| home |
|
| news |
|
| discussions |
|
| content |
|
| site |
|
|
| technical support | Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!
Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.donation  Please Donate!photo comp Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?
Click Here!
Voting Closes 30/11search |
| |
| Author |
Message |
nonscenic
Station Master
Joined: May 26, 2005 Last Visited: Nov 9, 2008 Location: Southern Cross by day
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:51 pm
|
The number of times that on train PIDs get "geographically challenged" on Melbourne's system, especially around the city loop lead me to think that they detected position on a gps system. Frequently the next station is Parliament all the way to Southern Cross, and at times I have seen Officer and Jacana as the next station while in the loop. Sometimes the driver recognises the problem (or it resets itself) and it changes to the ironic message "Welcome to Connex"
On train PIDs can work in underground systems as I found while recently travelling the Tokyo subway lines. Over many trips, mostly underground, the PIDs and voice announcments in Japanese and English worked flawlessly (and also advised ahead of each station what interchanges were available )
Such systems can work reliably - is there a technical reason why the PIDs on Melbourne's trains don't?
SPAD: Signals Passed at Danger relieve the boredom
|
|
 |
Knowitall
Banned
Joined: Mar 25, 2007 Last Visited: Nov 14, 2008 Location: Banned
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:01 pm
|
|
because they did not want to spend the money on a good system
Banned
|
|
 |
alstom_888m
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Aug 26, 2007 Last Visited: Nov 23, 2008 Location: Craigieburn Suburban Railway Line, Melbourne
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:08 pm
|
Ours are GPS. And that deep underground GPS doesn't work 100%.
I believe London Underground trains of the 1992, 1995 and 1996 stock design of the Central, Northern, and Jubilee lines respectively, use magnets on the track for PID's but I'm not 100% sure.
Reliable, Economical, Safe, By Rail.
|
|
 |
Heihachi_73
Deputy Commissioner
Joined: Jan 20, 2004 Last Visited: Nov 20, 2008 Location: Ringwood Stopping all stations except East Richmond
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:57 pm
|
The Concorde project was to reconcile two identical, but modified train types, however using an inferior system. The system itself can be upgraded but there is apparently no need to, apart from changing Spencer Street to Southern Cross. On Connex North lines the re-spoken words sound so different to the original voice as heard on X'Trapolis trains. Some recorded stations such as on the Craigieburn line just don't match the pitch of the next station (now arriving at) or change here voice. I personally have no idea why they had to re-record the Connex North lines either when they did that.
There were only two or three stations that were better on the new system than the older X'Trapolis style, Mont Albert (as opposed to Mon Talbot), Auburn (Awwwburn), Heyington (HEYington) and Southern Cross (sounds like it's a question on X'Traps).
The most reliable PID system they had was the very first one, but it was only programmed to announce premium stations. When crash victim 634M or 698M went back into service a few years ago it still had this version on it, complete with the 10 point plan and original Connex maps (with a Bayside logo on the other lines) inside it. I only got to travel on the set once before it was upgraded.
As I mentioned on the other thread, jump on the 0608 Lilydale express from Flinders Street for some Unknown LineIDs and no 'change here' announcements! Unless it was just the one set, then 661M will have to lead a train. Bad luck if it's an X'Trapolis for the day, you'll have to try another time!
You cannot run from your own bunghole.
|
|
 |
Z181
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Apr 27, 2006 Last Visited: Nov 19, 2008 Location: ARRIVING Watsonia
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:57 am
|
|
Dont forget with the X'Traps - istead of saying Ivanhoe, the ALSTOM lady admits this statement - Imahoe
LIMITED EXPRESS TO Greensborough VIA CITY LOOP
|
|
 |
Speed
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Mar 19, 2007 Last Visited: Nov 23, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 9:47 am
|
|
There's a joke at Melbtrip's expense to be made of Z181's post. I just don't know what it is yet.
|
|
 |
alstom_888m
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Aug 26, 2007 Last Visited: Nov 23, 2008 Location: Craigieburn Suburban Railway Line, Melbourne
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:57 am
|
Now I think of it, before the Concorde project, I never saw an issue with the PID's. I first saw a malfunction on the very first day on Alstom on Northern revenue running, and every ride on a Comeng I've had since, the PID's have malfunctioned in some capacity.
I've had a funny incident on a Craigieburn Alstom that was "Now Arriving at", after the train had stopped at Newmarket. To make it a more happier journey, the train was silent after that.
One hopes the PID actually packed it in.
Reliable, Economical, Safe, By Rail.
|
|
 |
wongm
Minister for Railways
Joined: May 26, 2005 Last Visited: Nov 21, 2008 Location: Geelong, Victoria
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:38 pm
|
| alstom_888m wrote: | | Ours are GPS. And that deep underground GPS doesn't work 100%. |
I recall reading the the Alstom fitted PIDs (XTrap and original Alstom Comengs) used distance measuring sensors, so after a loss of GPS signal they could work out roughly where they were. I have a hazy recollection that the Concorde project got rid of this from the Alstom Comengs.
However, as long as the train knows where it is to start with and has the correct train number input it should stay correct.
Speaking of reliability, there are a lot of services run in Melbourne, and most of us here have can point to a number of times seeing it stuff up. When travelling overseas you catch a lot less trains - so either they are as bad as ours but you didn't see a failure, or they are actually better than ours.
|
|
 |
Camster
Deputy Commissioner
Joined: Nov 25, 2004 Last Visited: Nov 17, 2008 Location: Kew by force
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:00 pm
|
| wongm wrote: | | alstom_888m wrote: | | Ours are GPS. And that deep underground GPS doesn't work 100%. |
I recall reading the the Alstom fitted PIDs (XTrap and original Alstom Comengs) used distance measuring sensors, so after a loss of GPS signal they could work out roughly where they were. I have a hazy recollection that the Concorde project got rid of this from the Alstom Comengs.
However, as long as the train knows where it is to start with and has the correct train number input it should stay correct.
Speaking of reliability, there are a lot of services run in Melbourne, and most of us here have can point to a number of times seeing it stuff up. When travelling overseas you catch a lot less trains - so either they are as bad as ours but you didn't see a failure, or they are actually better than ours. |
Not sure but when I've gone to Brisbane I only ever use PT. I know Brisbane only has manual announcements, but their system is very good, I don't ever rememeber getting lost of their system.
"Election in November"
"What? Again? This stupid country!"
|
|
 |
Nexas
The Ghost of George Stephenson
Joined: Jan 12, 2003 Last Visited: Nov 5, 2008
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:34 pm
|
| Heihachi_73 wrote: |
There were only two or three stations that were better on the new system than the older X'Trapolis style, Mont Albert (as opposed to Mon Talbot), Auburn (Awwwburn), Heyington (HEYington) and Southern Cross (sounds like it's a question on X'Traps).
|
There is no actual difference in sound recordings between the two "systems". The exact same sound database is used. The only difference is in the programming.
For some reason the Comengs are programmed to say the station name in the "middle of sentence" inflection, rather than "end of sentence" inflection. This isn't a hard and fast rule however, some do use the opposite one, wherever there has been an issue with one or the other, for example "CRAIGIEBURN!!!!!!!" and "Southern CROSS!" to name a couple of the few examples.
Views expressed by me are strictly my own, not of my friends, employer, or anyone else, unless otherwise stated.
*Back at RP for a limited time only*
|
|
 |
Haydenthegunzel
Deputy Commissioner
Joined: Jul 21, 2007 Last Visited: Nov 21, 2008 Location: X'Trap goin' to Craigieburn!
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:27 pm
|
I had a few Comengs that had strange habits with PIDS.
Mainly on the return run to Broady.....
Leaving FSS: t CONNEX!!!!!!!!!! This is a service to CRAIGIEBURN!!!!!!!!!! stopping all stations via the city loop.
Nearly all announcements started with RIVING AT...... or ARRIVING AT......
One Comeng on the way to the city missed strathmore and glenbervie. Just saying NOW ARRIVING AT..................
The return EDI Comeng that day had no announcements. Screens stuck on WELCOME TO CONNEX.
Also noted that at North Melbourne she says. RIVING at North Melbourne. Change here for Werribee........WillimastownSydenham....andUpfield services. I had no idea there was such a suburb as WilliamstownSydenham!!!!!!
|
|
 |
nonscenic
Station Master
Joined: May 26, 2005 Last Visited: Nov 9, 2008 Location: Southern Cross by day
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:53 pm
|
| alstom_888m wrote: | Ours are GPS. And that deep underground GPS doesn't work 100%.
I believe London Underground trains of the 1992, 1995 and 1996 stock design of the Central, Northern, and Jubilee lines respectively, use magnets on the track for PID's but I'm not 100% sure. |
Thanks for the feedback. One wonders why we'd choose a system that relies solely on gps when we have underground sections - probably it was cheaper than installing magnetic sensors or encoding track circuitry.
Its a good thing we don't try and use the Docklands Light Railways moving block safeworking and driverless control!
SPAD: Signals Passed at Danger relieve the boredom
|
|
 |
alstom_888m
Chief Commissioner
Joined: Aug 26, 2007 Last Visited: Nov 23, 2008 Location: Craigieburn Suburban Railway Line, Melbourne
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:27 pm
|
| Haydenthegunzel wrote: | | One Comeng on the way to the city missed strathmore and glenbervie. Just saying NOW ARRIVING AT................. |
623M constantly does that at Newmarket. Got it 5 days in a row on my way home.
Reliable, Economical, Safe, By Rail.
|
|
 |
xtrap_heaven
Chief Train Controller
Joined: Aug 19, 2007 Last Visited: Nov 23, 2008 Location: Melbourne's Train Network
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:12 pm
|
Ever Heard Thiss Announcement?
"Now arriving at: Flinders Street, ALL CHANGE! THIS TRAIN - NOT TAKING PASSENGERS! ALL CHANGE! INTERNAL DISPLAY AND AUDIO TEST! <loud siren noise>"
And The Pids say:
All change, this train is not taking passengers INTERNAL DISPLAY AND AUDIO TEST | || |||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
 |
WiRED
Station Master
Joined: Oct 25, 2007 Last Visited: Nov 23, 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia
contact
|
post
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 8:26 pm
|
I was once on a train years ago, and the following happened.
We were in the loop heading for Epping. The stations were back to front, so it said: Epping, Lalor, Thomastown, etc..
Last station in the loop, driver stops for 5 minutes or so and made a P.A announcement. "Sorry for the delay passengers, the train is experiencing technical difficulties.
Cheers,
|
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
|
You cannot post new threads in this forum You cannot reply to threads in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group
Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
|
|