Railpage Australia™
  
No Clean Feed - Stop Internet Censorship in Australia
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/12
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

Northern Beaches railway line - why not

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Sydney Suburban
Page 1 of 5   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Author Message
redrats Junior Train Controller   Joined: Nov 28, 2006
Last Visited: Aug 11, 2007


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:49 pm
Why has there never been a extension from North Sydney station of Bradfield vision for the Northern beaches railway line since 1920s?

It would of been one of the best ideas and should still happen.

What is stopping it beyond political lack of will and helping the environment?
 
s
hurstville1 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: Where Belfordrocks isn't(aka:not Hurstville)


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:55 pm
Are you talking about the one from Dee Why-Cronulla because it is metioned in the Christie report for the super network for 2050  
s
blakjak Chief Commissioner   Joined: Aug 14, 2006
Last Visited: Jul 14, 2007
Location: Sid-en-aye, Ostralya


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:02 pm
Funny you ask this, I was reading my Forgotten City Railways book last night & I read up about this (I can scan teh page if you wish).
Bradfield originaly drew up the Warringah Railway at the same time as the City Railways, but before/during construction of the City Railway he revised his plans for a concrete super-highway (road) instead. Most of the reservation has been built on, only way it can be done now is using tunnels.



There is no 'L' key on keyboards...there was never any 'L' key anywhere, we have slaughtered them, there are 'L' keys laying all over the place drowing in their own blood...we will be victorious, Allah is on our side.
 
s
hornetfig Chief Train Controller   Joined: May 13, 2004
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:06 pm
redrats wrote:
What is stopping it beyond political lack of will and helping the environment?


Cost. Irrespective of the War, the cost would have likely always prevented its construction.
 
s
drwaddles In need of a breath mint   Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: Lifting the A-League trophy!


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:18 pm
Quote:
redrats wrote:
What is stopping it beyond political lack of will and helping the environment?


Arrow it would encourage more people to travel between the Warringah peninsula and other parts of Sydney, thereby making the existing problem worse
Arrow even if it could be justified on the grounds of providing for recreational traffic it would be abused by people to travel to and from work, thereby undoing the good planning which has seen Warringah peninsula's self-containment (in terms of employment) rise from 50% in 1976 to over 80% now
Arrow it would create massive pressure for more land to be opened up for urban development. The environmental costs and the costs of servicing this land make it less than desirable.
Arrow Studies have found that the demand is not there for a railway unless massive densification or urban development takes place

However, I am not dead against it. If any transport amplifications on such a scale were to be undertaken, a heavy rail line would be the one I support. I would have it running from Chatswood because I believe that is a more sustainable and desirable travel pattern to be fostering - it provides better connections to the west of Sydney and the high tech industry areas in Chatswood-Macquarie Park. It also prevents the city from being too CBD-focused.
 
s
redrats Junior Train Controller   Joined: Nov 28, 2006
Last Visited: Aug 11, 2007


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:24 pm
Last time i looked TRAINS reduced the road and air pollutrion massively.
I work with people who commute from Manly to CBD each day by bus and would prefer a train instead.

Everyone on a train is 1 less car on a road.
 
s
JoeT Chief Train Controller   Joined: Dec 08, 2004
Last Visited: Nov 29, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:28 pm
You ask "Northern Beaches railway line - why not". There is only one answer - money.
Who would pay for it? No modern government would. A major PPP would be it's only hope.
They can't afford to maintain the network they have already let alone take on such a large construction project.
 
s
drwaddles In need of a breath mint   Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: Lifting the A-League trophy!


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:38 pm
Quote:
Last time i looked TRAINS reduced the road and air pollutrion massively.
I work with people who commute from Manly to CBD each day by bus and would prefer a train instead.

Everyone on a train is 1 less car on a road.


That's not a good reason to be introducing a rail line. The point of one would be to serve people who currently drive, rather than pinching passengers from other modes.

That is good PT myth - everyone on a train is 1 less car on a road. You don't think at least 1 person on that train would be someone who would have caught the bus service previously?

And I must ask - why not the ferry? it is significantly quicker. Although its frequency is (or at least was when I used to catch it a few years ago) pretty ordinary.

Oh and btw I was up at Avalon for mothers day yesterday - I was very impressed and surprised to see that the L90 was running on a 15min frequency on a Sunday afternoon!! That's almost unheard of in Sydney!
 
s
Syd3642 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Dec 12, 2006
Last Visited: Nov 2, 2008
Location: Sydney


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:39 pm
NO SPACE Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation Where the heck would you put double tracks Question
Tunnels maybe BUT - The Spit Rolling Eyes New bridge. (eyesore) local resists.
Tunnel under = Costs to much. Then what Exclamation Follow the old tram lines. (to steep) We don't need more congestion on the Military Road.



ARHS NSW Division Member
ILRM Member
Proud owner of S.K Railways
Music person playing my Tuba down a long road
and Composing a New Symphony.
Chief RP First Aid Team

My own Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/22985259@N06/
 
s
aamslfc Chief Train Controller   Joined: Mar 26, 2007
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:42 pm
Money, as it would most likely be built completely underground.

According to Christie, the line would become the Central Metro line, stretching from Dee Why to Cronulla via Chatswood, Wynyard, Newtown and Sydenham.

I'd much rather build a North-West rail line going from Rouse Hill to La Perouse via Baulkham Hills, Wynyard, Pitt Street, Central, and UNSW.
 
s
Syd3642 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Dec 12, 2006
Last Visited: Nov 2, 2008
Location: Sydney


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:48 pm
aamslfc: said 'stretching from Dee Why to Cronulla via Chatswood, Wynyard, Newtown and Sydenham'.

From Dee Why Question
So Mosman and Neutral bay are missed out Exclamation That's f*ck smeg.

Why Dee Why Question couldn't they extend to Palm Beach Question



ARHS NSW Division Member
ILRM Member
Proud owner of S.K Railways
Music person playing my Tuba down a long road
and Composing a New Symphony.
Chief RP First Aid Team

My own Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/22985259@N06/
 
s
drwaddles In need of a breath mint   Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008
Location: Lifting the A-League trophy!


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:54 pm
Quote:
Why Dee Why couldn't they extend to Palm Beach


The 12 people that live at Palm Beach are sure to be outraged!

Seriously though, there becomes a point where a railway line becomes too expensive for the number of people it would serve. There is also the issue of terminating the railway line at a point that allows efficient use of feeder buses. For me, that point is either Dee Why or Mona Vale - however, I can see that going any further than Dee Why would start to make such a proposal less and less economical.

Furthermore, the terrain north of Mona Vale is not very hospitable for railway construction!
 
s
5915 Assistant Commissioner   Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Last Visited: Nov 29, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 8:27 pm
Without a good knowledge of the current traffic volumes from the northern beaches area, the idea of integrating a light/heavy rail connection under the harbour from around Manly with connection with the ESR may be completely out of proportion to the costs involved. However, with intensification of population, this may get around the difficulties of finding a suitable route across to Chatswood/St Leonards and further contributing to congestion of the existing North Shore Line.

A rail link starting around Mona Vale and continuing to Manly with bus feeders down this spine may well obviate the need for more expensive and intrusive solutions requiring additional land resumptions and dislocation of the existing amenity along the northern beaches and adjoining suburbs.

5915
 
s
Ben_Daui Assistant Commissioner   Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 8:36 pm
I agree on this one as Bondi Junction would become like what Chatswood has become (T Junction). Build the unfinished Eastern Subs line to Port Botany & La Perouse & bridge it /Tunnel across Botany bay but the NIBYS of Kurnell may oppose this as they are not for change. As for the Northern Beaches tunnel from Bondi Junction North via Rose Bay, Vaucluse, Mosman, Spit Bridge, Seaforth/Balgowlah, Fairlight, Queenscliff, Harbord then up to Palm Beach & may be go on further to the Central Coast.



Member 1058
SETS member 461
 
s
aamslfc Chief Train Controller   Joined: Mar 26, 2007
Last Visited: Dec 3, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 8:51 pm
Syd3642 wrote:

From Dee Why Question
So Mosman and Neutral bay are missed out Exclamation That's f*ck smeg.

Why Dee Why Question couldn't they extend to Palm Beach Question

Patronage? Palm Beach already has Limited Stops/Express bus services from Wynyard, which are relatively full in the afternoon peak (the only time I see them). I don't know if there would be sufficient patronage up there to sustain an expensive train line.

I'll give you the full line:

Dee Why
Brookvale
Beacon Hill
Frenchs Forest
Forestville
Roseville Chase
Chatswood
Willoughby
Naremburn
Crows Nest
Victoria Cross (Nth Syd)
Walsh Bay
Wynyard
Sussex Street
Haymarket
Glebe
Sydney Uni
Newtown
Enmore
Sydenham
International Airport
Brighton-Le-Sands
Monterey
Ramsgate
Sandringham
Sylvania
Miranda
Caringbah
Woolooware
Cronulla.
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Sydney Suburban
Page 1 of 5  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You can post new threads in this forum
You can reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©



Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2008 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.500 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.33%