Just had a quick look at the ARTC Safe Notice 2 - 1822 covering the Local Appendix offering for the SSFL.
Page 2: LAU 010 Item (d) for the level crossing at Casula offers two kilometrages 38.045km or 38.838km. Take your pick.
Page 3: LAU 050 the Sefton Dive (a) quotes the kilometrage at 21.707km but in the diagram it looses 100 metres to become 21.607km. Again your choice.
Page 4: LAU 055 Leightonfield's kilometrage is shown as 23.665km but the level crossing No 6 on diagram (a) has its kilometrage shown as 23.530km in LAU 010. This must mean that Leightonfield is south of the level crossing km.
Page 6: LAU 060 Glenfield in (a) diagram the loop is shown as 1870m metres long, but below in (d) it shrinks to 1850metres. Where did the 20 metres go?
In General Arrangements it says "A crossing loop and sidings is(sic) provided at Glenfield. Sidings at Glenfield? Not when I last looked at the diagram.
Then in (f) it mentions "points 217, 218, 220 and 221 and catch points" Na sorry they are back at Leightonfield. Try 222 and 223 points.
Next line mentions Telephones at Leightonfield. Who cares if you are at Glenfield looking for a phone?
Page 7: LAU 065 Campbelltown Service Level crossing. The kilometrage listed at (a) is 55.245km but in the diagram is reads 55.745km. 500 metres difference, so where is the correct KM?
In (c) it mentions Safe Flash and Cerbeurs. Maybe this should read Ceberus?
Well it looks like to me yet another typical ARTC document, no care and no responsibility attitude they are so good at. Then again at least they put something out even if it has heaps of errors in it.