Kind Regards
North Korea launched their first Intercontinental missile the other day, it travelled some 940km before landing, this is a serious escalation in this conflict, the U.S doesn't want a full scale war with the North, although, I have heard that Military options are being sought, I think if a Military strike was to occur with North Korea, I think it could be a very dangerous outcome!What conflict?
Kind Regards
True that, I didn't mean conflict, I meant situation, and yes I'm sure the US test their missiles, but we hear nothing of it!North Korea launched their first Intercontinental missile the other day, it travelled some 940km before landing, this is a serious escalation in this conflict, the U.S doesn't want a full scale war with the North, although, I have heard that Military options are being sought, I think if a Military strike was to occur with North Korea, I think it could be a very dangerous outcome!What conflict?
Kind Regards
If the USA carries out a missile test who are they in conflict with?
The difference is that the USA is supposed to be a rational country bound by numerous treaty agreements whilst Nth Korea is not rational and not bound by any of the usual civilized restraints. Frankly, I cannot see what can be done about Nth Korea and Kim knows that. I believe he wants a deal of some sort which will become apparent once he gets his big fire cracker topped by a big bunger perfected.North Korea launched their first Intercontinental missile the other day, it travelled some 940km before landing, this is a serious escalation in this conflict, the U.S doesn't want a full scale war with the North, although, I have heard that Military options are being sought, I think if a Military strike was to occur with North Korea, I think it could be a very dangerous outcome!What conflict?
Kind Regards
If the USA carries out a missile test who are they in conflict with?
So you would think, but how many countries has North Korea invaded in the last 20 years? And what about the USA?What conflict?The difference is that the USA is supposed to be a rational country bound by numerous treaty agreements …
If the USA carries out a missile test who are they in conflict with?
I know it's fashionable in certain circles to bash the Yanks. (I live in a wealthy, Green voting suburb, so by "certain circles", I mean many of my neighbours.) Gosh, with the current American president, even I'm tempted to abuse the Seppos.So you would think, but how many countries has North Korea invaded in the last 20 years? And what about the USA?What conflict?The difference is that the USA is supposed to be a rational country bound by numerous treaty agreements …
If the USA carries out a missile test who are they in conflict with?
...I know it's fashionable in certain circles to bash the Yanks. (I live in a wealthy, Green voting suburb, so by "certain circles", I mean many of my neighbours.) ...As it's fashionable to engage in "Green" and (supposedly) "Leftie" bashing, but that's the thing with generalisations
...But with the Kim dynasty's hereditary dictatorship, nothing is predictable except that they are confrontational and the welfare of it's own citizens has no influence on how the erratic regime will behave. That confrontational behaviour and the lack of predictability is what has caused alarmist people to run around in circles waving their hands in panic.And I happen to agree with you (again I hate generalisations). There's an end game to all this. If their little right wing regime is under threat he'll have no qualms about going out a hero in a puff of smoke.
My belief is the one country that wants the status quo with NK to remain is SK.I'd say China does too, as they won't want a deluge of refugees flooding in after the DPRK regime collapses.
The biggest question is the NK army. Most of the leaders and others know full well their army while large has very little capacity to take on anything serious apart from a ground war for a limited time, for which they will most likely be slaughtered by modern weapons in SK and USA. Physically most of them are weak and couldn't survive long periods in battle as they have minimal fat reserves and strength. As soon as there the slightlest hint of disorder in the NK chain of command, defection is likely to be ripe.The biggest problem is the artillery that the DPRK has aimed at Seoul, which can be put into play in just minutes and which have no form of defence. The only way to deal with that is via a preemptive strike, which will surely bring China into play.
Stalin and Hitler wouldn't have come close to having the control/loyalty he enjoys.He may well have great loyalty from the general public (which has no choice, anyway), but that means nothing. If the generals don't share that loyalty, Kim could still be in it up to his neck.
Subscribers: 8077, bevans, Big J, GeoffreyHansen, Pressman, RTT_Rules, speedemon08
We've disabled Quick Reply for this thread as it was last updated more than six months ago.