



Some of those who carry a bike on a train have to cycle some great distance when they reach their destination station, given poor PT connection availability, frequency and routes in outer suburbs. They are not necessarily lazy either.
Let's talk prams. I can recall the time when pushers had to be folded to be transported on peak hour trains and prams were banned. We have gotten over that, despite prams getting much bigger.
I know that railway capacity takes some time to add, so why are the published plans seeking only to solve problems one year at a time ? If we need to add about 10-20% capacity every year, why are we doing so little about it ? It seems we are trying hard to get people off PT - come at a different time, do not bring your bike, etc.
What is the plan beyond the next 3 years ? How many new trains after the next lot ? What signalling upgrades ? What line duplication ? When will lines be extended ? When will additional stations be added ?
With VicRoads, they have plans already drawn up to last another 20 years. they have no troubles finding things to spend money on.




I think the reason we haven't seen much action on increasing capacity is because until probably 2006, nobody in power realised that public transport was really a problem. Yes, there's the weekly whinge fest from all those losers who don't want to drive a car, they thought.
Even MOTC was (in my personal opinion) written to be a well-disguised crumb thrown to the whingers to quieten them down for a bit.
So now that they really want to do something about it, they're conducting a thorough medical examination of the system. What do they find? Practically nothing is as it should be. Even the things that are good (eg the new trains, the new track on Route 75, etc) are only somewhat good, there are problems with them that will need to be fixed before we can say we have a world-class system.
So there's a bit of depression in political circles - "Where do we start?". Buying new trains was where they decided to start, and it's a good start, but it needs to be backed up by serious investment in infrastructure.
Possibly Kosky is feeling like a surgeon who knows her patient has a one in 50 chance of surviving, that if it dies on the operating table she'll be up with a malpractice suit, but that if she refuses to operate she'll be up for malpractice anyway. She's taking several deep breaths and gripping her scalpel hard to stop her hand from shaking.


I had to travel on peak period with my bike the middle of last year due to lack of suitable public transport at the connecting end (I was working in a factory estate), and most of the time you can stick the bike in 'deadspace' in the carrige, such as between the carriges in the newest trains. Not many people will stand there. Or along the back of the 3 row seats where the disabled seat is.
There are places to put your bike that don't get in the way. If you are joining an already crowded train, its a bit hard tho.




Hi all, first post...I'm a regular PT-user and sometime bike rider.Basically i avoid peak-hour, mainly cos it's commonsense and I can't fit!
However, the alternative of parking my bike at the station is basically useless.Those bike boxes are a stupendous waste of money in my opinion.
Yes you can lock your bike in one.
If you can get one!!! The problem with these boxes is they are registered exclusively to ONE user for 1 or more years (presuming they get reissued if requested-?). So the average scenario, at the stations blessed with their presence, is a specific small group of individuals get to lock up their bike. BUT nobody else can in a secure manner.Take a look under the door and in most cases they are empty.$1000's per Box being used a minor part of the possible time.
Imagine if you couldn't get on the train cos 'your' pre-registered carriage hadn't arrived.
I think what we need are some form of secure parking solution that can be used by a far larger pool of people, provide security gladly with deposit or whatever. There. got that off my chest... Tash



Welcome tasha ![]()
Well spoken as well. I fully support moves for more secured cycle parking. It's one thing to have sheds / racks / cages at almost every station but they are invariably unsupervised and often outside the sweep of the security cameras as well.
I have no confidence what ever that if I left my bike parked there that it would still be there, or that all of it would be there and in a roadworthy condition, several hours later when I returned.




Well said. The issue needs some proper attention as in real terms, commuters who combine bike travel with trains are moving in the best direction for our environment.
I am lucky to live a few minute's walk from a station, but for those in the outer suburbs, there may be few other choices, and this new rule just forced them back into their car (if they have that luxury).
Some of the most recent "bus roll-outs" to places like Pakenham and Epping North are quite pitiful really- an hourly service at peak hours which doesn't even connect properly to a train. What needs to be kept in mind is that for people in these areas (or a family who don't want to buy a second car), their rail frequency is hourly, because they have to get to the train first, and they can only access those which connect to the bus.
A case in point is Epping North where someone decided the bus would leave the area exactly on the hour, each hour. The 7.00 bus will get a commuter to the city at 8.10, the 8.00 bus at 9.10 respectively. You wouldn't want a 9.00 a.m. start in the CBD with those times.
The bus roll-out has worked in some areas, but in others its effect is political more than anything else.



I often cycle to the nearest premium station on weekends because my nearest station has only a 2-hourly service and the closest bus route to home runs just a single trip one way only on Saturday mornings - that's it for the whole weekend!
There are other buses within 10 minutes' walk but 10 minutes' walk plus the 5 minute allowance to wait at the bus stop is the same time as it takes me to ride the 6kms to town.
I have better transport options through the business week and don't need the bike on weekdays. Which is just as well because I could no longer take it with me now, and there isn't room for it on my trains anyway.
We have had our local bus service review and await the outcme. I agree that some outcomes have been more a case of political expediency than customer-friendly so I await our results with interest.




Welcome tasha, join the club of happy sensible bike/PT users!
If you keep asking the staff at your station about having a bike locker, something might happen. They can talk to the people who currently hold them and ask whether they are still using them. If there's enough people asking they might even install more.
It never hurts to ask!

I Google Adrian Webb plus bike ban and I got back the following websites:Note Google is so great
http://groups.google.com/group/aus.bicy ... 6dc0e437c5
Lets me just say that if its dark in the arvo, the rain hits hard, theroads are REAL nasty I'm telling the wife to get the train still home withher bike instead of riding home that night. We will cop any fine they wantto throw at us or action taking as its still better than the worst casescenario of her on the roads in those conditions. And I trust her skillson the road, its just all the other nuts I don't trust and see daily.
I take it when the new trains are here we are allowed back on?
Here is the response about the bike scapegoat issue we are facing.
"Thank you for your feedback to Metlink regarding bikes on trains.
During the last two years, patronage has increased by 23% on Connex trainservices. Patronage is expected to continue to increase and a number ofsteps are being taken to increase the capacity of the train network toenable more passengers to be carried.
The Victorian government has recently announced an order for 18 newsuburban trains and 22 new V/Locity carriages. However, growing patronagehas meant that a number of difficult operational decisions were required tomaximise the number of passengers that can be carried on peak hourservices. It is expected that the removal of bikes from the most congestedparts of the network during peak hours will enable more passengers to becarried, providing significant environmental and community benefits.
The restrictions for bikes are highly targeted and only apply to bikestravelling in the peak direction during peak times. For Connex trains, theban only applies to services within Zone 1. Customers will continue to beable to travel at off-peak times and in the counter peak direction withoutrestrictions. Similar rules exist in other Australian suburban trainnetworks, including Brisbane and Perth.
The Victorian Government and the public transport industry strongly supportthe use of public transport in conjunction with cycling and regret the needto restrict bikes from peak hour trains. Public transport users areencouraged to continue to use bikes in conjunction with public transport byleaving their bikes at the station at peak times and taking their bikes ontrains during off-peak times. (who wants to leave a good bike at a stationall day, day in day out at the same time each day in most areas?)
Lockers are provided at many Connex and V/Line stations.(Rubbish) Rentalfees forlockers have been eliminated, with only a refundable deposit now required.Fees for the carriage of bikes on public transport have been eliminated.CCTV coverage at stations reduces the chances of theft. Six carriage trainsare now operated on the majority of off-peak services, providing more roomfor bikes during the day, at night and on weekends.
The Victorian Government recognises that there is more work to do inrelation to bicycle storage at stations. The Department of Infrastructureis working with Connex and Bicycle Victoria to implement a bike cagestorage facility at a suburban station as a trial. If successful(100 bikesNOT stolen) , more bikecages are likely to be implemented.
Thank you for raising this matter with the Public Transport Division.
Yours sincerely
Adrian WebbVictorian Fare Policy Manager
Interesting to see this page on the Metlink web site:
For example, this means that if you are travelling from Flinders Street Station to Brighton Beach Station at 7.30am or from Yarraville Station to Melbourne Central Station at 5pm, a customer can carry a bike on a train.
Hmmm... Given most trains serving Yarraville in the PM peak don't go around the loop, I'd like to see you go from Yarraville to Melbourne Central at that time without having to change onto a peak direction train at some stage. I'd assume Flinders St to Melb Cen, or Southern Cross to Melb Cen would both be defined as "outbound"...
Daniel




Yes, i guess. It does add to what i originally saidIE bikes can't really currently fit on Z1 peakbound trains.Good news re the secure parking trial being done at Eltham Station.Where can I order one for my station? ![]()
I gather Bicycle Victoria are attracting some heat from their own membership over this, as seen on some other forums I have recently discovered, but I can't help thinking the 'pragmatic' approach they are taking (or not? I must admit I'm a bit naive of them) on this is in the ballpark of being the right tack to take.
Don't get me wrong (Daniel), the new ban is really bad, but i wonder if there are any stats on how many people this really affects and how many others it is discouraging from giving riding to/from the train a go?



A really very small number indeed.
From the Herald Sun, Wednesday 9th January 2007.
Geraldine MitchellJanuary 09, 2008
RAIL staff are refusing to force commuters to get their bikes off peak hour trains as the State Government's ban descends into a farce.
Industry sources yesterday said that the ban was unpopular and unworkable.
The Herald Sun last month revealed the Government would ban bikes on peak-hour Connex and V/Line trains from January 1.
The decision was hidden in a government document and published on the Metlink website.
A government spokesman said commuters would not be fined but urged rail staff to take a common-sense approach and advise passengers of the rule.
However sources said it was impossible to enforce the ban without official warnings or fines.
"Authorised officers, station staff, conductors -- none have the power to enforce it, so they're just not doing it," a source said.
Acting Premier Rob Hulls said: "There's been no decision made about rescinding (the ban). The fact is passengers on trains want to be able to travel in comfort."
However Public Transport Users Association president Daniel Bowen said: "Given no fine has been specified and because of the way it applies to peak services, the ban is almost unenforceable.
"V/Line's definition of peak hour includes all trains into Melbourne before 9am.
"So . . . even people boarding a train leaving Geelong at 5am and arriving in Melbourne around 6am can't take their bicycle."
V/Line's Daniel Moloney said its ban operated since January 1.
Mr Moloney also said V/Line had no plans to ask the Government to reverse the decision.
Connex spokeswoman Kate De Clercq said staff had been told to advise passengers of the law.
Geraldine MitchellJanuary 09, 2008
......However Public Transport Users Association president Daniel Bowen said: "Given no fine has been specified and because of the way it applies to peak services, the ban is almost unenforceable.........




However, the alternative of parking my bike at the station is basically useless.Those bike boxes are a stupendous waste of money in my opinion.
Yes you can lock your bike in one.
If you can get one!!! The problem with these boxes is they are registered exclusively to ONE user for 1 or more years (presuming they get reissued if requested-?).
I believe some of the info you provided needs to be scrutinised. My response includes the correct information. As I have a bike locker, but can justify it too ![]()
It is a $100 REFUNDABLE bond. Meaning I pay $100 upfront, when i'm done with it - they give me back the $100 dollars (assuming, I haven't damaged it or anyfink). It's a bit like a long-term deposit.*
Secondly - hire term is per three months. Renewable at any time. (Though I haven't bothered to renew my lending time; they will contact me if they require anything. One thing I have difficulty in doing is keeping my reciept... (It's somewhere in a shoebox of tax related jargon). They just require ID from you.
Connex: "You can book lockers at premium stations for three months at a time, and renew without paying any additional bond. And any items stored in lockers remain your responsibility.
If your station is a non-premium station, you must go to your nearest Premium Station.
---
One thing that irritates me, and which led me to purchase a bike locker is - if left on station premises is that Connex claim to have limited liability on the bike. My seat got stolen, my bell has been pretty much ripped off.
In theory there is partial responsibility as it occurred on DOI/Connex property - hence, they may hold certain liability. But I couldn't be bothered to suss things out. Though i was extremely shat at the fact I had no seat to ride on.
*Throughout the hire period, you gain access to a bike locker, and gain 0% pa. interest on your deposited money.




Found at: http://www.whitehorseleader.com.au/arti ... _news.html
Cyclists Jacques Fievez, Barry McCaig, Bruce Dite, Marion Winton and Russell Hick will have to avoid taking their bikes on the train during peak hours. Picture: STEVE TANNER
CYCLING groups have described Connex's snap decision to ban bikes on all peak-hour trains as a backward step.
Connex made the shock announcement just a day before the ban took effect on January 1, giving the public no warning to absorb a move it says was in response to crowded trains.
The new rules prevent cyclists from taking their bikes on to Zone 1 metropolitan trains during peak hours, from 7-9am and 4-7pm.
Whitehorse Bicycle Advisory Committee secretary Robin Friday said Connex's decision was "disappointing", given the push for sustainable forms of transport.
"The trains are overcrowded but to place a ban on bikes on trains seems to be a backward step to me," he said.
He said more bike facilities were essential, especially at Box Hill railway station, which had fewer bike lockers and hooks than the less-patronised Mitcham station.
Seasoned cyclist and eastern suburbs resident Ray Peace condemned the measure, saying more lockers and cages at stations was not the answer.
"It would help, but only to a limited degree; it's OK if you don't need to ride at the other end but if you want to ride your bike at both ends you're stonkered." Mr Peace said.
Bicycle Victoria has campaigned for more bike storage at suburban stations, with less than a third of Melbourne's 200 stations featuring secure bike lockers.
Mr Peace said banning bikes was a "backward step" and the real fault lay with the public transport system "a 19th century railway system trying to cope with the demands of the 21st century".
Barry McCaig of Whitehorse Cyclists said members of his group were mainly retirees so the ban was not inconvenient.
Mr McCaig said bikes could be awkward and less bulky alternatives included fold-up bikes.
Connex said no penalties would apply for offenders in the first few months of the bans.



Accepting that there will be a few people seriously inconvenienced by this ban, but only a few, are we really going to let the tail wag the dog on this one?
Very few public transport operators that I am aware of permit unrestricted and free conveyance of cycles during with-flow business peak hours.
Despite beibng a cyclist myself I don't see why Melbourne has to be any different.
There are system capacity issues and localised line capacity constraints which need to be addressed, but they need to be dealt with first and foremost so that the ever and fast-growing number of passengers can be conveyed safely. Whether they are then permitted to take relatively large and cumbersome objects with them (cycles and surfboards are both subject to this ban) can be looked at when additional capacity has been provided.
Currently on most lines and many peak trains passengers are required to travel in conditions which would be unlawful for sheep or cattle, such as extreme overcrowding, not permitted access to refreshement (though BYO is OK), and often in hot to stifling conditions.
Let's fix the basics then look at whether any frills can be added back. I still suspect that only a very small number of people indeed will be really seriously impacted by this. Even one of the cycle lobby groups has said
A really very small number indeed.
Yep, pretty much.
As I see it, there are three main groups of concern:
There are those who take their bike on the train because their station has no adequate secure bike parking. Either there are no lockers (remember, most stations don't have them) or all the lockers are already occupied. In some cases there may be low-income earners who can't afford the (up to) $100 deposit. Yes, DOI/BV are trialling a bike cage, which should increase capacity markedly, though some cyclists are wary of such facilities. And I do wonder just how long this trial is going to take, because IIRC they've been talking about it for some years now. But anyway, providing more secure bike parking, probably solves their problem.
Secondly there are those who genuinely need to take their bike on the train, because they use it both to the station and at their destination. I'm hearing about examples such as bike couriers, builders from country towns who ride from job to job around Melbourne, that kind of thing.
The third group is all those many cyclists who normally ride all the way to and from work, but occasionally need to use the train to get their bike home, because of sudden illness, adverse weather, mechanical failure, etc, and they don't really want to have to wait up to 3 hours to do that.
My understanding is that the twice-yearly passenger surveys indicate that each peak hour there are relatively few people with bikes on the trains, so banning them outright inconveniences them while not making a big difference in terms of overall passenger numbers/crowding.
(Then there's those people who will take their bikes on metro trains, ban or no ban, because they ignore the rules and/or know they're virtually unenforceable. They'll get away with it in most cases, too.)
Daniel



I would be interested to hear an official definition of "Surfboard".
We have talked about bikes but surfboards are also within the ban. Just as a "bicycle" can be defined in more than one way so can a surfboard.
I can understand that longboards would be outlawed as they are very large objects to take onto trains. What of shortboards? Does it make a difference if they have fitted fins or not? Can I still take my bodyboard along with me? Children's board-style training floats?
All can be defined as "surfboards". I would expect the number of surfboards travelling to / through the banned area with peak flow might be even smaller then the number of cyclists but it would be helpful if some sort of clarification were to be advised.
I drove coaches and buses in a surfing area of the UK for a number of years. Our ruling there was that no longboards nor any board with rigid fins would be conveyed (at any time, account the lesser space in a bus). Boogie boards and shortboards without fins were conveyed "subject to space being available" in the luggage bin but in practice were never refused. The intending passenger knew before boarding exactly what the rules were; in my years there I never heard of any disputes or arguments.

Rural cyclists criticise bike ban
Posted January 9, 2008 13:36:00
Regional Victorian cyclists are calling for country train services to beexcluded from a new bicycle ban.
Bikes are not allowed on metropolitan peak hour trains and will bebanned on regional V/Line services from February.
Former Bendigo councillor Laurie Whelan rides to work every day andoften takes his bike to Melbourne on the train.
He says the new velocity regional trains have room for bikes and theVictorian Government's decision does not make sense.
"It's a step backwards in the sense that people are using thatcombination of cycling and public transport because you can get around alot quicker and easier when you use that combination," he said.
Mr Whelan says there is a strong case for country services to beexcluded from the new rule.
"As far as I'm aware the connex trains don't have a specific compartmentwhereas the new velocity trains do," he said.
"If it is not a velocity train then it's the loco carriage set and theyhave a guard's luggage compartment."
A keen cyclist from Castlemaine, Jill Gibson, says the ban is a blow forpeople trying reduce their reliance on cars.
She says central Victorian cyclists will lobbying hard in the next threeweeks to try to get the State Government to reverse the ban.
"I'm hoping that within that time what it means is that they willreconsider the whole situation and have the ban lifted totally and thenhopefully a better system and future plan put in place," she said.
She says many cyclists have been floored by the decision.
"I could see no sense or value to anyone or the State, or for the impacton greenhouse gases and to people lifestyles," she said.
"It was an unbelievable and not well thought out decision."



It looks like they're buying bike lockers from Perth!
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/ ... 44303.html
Transperth's cycling integration manager Jim Krynen said a car park survey found 60% of motorists drove less than two kilometres to their preferred station. And 40% had driven less than 800 metres to the station.
Mr Krynen said the new cages had increased the rates of cycling to the station. "Initially, looking at the commute element and boosting the modal share in cycling, that short two to three-kilometre trip to the station is not a sweaty activity. It's convenient and it adds to sustainability and the rider's health," Mr Krynen said.
Perth riders will eventually have access to the cages through their SmartRider card - similar to the myki card under development in Victoria - and receive discounted fares for cycling.
Bicycle Victoria facilities development manager Jason den Hollander said the cage offered more flexibility to more users than the lockers, which can only be used by one person. "In the long term, we think this type of solution is a winner," he said.
A department spokesman confirmed the trial and said the cage will feature more secure access and significantly larger storage than the 930 bike lockers and 790 bike racks in use across Melbourne's metropolitan train network.




Found at: http://www.mooneevalleyleader.com.au/ar ... _news.html
Moonee Valley Bicycle Users Group vice president Frank Kinnersley wants lockers at train stations after bikes were banned from peak hour services. Picture: Derrick Den Hollander
MORE bike lockers are needed at Moonee Valley train stations to cope with a bike ban on peak-hour trains, a local cycling group says.
Two weeks ago the State Government announced bicycles would not be allowed on zone 1 services that arrive in Melbourne between 7am and 9am or leave Melbourne between 4pm and 7pm.
A statement on the Connex website said the Government decision was in "direct response to increased patronage".
Moonee Valley Bicycle Users Group vice-president Frank Kinnersley, pictured, said the group was disappointed by the decision.
"We think there are other things that can be done to ease crowding problems, like having a place to store bikes on trains would make more room for passengers," he said.
Public Transport Users Association president Daniel Bowen agreed, saying the ban was a "knee-jerk reaction" that would not make a difference.
"There is a crowding problem on Melbourne's trains but banning certain passengers is not the way to go. The Government should be looking for other solutions."
Mr Kinnersley said some commuters needed to ride at both ends of their journey, travelling suburb to suburb and not just into the city. More station lockers would be needed if the Government and Connex insisted on separating users from their bikes.
North Melbourne, Newmarket and Essendon are the only Moonee Valley stations with lockers.
Mr Kinnersley said stations from Essendon outwards would benefit from additional lockers.
Cyclists could have a bike at both ends of their journey if they chose with more lockers systemwide.
However, Department of Infrastructure transport communications manager Drew Douglas said there were no immediate plans to introduce or increase lockers at any of Moonee Valley's stations.
"A new secure bike parking cage, which has a significantly larger storage capacity than lockers or racks, is being trialled at Eltham Station in 2008," he said.
"Consideration will be given to introducing bike cages at other stations pending the outcome of the trial."




Found at: http://www.northcoteleader.com.au/artic ... _news.html
CYCLISTS from Darebin are calling for the State Government to rethink its ban on bikes on trains during peak hours.
Darebin Bicycle User Group spokesman Robin Gallagher said trains in countries such as Germany had designated bike-carrying areas fitted with special racks that kept the bikes from encroaching on passenger space.
"It is important that transport infrastructure keep pace with increasing rates of bike use and for an integrated service to be provided", Mr Gallagher said.
"Bikes need to be seen as part of transport rather than as a recreational toy".
He said options the Government could consider included taking out seats at one end of a carriage and providing hooks.
Thornbury cyclist Julie McDonald, 48, said she had been riding to Glen Iris to work every day after the doctor told her it was the best way to fend off arthritis.
After being on her feet all day in her mail-room job, she caught the train home with her bike.
Ms McDonald said the bans, in place since January 1, had forced her back into her car because she could not ride the 20km to Thornbury after work.



In the past two weeks there seems to have been both no reduction in the number of bike aboard "banned" trains nor any attempt by anyone to stop them.
Barrier staff at Flinders Street have simply opened gates and permitted cyclists into the station at 5pm at a time when all departures will be on the "banned" list.
They would not be heading for V/Line trains as currently there are none operating from Flinders Street.




Found at: http://www.starnewsgroup.com.au/story/53439
A KNOX City councillor has labelled a bicycle ban on peak-hour train services as a Band-Aid treatment for the overcrowding of the public transport system.
Tirhatuan Ward councillor Mick Van de Vreede said the ban would force Knox cyclists back into their cars.
Many Knox residents are doing the right thing by combining riding to work with a trip on pubic transport, he said.
But under a State Government ban, from 1 January, bicycles are not be permitted on train services travelling through Zone One and arriving in Melbourne between 7am and 9am and on trains departing between 4pm and 7pm.
Cr Van de Vreede said that for many residents it was not practical to ride the whole way to work and that it was especially difficult for those who worked in the city.
He said all the ban would do was force riders back into their cars and would again increase traffic congestion.
This ban really seems at odds with the Governments support for increased use of public transport, Cr Van de Vreede said.
Its little more than a Band-Aid solution to peak hour overcrowding.
Cr Van de Vreede said the Government should be encouraging people to combine cycling with public transport, not banning them.
He said the ban highlighted Melbournes need for a more integrated public transport system.
Perhaps the State Government needs to look at a public transport system that accommodates everybody, Cr Van de Vreede said.
Public transport is the key to a more sustainable future and its needs to be made accessible to people with and without bikes.
The Mail attempted to contact the Minister for Public Transport Lynne Kosky but was unable to get a response before going to print.
Let us know how we can improve Railpage
Can't find the login form? Hover your mouse over the green Railpage button in the top-left of the website.