


Probably entirely appropriate then that they are using managerial/office staff for the exercise!

Dave


POTY Laughing



Here or there
 
s
sandown Deputy Commissioner   Joined: Jan 24, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008
Location: sydney


contact

post
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:12 pm
In addition to the new turn back adjacent to the Up Main at Epping servicing platforms 1 and 2 I noticed, whilst working thru Cheltenham last Friday, Platform 2 at Cheltenham is also now signalled for turnbacks. Much the same as a terminator at Eastwood on the Down Main.



Innuendo is not Italian for suppository
 
s
nadnerb_2000 Chief Commissioner   Joined: May 07, 2004
Last Visited: Nov 20, 2008
Location: between my hat and my shoe soles


contact

post
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:20 pm
sandown wrote:
In addition to the new turn back adjacent to the Up Main at Epping servicing platforms 1 and 2 I noticed, whilst working thru Cheltenham last Friday, Platform 2 at Cheltenham is also now signalled for turnbacks. Much the same as a terminator at Eastwood on the Down Main.


. . . except Cheltenham is still outside of Epping yard limits. So in order to turn back from the platform, a train needs a special proceed authority.

Railcleaning jobs going over that crossover are only going to the yard limits sign apparently due to this very reason. I imagine they'll fix this one up reasonably soon.

Mind you - I dont know why they installed a high speed crossover there, then only provided a shunting signal for the movement . . .

Anywho. In other news - the word is the Chatswood interchange will be commissioned in two stages during November. If that's true, then from around november 22 (IIRC) trains should start using the up platforms. I'll be on annual leave so I won't get to see it immediately. If it's fully commissioned, they'll be able to start using Chatswood as a turnback - that could be a rather handy capacity to have.
 
s
sandown Deputy Commissioner   Joined: Jan 24, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008
Location: sydney


contact

post
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:39 pm
nadnerb_2000 wrote:
sandown wrote:
In addition to the new turn back adjacent to the Up Main at Epping servicing platforms 1 and 2 I noticed, whilst working thru Cheltenham last Friday, Platform 2 at Cheltenham is also now signalled for turnbacks. Much the same as a terminator at Eastwood on the Down Main.


. . . except Cheltenham is still outside of Epping yard limits. So in order to turn back from the platform, a train needs a special proceed authority.

Railcleaning jobs going over that crossover are only going to the yard limits sign apparently due to this very reason. I imagine they'll fix this one up reasonably soon.

Mind you - I dont know why they installed a high speed crossover there, then only provided a shunting signal for the movement . . .

Anywho. In other news - the word is the Chatswood interchange will be commissioned in two stages during November. If that's true, then from around november 22 (IIRC) trains should start using the up platforms. I'll be on annual leave so I won't get to see it immediately. If it's fully commissioned, they'll be able to start using Chatswood as a turnback - that could be a rather handy capacity to have.


I'm certain Yard Limits will be extended before they start running trains but given it's 1.7kms between stations it's a long way to shunt. And the time lost if you did ' shunt ' would likely impact on other services. lol.



Innuendo is not Italian for suppository
 
s
nadnerb_2000 Chief Commissioner   Joined: May 07, 2004
Last Visited: Nov 20, 2008
Location: between my hat and my shoe soles


contact

post
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:32 am
sandown wrote:
nadnerb_2000 wrote:
sandown wrote:
In addition to the new turn back adjacent to the Up Main at Epping servicing platforms 1 and 2 I noticed, whilst working thru Cheltenham last Friday, Platform 2 at Cheltenham is also now signalled for turnbacks. Much the same as a terminator at Eastwood on the Down Main.


. . . except Cheltenham is still outside of Epping yard limits. So in order to turn back from the platform, a train needs a special proceed authority.

Railcleaning jobs going over that crossover are only going to the yard limits sign apparently due to this very reason. I imagine they'll fix this one up reasonably soon.

Mind you - I dont know why they installed a high speed crossover there, then only provided a shunting signal for the movement . . .

Anywho. In other news - the word is the Chatswood interchange will be commissioned in two stages during November. If that's true, then from around november 22 (IIRC) trains should start using the up platforms. I'll be on annual leave so I won't get to see it immediately. If it's fully commissioned, they'll be able to start using Chatswood as a turnback - that could be a rather handy capacity to have.


I'm certain Yard Limits will be extended before they start running trains but given it's 1.7kms between stations it's a long way to shunt. And the time lost if you did ' shunt ' would likely impact on other services. lol.


Actually it wont be 1.7km of shunting.

The shunt signal at Cheltenham is marked as being a repeater - it shows the indication of the shunt signal located just before the crossover. So as I understand it, the driver can pretty much travel as normal (once the yard limit is extended) past the repeater, until reaching the actual shunting signal. After that - as a shunt signal is no guarantee that the line ahead is clear - the train has to go at restricted speed until the next mainline signal indication.

Its still wasteful - if they'd put a mainline signal in with a "top yellow" indication, it wouldn't be a problem. But I spose that could still be possible in future.
 
s
Blackadder Chief Commissioner   Joined: Aug 06, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: The only underground station where you need a umbrella


contact

post
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:48 am
nadnerb_2000 wrote:
sandown wrote:
In addition to the new turn back adjacent to the Up Main at Epping servicing platforms 1 and 2 I noticed, whilst working thru Cheltenham last Friday, Platform 2 at Cheltenham is also now signalled for turnbacks. Much the same as a terminator at Eastwood on the Down Main.


. . . except Cheltenham is still outside of Epping yard limits. So in order to turn back from the platform, a train needs a special proceed authority.

Railcleaning jobs going over that crossover are only going to the yard limits sign apparently due to this very reason. I imagine they'll fix this one up reasonably soon.

Mind you - I dont know why they installed a high speed crossover there, then only provided a shunting signal for the movement . . .

Anywho. In other news - the word is the Chatswood interchange will be commissioned in two stages during November. If that's true, then from around november 22 (IIRC) trains should start using the up platforms. I'll be on annual leave so I won't get to see it immediately. If it's fully commissioned, they'll be able to start using Chatswood as a turnback - that could be a rather handy capacity to have.


From memory Nov 8 and 22 come to mind as the dates of the Chatswood commissioning.



Here or there
 
s
Inspector Chief Train Controller   Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Last Visited: Nov 26, 2008
Location: Just across the way from signal 43.9, Woy Woy.


contact

post
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 3:58 pm
nadnerb_2000 wrote:
.......there are very few "operational" staff involved in this - its mainly office type staff as I understand it. They want people who don't have expert knowledge of rail operations (I can hear the punchlines coming), to simulate "average joe" passengers.

They probably will have the railcorp fire brigade in etc, but most of the scenarios will probably involve emergencies/evacuations where the fire brigade doesn't respond. After all, it's in tunnel - in real life people aren't just going to sit there and wait for the fire brigade to rescue them if there is a fire.


That would appear to be the case - I was going to put my name down for the exercises, until I looked again at the blurb in "What's News", and saw that they wanted "non-operational" staff only (i.e: station staff need not apply). I immediately twigged why.

As for people just sitting there - time and again, I've been told in fire training that one of the biggest problems in evacuation is the "boiling frog syndrome" - people DO just sit there, even while the train fills with smoke...... Shocked



Special delivery - a berm........a BERM??!!!?



OLE (Order of Lithgovian Empire), Lithgovian New Years' Honours, 2008.
 
s
SL66 Train Controller   Joined: Jan 07, 2006
Last Visited: Nov 30, 2008
Location: Northbound on the Main South


contact

post
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:37 pm
Draft Timetables are beginning to appear at some suburban stations for 2009. They do not yet appear to be on the Cityrail website.

North Shore:
This will continue to have the 15 min schedule to Hornsby with every second train contiuing to Berowra.
Threaded into this service will be a 20 min frequency to Hornsby via Macquarie Park with the trains running express between North Sydney and St Leonards.

Main North:
The services will commence at Epping and the timetable only shows times to Central. No intermediate times are shown between Strathfield and Central.
There will be no suburban service between Hornsby and Strathfield. A change of trains will be necessary at Epping.
The existing frequency to Gosford/Newcastle will continue.



It took a team of professionals to build the "Titanic"
and a lone amateur to build the "Ark"
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Sydney Suburban
Page 3 of 7  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You can post new threads in this forum
You can reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©



Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2008 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.434 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.27%