Railpage Australia™
Diamond Valley Railway  
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/12
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

Yarra Glen Trestle

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Railway Archaeology
Page 1 of 1   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ]

Author Message
K-Class Locomotive Fireman   Joined: May 15, 2008
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:37 am
Recently I was out at the Yarra Glen trestle to take photos and measurements for the model I plan to build and noticed that the majority of the bridge(s) is built with 4 piles per cross head but mixed in with this are a few 2 piles per crosshead and a couple that have 3 piles.

Does anyone know why there is a mix of construction types within the same structure for no apparent reason.
 
s
wongm Minister for Railways   Joined: May 26, 2005
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: Geelong, Victoria


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 9:46 am
Could you see any relationship between number of piles and other attributes? Height from the ground? Some of the piles more rotten than others? Were they in groups or alone? Maybe they added more piles after the originals rotted, or perhaps the ground was softer in certain spots.



Marcus Wong

Railway Pics (and the chaff) Updated November 28th
Youtube videos
Rail Geelong: History of Geelong's Railways. Victoria's real Main Line.
 
s
perks Chief Train Controller   Joined: Apr 05, 2004
Last Visited: Nov 22, 2008
Location: Sunny Vic


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:26 pm
Reason is fairly simple, and is common to many early (pre 1900) trestle bridges in victoria.

YG trestle was originally built as a 502 x 15ft span bridge, with 2 pile piers and satellite outers on the bracing. As the line was upgraded to take heavier locos in the early 1900's, extra piles were added as required. This was initially outer piles on corners, but was progresivly added to up to the 1950's.

In the 1930's, with the first round of pile replacements becoming due, the maintainance on the bridge was too large to justify and the decision to fill in a large portion of the bridge was made. The bridge was split into 6 segments and backfilled with the assistance of a mechanical steam shovel. Extra land was purchased so that sufficient soil could be piled up to for the embankment. The soil was packed under the existing bridge until just below the deck. The crossheads and beams were then lifted, and track layed back onto the new soil. The new abutments were made with crossheads and beams recovered from the old bridge. Google Earths view of the bridge shows the bits which the steam shovel dragged the soil from, you can even see the staggered breaks in the pit, where it changed sides.

Works were almost finished when major flooding occurred in the valley in the mid 1930's this washed out another portion of the biggest segment, closing the line for 3 weeks. This segment was again filled with earth, and is the short join between the two biggest segments, 5 and 6.

As per VR practice, its still considered one bridge and keeps its old span numbers. Final numbers for Bridge 10 is 7 segments, segment one is spans 25-29(5), two is 120-124(5), three 203-213 (11 ), four 275-292(18 ), five 331-368 (38 ), six 378-434 (57) and seven 457-461(5).



This shows segment 7, still with 2 pile piers, modified to current drawings


This shows the end of segment 6, with both post 1936 4 pile piers and older satellite 2 pile piers. The closest pier (pier 430) shows the right hand side with original satellite and bracing, with the left having an outer pile.


This shows some of the varied spans that exist along segment 6


This shows a span on segment 5 not far from the yarra, with 2 piles in a raked formation. Not sure if this was a bridge gang "just because" change, but is certainly rare for the bridge, and the line as a whole.



http://photosbymatt.fotopic.net
My YVTR photo collection
 
s
K-Class Locomotive Fireman   Joined: May 15, 2008
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:32 pm
Thanks for that info Perks. That does make sence now.
 
s
yarra1949 Station Staff   Joined: Jun 20, 2007
Last Visited: Nov 17, 2008
Location: Heathmont Vic


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:50 pm
If you would like to learn more about the trestle bridges of the yarra valley why not come up to the YVR and give perks and the others a hand to repair the bridges. Also learn the skills and knowledge in the art of timber bridge building and repair.

Ray Williams.
 
s
Mel Junior Train Controller   Joined: Feb 26, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:12 pm
Bit of new wood and concrete foundations and off you go....
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Railway Archaeology
Page 1 of 1  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ]

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You cannot post new threads in this forum
You cannot reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©



Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2008 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.645 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.34%