Railpage Australia™
Seymour Railway Heritage Centre  
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/12
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

Defence HQ spurs on new rail pan

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> ACT
Page 1 of 1   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ]

Author Message
Indefatigable Train Controller   Joined: Oct 21, 2005
Last Visited: Nov 9, 2008
Location: Canberra


contact

post
Posted: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:43 pm
Quote:
Canberra Times

DefenceHQ spurs on new rail plan
Andrew Fraser
Tuesday, 3 October 2006

Plans are afoot for a rail service - including a new spur line - linking Jerrabomberra to the Canberra and Queanbeyan stations, as well as the new $1.2billion Defence joint operations headquarters.
It is understood a local developer is assessing the feasibility of running a service, including the construction of track into Jerrabomberra, which is expected to be a dormitory suburb for many of the 750 people who are likely to move from Sydney to work at Headquarters Joint Operations Command.

Plans for the rail project have emerged as the 220ha site, 15km from Queanbeyan and 9km from Bungendore, is on the verge of receiving NSW Department of Environment approval.

The HQ has already got the federal go-ahead after an environmental impact statement and cultural heritage inspections.

The director-general of the project, Air Commodore Jack Plenty, said yesterday that the rail-upgrade plans had first beendiscussed with him about a year ago.

He believed that it would gather momentum as the headquarters stopped being seen by the public as a project and actually rose from the ground. Construction began last month and is due to be completed in the latter part of 2008.

Air Commodore Plenty said that environmental and cultural-heritage inspections had turned up a "rather rare" Aboriginal quarry and the foundations of the Hibernia Hotel, believed to have been a Cobb and Co stage post during the gold rush of the mid-19th century.

"Apparently, it's some rock outlines of footings of walls... our consultants are doing some more research to get us the story on the place."

Air Commodore Plenty said the railway developer would have to do its own study at its own commercial risk of putting a Defence HQ station on the Bungendore-Queanbeyan line.

Praeco, the private consortium that is to construct and run the Defence HQ building, is on the verge of submitting its design for the controversial road intersection linking the new project to the Kings Highway.

Air Commodore Plenty said it would be "one of the first things constructed" and Roads ACT's approval was expected inside a month.

Public notices would be published about the road changes.




If built I imagine the line would use something like the light-rail-vehicles that use heavy rail such as in Germany. Would be nice to see single-deck suburban rolling stock, who knows we may even see electrification in the ACT!

I reckon to have a serious suburban rail service for the ACT, you'd need to have it going to a few more locations than just Bungendore-Defence HQ-Queanbeyan-Jerrabomberra-Canberra. Perhaps that can come later on?
 
s
S-Truck Locomotive Fireman   Joined: Oct 18, 2004
Last Visited: Sep 19, 2007


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:43 am
Bob Winnel of the village Building Company is behind the proposal. Frank Pangallo (mayor - Queanbeyan) told the Jerrabomberra Residents Association last night that he is now against the plan.

The current travel time between Queanbeyan and Bungendore is 30 minutes by train. The Defence HQ is about halfway between the two, so lets say it would take 15 minutes to get there. Then add another 10 minutes to Jerrabomberra. About the time it takes to drive between the two. Of course you dont have to commute to to a train station first. I doubt that light rail could do the trip as easily.

Of course, you would want to maximise the number of people using the train from Jerrabomberra to the HQ. So you would run maximum load trains, once a day from Jerra. How many of the 750 staff who will work there would a) start at the same time in the morning and b) choose to live in Jerra? 50?

Defence is buying 350 properties in the Gunghalin area to house these new staff needed, with 150 properties spread around the rest of the ACT: hardly any in Jerrabomberra. Would make better sense to fix Macs Reef Road.

The NSW Government has stymied any further residential development around the Jerrabomberra area.

And if they payed a non-subidised fare it would cost them about $10 one-way (based upon the Countrylink website).

More from the Canberra Times 5/10/06 on this proposal can be seen on the business pages.
 


Last edited by S-Truck on Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:02 am; edited 2 times in total
s
Goninan Rider Locomotive Driver   Joined: Apr 23, 2006
Last Visited: May 24, 2008
Location: Nth Canberra, ACT/Nth Wollongong, NSW


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:04 pm
Wow, the best news us ACT Rail Gunzels have heard for about a hundred years (since Canberra was connected in the early 20's)!
Regardless of whether this is viable or not, if it does end up going ahead, it will set off a chain reaction leading to suburban rail travel in Canberra (hopefully).
 
s
S-Truck Locomotive Fireman   Joined: Oct 18, 2004
Last Visited: Sep 19, 2007


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:30 pm
Goninan Rider wrote:

Regardless of whether this is viable or not, if it does end up going ahead, it will set off a chain reaction leading to suburban rail travel in Canberra (hopefully).


How So?

The rail line is on the wrong side of Tuggeranong and the grades are not light rail standard. No-one will take a train to Civic from Tuggeranong siding when they can drive in a fraction of the time.

It wil take a substantial invenstment in public funding that the Government is not willing to do these days of increasing rates.
 
s
Indefatigable Train Controller   Joined: Oct 21, 2005
Last Visited: Nov 9, 2008
Location: Canberra


contact

post
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:46 am
Yeah, I strongly doubt the plan getting off the ground under its current allignment. It'd be nice, but I don't think it would happen.

As for other rail links in the ACT, the transport corridors are already in place for most areas that would qualify for light rail, such as Woden, Civic, Belconnen, Tuggeranong etc. (and you thought those nature strips were just there to look pretty), and suburban rail had featured in Walter Burley Griffin's original plans for Canberra.
 
s
M636C Chief Commissioner   Joined: Aug 18, 2005
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:11 am
There are a number of light diesel rail cars in current production in Europe that could be obtained for this service relatively quickly and cheaply.

If they are thinking of spur lines into Jerrabombera and the Defence centre near Bungendore (HQAST), it might be possible for many of the users to walk at both ends.

When personnel are transferred from Sydney or Melbourne to Canberra, many families have only one private car and public transport coordinated to Defence work times might be well received, particularly if Defence met the costs.

I don't think running a service to Kingston would be much use, but about twenty five years ago I checked out the old rail alignment across the Dairy Flats, and the ballast (such as there was) and sleepers were still there, along the line of the power cables that cross the same area.

The line appeared to pass through the old Brambles forwarding area alongside the present ARHS ACT Museum. If that line was restored as far as the edge of the lake/river, this would be walking distance from Russell Hill Offices if a pedestrian footbridge were put across the river (and possibly across the road as well). This could be made a stop on the existing Defence shuttle bus service (every ten minutes from Russell to Campbell Park) and a viable service from Jerrabombera to Russell and Russell to HQAST might exist, justifying maybe three or four trips a day at shift change times.

There has been a further power line put across Dairy Flats since I checked out the line, so some or all of the right of way may now not be available. Does anyone know?

M636C
 
s
S-Truck Locomotive Fireman   Joined: Oct 18, 2004
Last Visited: Sep 19, 2007


contact

post
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:20 pm
M636C wrote:

I don't think running a service to Kingston would be much use, but about twenty five years ago I checked out the old rail alignment across the Dairy Flats, and the ballast (such as there was) and sleepers were still there, along the line of the power cables that cross the same area.

The line appeared to pass through the old Brambles forwarding area alongside the present ARHS ACT Museum. If that line was restored as far as the edge of the lake/river, this would be walking distance from Russell Hill Offices if a pedestrian footbridge were put across the river (and possibly across the road as well).
M636C


Never going to happen. Jerrabomberra Wetlands http://www.environment.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/13195/cnpmapjerrabomberra.pdf is a protected site that would have every Greenie in Australia screeming blue murder if interferred with.

Note that the Causeway never was completed as such, where it would have been a dam across the wetlands linking Kingston to Russell. The only way a train is going to get there isby extending the Kingston line via a bridge next to Kings Ave, or rerouting it via Dairy Flat Road.

Here is a picture of the Causeway over present Canberra:
http://gallery.railpage.com.au/modules.php?set_albumName=S-truck&id=Burleytram6&name=gallery&include=view_photo.php
 
s
Goninan Rider Locomotive Driver   Joined: Apr 23, 2006
Last Visited: May 24, 2008
Location: Nth Canberra, ACT/Nth Wollongong, NSW


contact

post
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:11 pm
S-Truck wrote:
How So?

Well, although, I guess it is wishful thinking, but my ideology would be if a rail connection from Jerrabomberra to Queanbeyan, there may be increased pressure from the ACT residents demanding a rail connection of their own.

But, the most realistic option would be to re-commence passenger travel on the Bombala line, and re-open/refurbish Royalla Station, Or maybe even Tuggeranong Station, and provide a connection bus service there, which would require minimal construction, and still be considerably viable.
 
s
xplorer2501 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT


contact

post
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:24 pm
Royalla would be fine, there is a growing population there. But maybe not enough to sustain its own rail service. Tuggeranong Station is wigt on the edge of Tuggeranong, and not really in anyones way. More or less, it would be out of the way for people to travel to get a train from Tuggeranong Station to anywhere. Take me for example, I am in Monash (I can see where Tuggeranong Station is from my house), but to get there, even with a bus connection would recquire me to get one bus to Tuggeranong, another bus to the Station, get the Train from there to where ever the hell I need to go. At my destination I would probably need to get another bus or a Taxi to my location (unless I was at defence HQ). If I was working in Kingston or Civic it would be quicker to get a bus straight to that location from Monash. If I was going to Queanbeyan, I would be better off going to Woden and getting a Deanes bus to Queanbeyan.




"Who is this man?!" Major Hochsetter
 
s
Goninan Rider Locomotive Driver   Joined: Apr 23, 2006
Last Visited: May 24, 2008
Location: Nth Canberra, ACT/Nth Wollongong, NSW


contact

post
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:33 pm
I guess you are correct in saying so, xplorer2501.

In that case, the only posssible option for this to go ahead would to be to open a station closer to the Lanyon Dr overpass. Then, if Bus companies were to intervene, then a viable connection would be drawn out of that.
 
s
M636C Chief Commissioner   Joined: Aug 18, 2005
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:52 pm
S-Truck wrote:
M636C wrote:

I don't think running a service to Kingston would be much use, but about twenty five years ago I checked out the old rail alignment across the Dairy Flats, and the ballast (such as there was) and sleepers were still there, along the line of the power cables that cross the same area.

The line appeared to pass through the old Brambles forwarding area alongside the present ARHS ACT Museum. If that line was restored as far as the edge of the lake/river, this would be walking distance from Russell Hill Offices if a pedestrian footbridge were put across the river (and possibly across the road as well).
M636C


Never going to happen. Jerrabomberra Wetlands http://www.environment.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/13195/cnpmapjerrabomberra.pdf is a protected site that would have every Greenie in Australia screeming blue murder if interferred with.

Note that the Causeway never was completed as such, where it would have been a dam across the wetlands linking Kingston to Russell. The only way a train is going to get there isby extending the Kingston line via a bridge next to Kings Ave, or rerouting it via Dairy Flat Road.

Here is a picture of the Causeway over present Canberra:
http://gallery.railpage.com.au/modules.php?set_albumName=S-truck&id=Burleytram6&name=gallery&include=view_photo.php


I wasn't talking about the Causeway, which was a proposed permanent rail alignment but the actual rail alignment that was built about 1922. The alignment is still there and was (and I assume still is) used as a roadway to access the two sets of powerlines crossing the area.

If the "greenies" allowed construction of power lines with fifteen metre concrete towers, (which are much more visually intrusive) why would they object to new sleepers and rails being laid on the existing ballast on an existing alignment currently used occasionally by road vehicles?.

It's not as if the track hadn't already been there and still visible after fifty or so years!

M636C
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> ACT
Page 1 of 1  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ]

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You cannot post new threads in this forum
You cannot reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©



Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2008 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.860 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.41%