Railpage Australia™
  
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/12
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

Policy on late running trains.

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Sydney Suburban
Page 1 of 3   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

Author Message
vendettachild Station Master   Joined: Feb 12, 2007
Last Visited: Sep 20, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:16 am
This morning wet weather affected services along Western and North Shore lines. I caught the city bound train from Mt Druitt 10:17 and the train services seemed normal enough. Then an announcement comes along, saying the train won't stop at Westmead, Parramatta and Harris Park. Mind you the train was already 10 minutes late. I thought that was OK, I will get to Redfern sooner. Arrive at Lidcombe, another announcement train will not stop at Redfern. Changed trains at Strathfield, got on the next train. A few minutes later, man announces that the train also won't stop at Redern! Despite all the indicator boards saying so.

I've been on late trains during my time, and they always stop at their designated stops. Not stopping at Westmead, Parramatta, Harris Park and Redfern, now that is out of this world!

Anyways my question is can Cityrail do this? Can they decide on what stations to sail through when the train is late? What can/can't they do regarding late trains?
 
s
42101 Banned   Joined: Oct 12, 2005
Last Visited: Sep 27, 2008
Location: Banned


contact

post
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:20 am
They run the system they can do whatever they like to get services back close to normal running which means transposing trains to get them into place for their next run so as not to hold up yet more customers on other services and lines.



Banned
 
s
Tsubame800 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Apr 13, 2005
Last Visited: Nov 16, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 1:01 am
Greg wasn't another reason (though i think this was false) that they do station skipping in order to make sure that the crews don't go over the shifts or something like that?



In Life there are problems and Migraine's a problem is solvable.. a Migraine is a Woman.
 
s
TheLoadedDog El Sombrero!   Joined: Jun 19, 2003
Last Visited: Sep 28, 2008
Location: Macquarie Fields NSW


contact

post
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 1:20 am
Many of you may possibly remember my infamously long thread of 2004 that was a big anti-Cityrail screed. For those who don't, 2004 was a low point in Cityrail ontime running, and it got to the point that I was leaving home at 11:30 in Liverpool to arrive on time at work in Alexandria at 14:00. Yes, five hours travelling per day within the metro area (and it wasn't like I was doing Emu Plains - Cronulla either!). This was to allow for at least one (possibly two) cancelled trains, and another very late one.

The crunch point (that made me write to ministers, premiers, etc) came the day my Livo-City via Bankstown train was diverted without warning via Strathfield. I ended up about three hours worth of travelling time home to home and without having gone to work - I had to call in sick, because I would have been so late.

So I rang up and complained.

The official response was that the train was diverted so it could arrive at Central on time (it was already very late). I asked the Railcorp drone on the phone, "So what about the people travelling to intermediate stations, where the train didn't just arrive late, but it didn't arrive AT ALL?"

He had no answer, but he also won, because I gave up my fight. It was pointless.

Cityrail will sacrifice its intermediate customers so long as end to end running is upheld.



Humphrey! We're leaving!
 
s
Bwana Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jul 21, 2003
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:03 am
This goes back to the same flawed idea that NSWGR have had from day 1 - that everyone wants to go to the city, and screw anyone who doesn't. This comes out pretty much anywhere it could:

- How many cross-city lines are there, or cross-city trains? Back in the 80's there was one train a week, and then only over summer, from Penrith to Cronulla. In the 90's they played with Sydenham-Bankstown-Regent's Park-Lidcombe loop-Parra-Blacktown. There were about 4 peak hour trains. Next timetable they were gone. Then they spent literally millions on a Merrylands-Harris Park link - which now gets 2 trains a day each way.
- Even within a line, poor connections for intermediate stations. Wanna get a train from Unanderra to Fairy Meadow? Fine. Sit at Wollongong Station for 50 minutes waiting for your connection. Fairy Meadow - Sydney? Of course sir, 4 minute change at Thirroul for you.
- Poor connections at interchanges. Coming from Carlingford, 3 minute wait for a city train. 27 minute wait for a train to Granville, during which time at least one train will go past that stops all stations from Lidcombe to it's destination APART from Clyde. Same is true at Sydenham, Wolli Creek or Granville (although those people should really have waited for their twice-daily cumberland line train anyway Rolling Eyes )
- Ticketing - Want a travelpass for your trip from, say, Taren Point to Sutherland (7.2km)? You'll need a pink travelpass, $50 a week thanks. Taren Point - City (24.3km - ie 3.5 times the distance)? A green pass for you, $43 thanks.

To me this is the second biggest failure of Railcorp, behind the "Oh, your train is of fire or submerged? Train crew don't realise or are incapacitated? Well you're screwed then, because if we let you save your own life you'll be too stupid to avoid being hit by another train" Policy.



I am SO moving to Victoria Street!!

Check out my pics at http://bwana.fotopic.net
 
s
Maikha Not a gunzel <s>Not</s> a gunzel
  Joined: Sep 06, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 22, 2008
Location: Wagga Wagga, NSW


contact

post
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:41 am
TheLoadedDog™™ wrote:
Many of you may possibly remember my infamously long thread of 2004 that was a big anti-Cityrail screed. For those who don't, 2004 was a low point in Cityrail ontime running....
If I'm correct also, I read there was a class action against Cityrail for many 'inconveniences' that were created for select few commuters over that period.

I'm curious to know if they were successful in their action or is Cityrail protected by any Government clauses?



Cheers
Maikha Ly

The Intercity Platform & Valve Gear Media!
http://www.theintercityplatform.com/

Comments made are that of my own, and do not reflect those of organisations mentioned.
 
s
Gareth Beginner   Joined: Jul 17, 2007
Last Visited: Nov 29, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:26 pm
I was on a Bankstown line train once that was delayed at Central due to a signal failure or some such. It was decided to stop only at Sydenham and Bankstown, then all stations to the destination (iirc Lidcombe). So the run was useless to most people on the line and was basically just a positioning run for the next service.
 
s
tsgsjm Junior Train Controller   Joined: Feb 26, 2007
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008
Location: Sydney


contact

post
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:31 pm
Gareth wrote:
I was on a Bankstown line train once that was delayed at Central due to a signal failure or some such. It was decided to stop only at Sydenham and Bankstown, then all stations to the destination (iirc Lidcombe). So the run was useless to most people on the line and was basically just a positioning run for the next service.


So do they leave it late for numerous runs and inconvenience lots more people, or tranpose it for 1 run to get it back on time, and inconvenience a smaller number of people. They are damned if they do and damned if they dont.
 
s
1979 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jul 17, 2006
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008
Location: Your Not Getting It That Easy


contact

post
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 10:40 pm
A few weeks ago there was a door problem with the train from Kiama so it had to stop at Heathcote for about 20 mins in the arvo peak. So to get the trains back on time. They transposed a train from Waterfall to go All to Hurstville then Redfern.

I have been on a few transpodes trains and thats the only way that there going to get there on time. So some people do have to wait.



Do Do Do Attention Passengers, the 9:17 Empty Train via the Eastern Subburbs and Illawarra line will now depart from platform 4. Please make your way to platform 4.
 
s
borosa Chief Train Controller   Joined: Jan 11, 2007
Last Visited: Nov 20, 2008
Location: Sydney


contact

post
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:42 pm
Reminds me of the saying... "Couldn't organise a P1ssup in a brewery!"
 
s
dirge Chief Train Controller   Joined: May 20, 2004
Last Visited: Oct 14, 2008
Location: All to Royal National Park


contact

post
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:31 am
I think TLD™ has nailed the real problem with this policy. It's not so much whether or not Cityrail/Railcorp switch things around, rather how they treat their customers when doing so.

Poor communication such as not informing passengers and therefore not giving them time to alight and readjust their travel, is always going to make transposition a BAD move, from a PR point of view.

I'm on this forum because I'm a commuter, not a gunzel. I've been on transposed trains, and I've been on delayed trains. I don't mind so long as I can see that those making the decisions are trying to ensure that I'm put out as little as possible. If I have to get off and change, I'm okay with that. If my station is skipped without warning, I'm NOT okay with that.
 
s
ozibob Assistant Commissioner   Joined: Jan 12, 2004
Last Visited: Nov 29, 2008
Location: Sydney Australia


contact

post
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:37 pm
How else do they get their on time running so high, and the bosses bonuses for on time running. All timings thru central.



If a word is misspelled in the dictionary, how would we ever know?


Soy-renitycandles- For all your 100%
natural candle needs.



Scott
Cityrail Driver.
Ex Frieght Driver
 
s
tbohlsennswssrg Train Controller   Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008
Location: Roseville, Sydney, NSW


contact

post
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:28 pm
Remember on time running figures are based from sydney central and are the following delays:

Metro Area: +- 5 minutes
I't'c'ty Area: +- 6 minutes

I't'c'ty = Intercity



Timothy Bohlsen (NSWSSMRC/NSWSSRG Treasurer)
Apple Developer Connection Member and iPhone (ADC)
My Websites: http://web.mac.com/timothy_bohlsen/TMB_Web/Websites.html

Visit my forum (link on page above)
 
s
zordmaker Junior Train Controller   Joined: Mar 25, 2007
Last Visited: Nov 22, 2008
Location: NSW


contact

post
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:20 pm
All I can say is that in the early '90s at Traffic trouble this would have been an absolute hanging offence. Stop trains short of their destinations and turn them back - yes. Cancel services altogether - yes. But NEVER, EVER skip advertised stops. EVER Not EVER EVER, no matter how disorganised the service became. In times of extreme dissaray the opposite became true. As some trains failed or were cancelled, other expresses then became all stops.

I would never have believed it was happening until I saw it for myself first hand in 2005 on a random trip home from the city. And there wasn't even an incident. Not even so much as a "trains are running late and out of timetabel order" declaration. Jyst a train full of passengers who suddenly found themselves tens of kilometers further from their destinations than they planned without any warning whatsoever despite these being advertised stops on previous platforms.

And, as I say (for me) was "the day the music truly died". I don't trust Cityrail anymore since, for anything, ever. I now only use it for gunzelling, never for getting me somewhere i wnat to or have to be.

zordmaker


vendettachild wrote:
This morning wet weather affected services along Western and North Shore lines. I caught the city bound train from Mt Druitt 10:17 and the train services seemed normal enough. Then an announcement comes along, saying the train won't stop at Westmead, Parramatta and Harris Park. Mind you the train was already 10 minutes late. I thought that was OK, I will get to Redfern sooner. Arrive at Lidcombe, another announcement train will not stop at Redfern. Changed trains at Strathfield, got on the next train. A few minutes later, man announces that the train also won't stop at Redern! Despite all the indicator boards saying so.

I've been on late trains during my time, and they always stop at their designated stops. Not stopping at Westmead, Parramatta, Harris Park and Redfern, now that is out of this world!

Anyways my question is can Cityrail do this? Can they decide on what stations to sail through when the train is late? What can/can't they do regarding late trains?
 
s
Maikha Not a gunzel <s>Not</s> a gunzel
  Joined: Sep 06, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 22, 2008
Location: Wagga Wagga, NSW


contact

post
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:41 pm
borosa wrote:
Reminds me of the saying... "Couldn't organise a P1ssup in a brewery!"
Or a "Root in a...." Twisted Evil



Cheers
Maikha Ly

The Intercity Platform & Valve Gear Media!
http://www.theintercityplatform.com/

Comments made are that of my own, and do not reflect those of organisations mentioned.
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> Sydney Suburban
Page 1 of 3  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You can post new threads in this forum
You can reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©



Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2008 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.547 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.11%