| home |
|
| news |
|
| discussions |
|
| content |
|
| site |
|
|
| technical support | Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!
Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.donation  Please Donate!photo comp Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?
Click Here!
Voting Closes 30/9search |
| |
| Author |
Message |
DavidB
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 11, 2003 Last Visited: Jan 25, 2007 Location: Canberra
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:29 pm
|
| Eleven Mile wrote: | | When approached and said that permission would be needed, what i would have done is gone with him to the SM and got permission. |
As has been stated previously, advice has been provided by CityRail, NSW Minister for Transport Services, NSW Attorney General and Commonwealth Attorney General that there is no prohibition on taking photographs in public places, permission to take photographs on railway property is not required unless photography is for commercial purpose. Police advised that transport companies are making up rules which are inconsistent with any security laws and if any transport employee claims photography is banned for "security" reasons then photographers should ask for somebody in authority to provide proof of such a law. Police also advised that if transport employees tried to forcibly stop photographers, then the photographer should request police to attend.
| Eleven Mile wrote: | | In the incident as you have stated above, i feel that they did what they are trained to do. |
If they have been trained to do that then senior management should be sacked for negligence. The station staff were in the wrong but did not appear to know this. If their conduct had gone beyond mere questioning, they could potentially have committed a criminal offence. As it was their conduct was bordering on harassment.
EDIT2: I repeat that all official advice is that photographers do not have to ask permission first and, if questioned, the photographer should (politely) correct the perception of employees if they claim photography is banned for security reasons or that you need to ask permission first. This is advice from government departments and police.
Cheers
David
Last edited by DavidB on Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:41 pm; edited 2 times in total
|
|
 |
parraeel
Train Controller
Joined: Jun 26, 2005 Last Visited: Sep 5, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:32 pm
|
|
Why did you go through all of that "hassle"? You probably could have left and returned later. By the way, if I notice people taking photos and or movies at my station, it doesn't worry me one bit. Doesn't happen often where I work but.
|
|
 |
Eleven Mile
Assistant Commissioner
Joined: Mar 22, 2006 Last Visited: Aug 6, 2006 Location: Appin
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:51 pm
|
| DavidB wrote: | | Eleven Mile wrote: | | When approached and said that permission would be needed, what i would have done is gone with him to the SM and got permission. |
As has been stated previously, advice has been provided by CityRail, NSW Minister for Transport Services, NSW Attorney General, Commonwealth Attorney Genera and police that there is no prohibition on taking photographs in public places and permission to take photographs on railway property is not required unless photography is for commercial purposes.
| Eleven Mile wrote: | | In the incident as you have stated above, i feel that they did what they are trained to do. |
If they have been trained to do that then senior management should be sacked for negligence. The station staff were in the wrong but did not appear to know this. If their conduct had gone beyond mere questioning, they could potentially have committed a criminal offence. As it was their conduct was bordering on harassment.
Cheers
David |
Yes, we all know that it isn't against the law at the moment as you have stated.
However, suspicious activity will be investigated, as it should be, and as you no doubt would agree. If the official who approached the man taking photos said the he needed to ask permission first, why create a scene, just go with him and get permission, permmission that would have been granted.
People who start quoting laws and telling Railway officials that they are wrong probably will get the third degree, as it is not behaviour that would be expected from just a tourist taking pictures.
I've got nothing against the man who posted the comment, however straight away i can see where his problems began, that was with his initial response to the Railway official.
My advice would be just to be easy going and leave quoting the law till when you stand before the beak. If he requests that you ask permmission, ask it. Why give yourself the hassles!!
Remember, they were worried that you were up to no good, and it's great to see as far as i'm concerned, that they confronted the person they thought was acting in a suspicious manner.
We should all be thankfull that they are keeping a watch over what is going on.
I've had an AK 47 machine gun pointed at me overseas while taking pictures next to a railway line, but when i explained what i was up too there was no problem at all. You could only imagine the bother i may have got into if i had started quoting the law to the man holding his gun at me.
Lighten up, and help keep us as safe as we can by helping these people, and if they say you need to see the SM, just go and tell him what you're up too, don't go quoting Hansard.
Cheers, Edward.
|
|
 |
biqua
Paper Tiger
Joined: May 10, 2005 Last Visited: Sep 7, 2008 Location: SRA Survey No. 14032
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 7:31 pm
|
| Eleven Mile wrote: | However, suspicious activity will be investigated, as it should be, and as you no doubt would agree. If the official who approached the man taking photos said the he needed to ask permission first, why create a scene, just go with him and get permission, permmission that would have been granted.
People who start quoting laws and telling Railway officials that they are wrong probably will get the third degree, as it is not behaviour that would be expected from just a tourist taking pictures. |
I couldn't agree more ... along the lines of what I was trying to say earlier on about being courteous, and being more likely to get a positive response.
|
|
 |
M636C
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Aug 18, 2005 Last Visited: Sep 6, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:46 pm
|
To reiterate what I said earlier, perhaps with amplification, the first junior assistant did go away for advice, and I said that I would be on the platform taking my photographs. When the second assistant arrived, I went to the SM's office directly with him as agreed.
Nothing I did was in any way suspicious. I had my camera in view at all times, and I offered to show them the images. At no stage did they ask to see what items of rolling stock or infrastructure I had photographed.
It was clear that they were not in the slightest concerned about security because they never checked my ticket and never asked my name or what I wanted to use the photographs for.
And remember that I had already been taking photos in the station for about an hour on platforms 1, 2 and 3, without anyone, staff or passengers even looking at me.
As long as I was only planning to bomb Countrylink services, nobody cared!
I tried to initiate discussions about my name, identity and purpose both with the second assistant and the SM but it was clear that they weren't interested. They didn't even want me to leave. All they wanted was for me to stop taking photographs.
One conclusion from this, viewed impassionately, might be that they, CityRail Central, (not me) had something to hide.
This was not staff reacting sensibly to a perceived threat. This was an inconsistent and slipshod response to a perfectly normal activity.
I have been taking photographs at Sydney Terminal and Central for more than forty years, and this was the first time that anyone even suggested that I should ask for permission.
M636C
|
|
 |
biqua
Paper Tiger
Joined: May 10, 2005 Last Visited: Sep 7, 2008 Location: SRA Survey No. 14032
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:36 pm
|
I really don't think you did anything technically wrong M636C, and I think the staff handled it very badly, so I don't want to to think I think otherwise. It just seemed from the first account you took a slightly more stand-offish approach, hence my comments.
The forty years comment certainly does make you think though, not to mention the fact you could prove your photos were published, but they took no interest.
|
|
 |
greenkayaker
Minister for Railways
Joined: Sep 20, 2005 Last Visited: Sep 5, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:46 pm
|
Duno what to say about all this at Central, except that the staff seem to be on a power trip. No policy or warnings have been issued about rabid photographers on stations!!! Hell, half of the staff I know carry cameras to work with them. I do. M, I think that you should go and speak to PR or media unit and try and get a sensible answer. I wonder if you were there with an offduty employee taking pics if you would both be chased off or if there are 2 sets of rules....
And then?????? 
|
|
 |
doridori
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Sep 21, 2005 Last Visited: Sep 6, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
Ron_D
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Aug 28, 2004 Last Visited: Aug 15, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:50 am
|
| doridori wrote: | too many times ive heard of official documents being ripped up in front of people so the proof "dissapeared"
also funny when a person of authority makes a fool of themselves trying to destroy it :p | Officially, I don't think they are allowed do that. But if that is the case, carry a few extra copies.
|
|
 |
doridori
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Sep 21, 2005 Last Visited: Sep 6, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:21 am
|
|
of course theyre not allowed to do it, yet that doesnt stop them trying does it !!!
|
|
 |
joe
Junior Train Controller
Joined: Mar 08, 2003 Last Visited: Sep 1, 2008 Location: Wetherill Park NSW
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:27 am
|
Hi All.
I have never had any problems at Central and have not asked but if
there were a Station Master on Duty that felt threatened by My presence
Then I would explain My self and ask is OK now if I take some photos
on Your Station.
The only 2 places I ever had trouble were Redfern and Olympic Park.
Redfern was 2004 when 3112 and 3526 were going to Valley Heights.
I went to Clyde to photograph them and the Station Master there was
good enough to let Me know that they were delayed due to the derailment
in Everleigh.Upon being told this My Son Myself and 3 other Mates decided
to catch the train to Redfern to see the trains coming from Everleigh to
Central.( Good in theory did not happen as their Trains were in Central
and the Engines came up through the Engine Dive)
There was a Station Assistant came down on to Platform 1 and said We
were not allowed to take photos on His Platform! So We all went up onto
The overhead concourse and I suggested We go and talk to the Station
Master which We did.The Station Master on hearing what his Station
Assistant said,Was not impressed and said We could take as many photos
as We like as it was not so and so's B_____ Station. He wanted us to sign a visitors book but after informing Him We had tickets and showed Him,
He said no need to sign the book.Did We get any photos? Yes
but only of the Engines running up out of the Engine Dive from Platform 2.
But wait there is more after the Engines had gone into Central We proceeded back up the stairs to go to Platform 4 as to catch a train back to Clyde.
At the top of the stairs We were again accosted by Grey Ghosts which had
been talking to the Station Assistant He was upset that We had permission
from the real Boss Man of the Station at that time in history,They thought
they would put there ten cents worth in.( Thats about all it was worth )
One of them tried to tell My Son to wait were He was walked up to Him and started to question Him.
I turned and went back a few steps and told My Son to hurry up as the train was arriving in the Platform,Then I pointed
to the Station Masters office and said You want to question someone Go
and talk to The Station Master and He will put You straight,We have a
train to catch. Having said this I had been to Redfern on many occasions before and never had an once of trouble the staff had always
been very helpful even to the extent that one morning they informed Me
that 3801 would not be on the main line as there was a signal failure at MacTown and would be on the suburban.
Olympic Park was a different story it happened when 8646 was tabled to
run through back in 2002.The Station Master on Duty was quite adamant
that He would not let us onto the platforms and even had a grey ghost that
was in His office come out a tell us We were not allowed to take photos.
But He made a goose of Himself by trying to say that it would not be
happening as the train was running 2 hours late,I then said something
like oh well We must have been photographing a ghost as We had
followed a train down the coast and back again and it has 8646 on the front,and that it was actually running dead on time if not a little early.
Then I said He could keep His station and left.
I must add here that at the time of the 150th the Station Master at Olympic Park was more than helpful.
I have been to several other stations in the Metropolitan area and not had an once of trouble.
Cheers
Joe.
Shunter
|
|
 |
banko_boy
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Apr 11, 2006 Last Visited: Sep 3, 2006 Location: Near Banko
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:09 am
|
Interesting story there Joe. Good to hear the Redfern SM was a good guy.
I once had a fat smeg stationmistress at Richmond who said I couldn't take photos. The argument lasted about 5 minutes and she couldn't provide any proof that I was not allowed to take photos. Makes ya wonder!
|
|
 |
WaterfallDJ
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Mar 17, 2005 Last Visited: Jun 20, 2006
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:24 am
|
What is this photo paranoia anyway?
What would a terrorist do with them anyway? Get a voodoo doctor to stick pins in them after a sacred ritual?
Some people really are thick
|
|
 |
DavidB
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 11, 2003 Last Visited: Jan 25, 2007 Location: Canberra
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:26 am
|
| Eleven Mile wrote: | | Yes, we all know that it isn't against the law at the moment as you have stated. |
You're missing the point. I'm not telling you what the law says, I'm telling you what ministers, police and CityRail management have said is the correct course of action.
| Eleven Mile wrote: | | However, suspicious activity will be investigated, as it should be, and as you no doubt would agree. If the official who approached the man taking photos said the he needed to ask permission first, why create a scene, just go with him and get permission, permmission that would have been granted. |
I am not going to go to the SM to get permission because CityRail has advised, in writing, that permission is not required unless the photographs are for a commercial purpose. I am not going to jump through the hoops made up by some employee.
| Eleven Mile wrote: | | People who start quoting laws and telling Railway officials that they are wrong probably will get the third degree, as it is not behaviour that would be expected from just a tourist taking pictures. |
The railway officials (CityRail management) told me, in writing, what I can and can't do and what to do if challenged by staff. It should therefore be up to the same officials to give their staff the same information.
| Eleven Mile wrote: | | If he requests that you ask permmission, ask it. |
I am not going to request permission because CityRail management, the Minister and police said, in writing, that I don't need to.
| Eleven Mile wrote: | | Remember, they were worried that you were up to no good |
If they are worried I'm up to no good, they are welcome to ask police to investigate. The police know the law.
| Eleven Mile wrote: | | We should all be thankfull that they are keeping a watch over what is going on. |
Correct, they do have a right and responsibility to keep an eye on things and to ask questions. But you are under no obligation to explain your actions beyond "I am a railway enthusiast". They do not have the right to prevent you taking photographs from public places.
| Eleven Mile wrote: | | I've had an AK 47 machine gun pointed at me overseas |
We're talking about Australia, not overseas.
| Eleven Mile wrote: | | Lighten up, and help keep us as safe as we can by helping these people, and if they say you need to see the SM, just go and tell him what you're up too, don't go quoting Hansard. |
The quote in Hansard was a direct result of an over officious transit employee claiming that photography was banned. The Minister was setting the record straight.
Cheers
David
|
|
 |
biqua
Paper Tiger
Joined: May 10, 2005 Last Visited: Sep 7, 2008 Location: SRA Survey No. 14032
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:51 pm
|
| WaterfallDJ wrote: | | What would a terrorist do with them anyway? Get a voodoo doctor to stick pins in them after a sacred ritual? |
You never know ... maybe that's why some trains leak when it's raining.
|
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
|
You can post new threads in this forum You can reply to threads in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group
Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
|
|