| Author |
Message |
GM8101
Junior Train Controller
Joined: Sep 30, 2005
Last Visited: Oct 10, 2008
Location: somewhere in the cab off an 81.
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:07 am
|
|
Heard on the grape vine that ARG has lost the Manildra contract back to PN, has anyone on here heard of this, as I was only told of this development yesterday.
|
|
 |
royscreen
Station Master
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Last Visited: Oct 12, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:33 am
|
G`day,
Yes it is true,end of November i am told.
Cheers "Roy"
|
|
|
Wallip
Deputy Commissioner
Joined: Jun 27, 2004
Last Visited: Oct 11, 2008
Location: Perth
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:35 am
|
I didnt think PN were interested in this sort of work any more. Just as well Manildra own their own wagons, or we could see more sent to the scrappers in 6 months time when PN decide to "Pull Out" of that service as well 
|
|
|
FieldShunt74
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Last Visited: Oct 12, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:02 am
|
| Wallip wrote: | | I didnt think PN were interested in this sort of work any more. |
Don't confuse the Manildra contract with export wheat. The Manildra stuff is regular, steady work which has gone on continuously, drought or no. Export is more seasonal (although it would take a long time to move a big harvest) and much more variable with the season's crop size. PacNat took back the local haulage of wheat into the mills at Gunnedah and Manildra when ARG upset the locals at the latter location. So I don't think PacNat are shy of hauling grain, they were just bunging it on to get concessions for the export side. Regular stuff like Manildra, they'd be keen, I'd say.
Does anyone have any further news on Manildra and ARG and any possible third parties who may or may not be called PacNat?
|
|
|
Fireman Dave
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Last Visited: Oct 11, 2008
Location: Probably Filthy McFaddens
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:58 pm
|
| FieldShunt74 wrote: | | Wallip wrote: | | I didnt think PN were interested in this sort of work any more. |
Don't confuse the Manildra contract with export wheat. The Manildra stuff is regular, steady work which has gone on continuously, drought or no. Export is more seasonal (although it would take a long time to move a big harvest) and much more variable with the season's crop size. PacNat took back the local haulage of wheat into the mills at Gunnedah and Manildra when ARG upset the locals at the latter location. So I don't think PacNat are shy of hauling grain, they were just bunging it on to get concessions for the export side. Regular stuff like Manildra, they'd be keen, I'd say.
Does anyone have any further news on Manildra and ARG and any possible third parties who may or may not be called PacNat? |
PN were never not interested in grain as such, just the short term contracts that came with it (quite understandably if you ask me).
Dave Malcolm
DRIVER, PN CMD
|
|
|
nutbagg
Assistant Commissioner
Joined: Feb 11, 2007
Last Visited: Oct 12, 2008
Location: In Willy Wonka's Chocolate Lake
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:43 pm
|
| Fireman Dave wrote: | | FieldShunt74 wrote: | | Wallip wrote: | | I didnt think PN were interested in this sort of work any more. |
Don't confuse the Manildra contract with export wheat. The Manildra stuff is regular, steady work which has gone on continuously, drought or no. Export is more seasonal (although it would take a long time to move a big harvest) and much more variable with the season's crop size. PacNat took back the local haulage of wheat into the mills at Gunnedah and Manildra when ARG upset the locals at the latter location. So I don't think PacNat are shy of hauling grain, they were just bunging it on to get concessions for the export side. Regular stuff like Manildra, they'd be keen, I'd say.
Does anyone have any further news on Manildra and ARG and any possible third parties who may or may not be called PacNat? |
PN were never not interested in grain as such, just the short term contracts that came with it (quite understandably if you ask me). |
Agreed with the money they'd be making hauling grain in from SA for Manildra, they will stay interested until it goes back to being all local supply then we will see how friendly they are with Manildra!
Mate, if that loco pulls as hard as you do, it'd move anything.
I'd still rather have an ALCo.
|
|
|
hurstville1
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Last Visited: Oct 12, 2008
Location: Where Belfordrocks isn't(aka:not Hurstville)
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 6:37 pm
|
|
Is this contract to [b] Pacific National [b/] or one of it's other corporations ie; Patricks
|
|
|
Sydney_Gunzel
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Jun 03, 2008
Last Visited: Oct 12, 2008
Location: Sydney
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:12 pm
|
| hurstville1 wrote: | | Is this contract to [b] Pacific National [b/] or one of it's other corporations ie; Patricks |
Vince, Raichase has explained it in his blog here. Basically, the contract is going to Asciano, who currently own both Patricks and PN. Word is that the Patricks division will handle the Manildra contract.
|
|
|
Q4004
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Last Visited: Oct 12, 2008
Location: Chasing Q4008 and S3309!!!!!
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 3:34 pm
|
will this mean some 3100's and 2200's could be sent to WA
Better Music. 973 Coast Fm.
When Will DA1578 go in the dirt and be written off
Please PM me if you see the following things
1.Q4008 around Forrestfield and S3309 around Kwinana URGENTLEY AS I NEED THEM 2 COMPLETE COLLECTION
2.WHEN A L CLASS WILL DO THE 430/029 SULPHUR TRAIN
Click to see my old train pics
Click to see my new train pics |
|
|
long end
Station Master
Joined: Apr 29, 2006
Last Visited: Sep 13, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:32 am
|
grain division picked up the contract .patricks division may play apart in the movement from enfield to botany and cooks river,time will tell
cheers all
|
|
|
Sydney_Gunzel
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Jun 03, 2008
Last Visited: Oct 12, 2008
Location: Sydney
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:58 pm
|
| Q4004 wrote: | | will this mean some 3100's and 2200's could be sent to WA |
If you actually read the link I posted, you would know:
| Trents blog wrote: | | The word is that ARG are looking for new contracts to haul |
| long end wrote: | grain division picked up the contract .patricks division may play apart in the movement from enfield to botany and cooks river,time will tell
cheers all |
Sounds interesting, although FC/PN 81+48 combo's are gonna be very boring.
|
|
|
SMR30
Minister for Railways
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Last Visited: Oct 10, 2008
Location: Not close enough to the Main Northern Line where i live :(
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 11:35 pm
|
| Quote: | | Sounds interesting, although FC/PN 81+48 combo's are gonna be very boring. |
Yeah as if we don't see enough 81 class workings 
Though would be nice if some of the overhauled 80's could get used on this. 80/48 class combos would be nice won't be half as borning as with an 81. Don't worry I like 81's but hate it when they take over duties of more interesting locos shuch as 80's (like when they do Ardglen banking,) and with this contract to PN doing former 422, L and CLP/F class duites, though I do like seing them working the Hunter coalies though.
It is a shame that the 422's won't be a sight anymore, my favourite GM locomotives now to go 
|
|
|
rumbleman
Junior Train Controller
Joined: Nov 06, 2007
Last Visited: Oct 11, 2008
Location: Newcastle, NSW
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:09 am
|
You ever worked an 81 compared to something you put as being "more interesting"? I think not.
Pacific National is a business with money to be earnt and peoples wages to be paid, and they do a pretty decent job at it. Try ripping the 81's off the lead engine of a consist for an 80 and most crews plus the RTBU will rip ya to f*ckin shreads.
Before you go shooting your mouth off about "as if we don't see enough 81's" maybe you should consider my above points. We don't run trains to satisfy your gunzelling needs, we run trains with particular locomotives to get coal/wheat/freight from A to B. Be it whatever motive power PN has available at the time, the resource co-ordinators don't take into account the gunzels. Nor shoud they.
We must always remember the past, but never live in it
|
|
|
Fireman Dave
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Last Visited: Oct 11, 2008
Location: Probably Filthy McFaddens
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:09 am
|
| rumbleman wrote: | | You ever worked an 81 compared to something you put as being "more interesting"? I think not. |
Just out of curiosity, how many 81s have YOU worked? There's plenty of blokes would work just about anything over an 81.
How long have you been employed as a TO, a week? Are you even qualified yet?
Dave Malcolm
DRIVER, PN CMD
|
|
|
yoyoman
Station Master
Joined: Jan 15, 2007
Last Visited: Oct 11, 2008
Location: Adelaide, SA
contact
|
post
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:30 pm
|
| rumbleman wrote: | Try ripping the 81's off the lead engine of a consist for an 80 and most crews plus the RTBU will rip ya to f*ckin shreads.
|
At least an 80 doesn't leak as much water through the windscreen's like the 81's. When I was working in NSW, I was surprised that the crews put up with the water leaking into the cabin and were not banned from leading in wet weather. It's not a new problem from what I was told.
|
|
|
|
|
