| home |
|
| news |
|
| discussions |
|
| content |
|
| site |
|
|
| technical support | Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!
Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.donation  Please Donate!photo comp Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?
Click Here!
Voting Closes 31/12search |
| |
| Author |
Message |
3foot6
Minister for Railways
Joined: Dec 22, 2004 Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008 Location: Brisbane, QLD
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 9:58 pm
|
I have read that Australian Railroad Group will take over the North-West Corridor from August 1, 2008.
It will include:
- The Business Contracts;
- Train Crew Depots at Charters Towers, Hughenden, Cloncurry and Mt Isa;
- Station and Yards at Hughenden, Cloncurry and Mt Isa (not Charters Towers);
- Container Terminals at Cloncurry and Mt Isa;
|
|
 |
bundyfowler
Junior Train Controller
Joined: Jan 25, 2008 Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008 Location: Cloncurry
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:29 pm
|
You have read correct.
Although none of us working out here know fully how it is going to be worked. Many of the station staff and track workers are unsure of their futures.
Lance has kept on assuring us that our 'conditions of employment' and entitlements will not change but we will just have to wait and see???
The northwest corridor is just the starting point for ARG involvement within QR.
|
|
 |
Bamang
Station Master
Joined: Jul 07, 2007 Last Visited: Jul 26, 2008 Location: Brisbane
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:08 am
|
|
it's not just the north west. ARG are looking at all the regional freight areas in Qld.
|
|
 |
RTT_Rules
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Jun 23, 2004 Last Visited: Nov 30, 2008 Location: Gladstone Qld
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:20 am
|
| Bamang wrote: | | it's not just the north west. ARG are looking at all the regional freight areas in Qld. |
I don't get it, whats the point? QR employees, ARG or QRN both are QR employees? or is this privatisation by stealth? Transfer all staff to a private operation owned by QR, does this mean they are not under the QR govt employee conditions etc?
I'm thinking this is a Qantas to Qantas Link type arrangement where the working conditions are more flexible, multi-skilled and less unionised.
Regards
Shane
|
|
 |
Bamang
Station Master
Joined: Jul 07, 2007 Last Visited: Jul 26, 2008 Location: Brisbane
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:51 am
|
|
Sounds about right to me!!
|
|
 |
EMBaldwin
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Feb 26, 2003 Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008 Location: QR Newlands Corridor
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:57 am
|
| RTT_Rules wrote: | | I don't get it, whats the point? QR employees, ARG or QRN both are QR employees? or is this privatisation by stealth? Transfer all staff to a private operation owned by QR, does this mean they are not under the QR govt employee conditions etc? |
By transferring employees to ARG, they are then under the ARG National Agreement.. therefore, different conditions - what those conditions are, and they how they differ, I don't know. The differences between ARG conditions and QR conditions might not be too different before too long anyway, as all QR agreements are currently up for renewal.
Not so sure about "all" regional freight areas - but more those areas that currently work ARG trains.. eg - the raw sugar trains. Mackay might be interesting, as they carry regional freight/intermodal, export coal & sugar!
According to the RTBU, non Bulk (ARG) trains on the GNR (regional freight, PSG, cattle train) will be worked on a hook'n'pull basis - although regional freight might be carried on slots on the Bulk trains.
Steve
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
You want Cane Trains?
You need canetrains.net
|
|
 |
QR-INTERAIL
Assistant Commissioner
Joined: 0 Last Visited: Nov 30, 2008 Location: Where else, but Queensland
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:11 am
|
Would it be a fair assumption that in the future, the $hitty ARG West livery will be applied to locos in the Divisions being taken over?
Regardless, still think they [QR, QRN, Interail, ARG] should have settled on one unified corporate livery.
|
|
 |
siding
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Apr 13, 2004 Last Visited: Nov 30, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:20 am
|
| RTT_Rules wrote: |
I'm thinking this is a Qantas to Qantas Link type arrangement where the working conditions are more flexible, multi-skilled and less unionised.
|
I think more like Jetstar instead of Qantas Link.
|
|
 |
rwj_95
Train Controller
Joined: Jan 12, 2008 Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008 Location: At the computer
contact
|
post
|
|
|
 |
richard6006
Station Master
Joined: Feb 13, 2007 Last Visited: Aug 3, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:12 pm
|
|
What does this mean for rolling stock? Will there be less flexibility? If dedicated rolling stock, how far would they have to go for a major overhaul?
richard
|
|
 |
3foot6
Minister for Railways
Joined: Dec 22, 2004 Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008 Location: Brisbane, QLD
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:45 pm
|
| QR-INTERAIL wrote: | | Would it be a fair assumption that in the future, the $hitty ARG West livery will be applied to locos in the Divisions being taken over? |
I hope not!
Many of the 2800s have just been re-painted in QRNational. Wouldn't it be a huge waste of resources to do such a thing?
|
|
 |
appleby
Junior Train Controller
Joined: Nov 14, 2006 Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008 Location: Out on the patio, this is Oxley, Brisbane
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 6:27 pm
|
|
Sounds like a very dangerous situation.
|
|
 |
Commuter1
Station Master
Joined: Feb 10, 2007 Last Visited: Sep 8, 2008 Location: On a train somewhere
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 6:32 pm
|
| 3foot6 wrote: | I have read that Australian Railroad Group will take over the North-West Corridor from August 1, 2008.
It will include:
- The Business Contracts;
- Train Crew Depots at Charters Towers, Hughenden, Cloncurry and Mt Isa;
- Station and Yards at Hughenden, Cloncurry and Mt Isa (not Charters Towers);
- Container Terminals at Cloncurry and Mt Isa; |
While checking for another post, I noted that ARG is not listed as an accredited railway operator on the QT web site so how can they take over anything.
|
|
 |
CaseyJones
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Nov 12, 2004 Last Visited: Nov 30, 2008 Location: A little south of sanity
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 6:43 pm
|
| EMBaldwin wrote: | | RTT_Rules wrote: | | I don't get it, whats the point? QR employees, ARG or QRN both are QR employees? or is this privatisation by stealth? Transfer all staff to a private operation owned by QR, does this mean they are not under the QR govt employee conditions etc? |
By transferring employees to ARG, they are then under the ARG National Agreement.. therefore, different conditions - what those conditions are, and they how they differ, I don't know. The differences between ARG conditions and QR conditions might not be too different before too long anyway, as all QR agreements are currently up for renewal.
|
They won't be on a national agreement, rather the Eastern agreement, along with all of ARG's NSW employees.
The current AER agreement is a very good agreement. It has great rates of pay, and good conditions to work to.
How it compares to QR, I don't know. However, it is one of the best (if not the best) agreements in use in NSW/Oz at the moment.
QR employees might not think so though, they probably won't be too happy to change
Cheers
GLRPS Member
Comments made are that of my own, and do not reflect those of organisations I am associated with or have mentioned here
At the end of the day...dude, who gives a smeg? Yes or no?!
Vale ARG NSW - the end of a golden (or orange) era - November 22, 2008
|
|
 |
loco2301
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Feb 04, 2006 Last Visited: Nov 17, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:14 pm
|
I was informed by a reliable source at work that when QR employees transfer over to ARG, they will no longer be eligible to be in Q Super.
I was also told that the ARG agreement is far superior to the present QR aggreements, in both pay and conditions, but the big question is, for how long?
It is just the next step in the inevitable privatisation of the freight QR division, if you ask me.
|
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
|
You cannot post new threads in this forum You cannot reply to threads in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group
Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
|
|