Railpage Australia™
  
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/12
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

XPT From Melbourne 26th of September delayed at Cootumundra

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> New South Wales
Page 1 of 1   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ]

Author Message
XP2009 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 23, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 16, 2006


contact

post
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2003 4:48 pm
The Melbourne XPT got delayed at cootumundra on the 26th of september and caused alot of people to miss the Murwillimbah connection this was PN's fault for not giving the XPT right of way due to trackwork
NOT HAPPY

Spent all day Saturday on a bus chasing the Murwillimbah XPT and the bus was only half an hour behind the train Surely Control could delay it for half an hour 40 min so thier passengers could catch the train

Not Impressed PN next time dont hold up a pass train

Yes we were on the platform as well but couldnt go outside the doors were locked and they wouldnt unlock them

Cheers Joel

PS this was to Sydney
 
s
dudley Junior Train Controller   Joined: Sep 25, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 7, 2008
Location: sydney


contact

post
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2003 10:46 pm
How could it be PN`s fault South control calls the shots at coota
PN would have payed for the path
cancell the XPT =5 BUSES
cancell thr freight =80 TO 100 TRUCKS



I dont ride trains I know the people that drive them !!!!
 
s
Fireman Dave Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: Probably Filthy McFaddens


contact

post
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2003 5:43 pm
dudley wrote:
How could it be PN`s fault South control calls the shots at coota
PN would have payed for the path
cancell the XPT =5 BUSES
cancell thr freight =80 TO 100 TRUCKS


Actually it's the Southern Rail Management Center (Junee Control) South Control only to Goulburn.



Dave Malcolm
DRIVER, PN CMD
 
s
XP2009 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 23, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 16, 2006


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 2:24 pm
Still they should have given the XPT Right of way

I didnt know who was doing it
but i dont want it to happen again

Cheers Joel
 
s
Fireman Dave Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: Probably Filthy McFaddens


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 4:33 pm
6002t wrote:
Still they should have given the XPT Right of way

I didnt know who was doing it
but i dont want it to happen again

Cheers Joel


Why should they have given the XPT the right of way? Pacific National pay for their path just like Countrylink do, and they have customers waiting for their train, and it's freight that keeps the railways open.



Dave Malcolm
DRIVER, PN CMD
 
s
XP2009 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 23, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 16, 2006


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:46 pm
Because i have Lymphademia and cant sit on a bus for 11 hours

Cheers Joel
 
s
ParkesHub Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jul 29, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 30, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:52 pm
Fireman Dave wrote:

Why should they have given the XPT the right of way? Pacific National pay for their path just like Countrylink do, and they have customers waiting for their train, and it's freight that keeps the railways open.


Because there is a hierarchy in place that allows a pass to take precedence over freight. Presumably, but not necessarily, that would be reflected in access fees.

The XPT is a travesty of service even when it runs to time!!!!
 
s
mjja Sir Nigel Gresley   Joined: Jan 13, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 26, 2008
Location: Mount Waverley, Melbourne


contact

post
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 10:51 am
Of course they really need to double-track the lot so they can go wrong road if they need to. That would also speed the services up a whole lot - on waiting in passing loops.

An alternative route would help too - eg if there was still a way to get to Sydney via Tocumwal (assuming everything was SG).



Happy Gunzelling and remember, "Go by rail!"

Michael Angelico
President, Smart Passengers Inc
(My opinions are my own unless specifically stated.)
 
s
Fireman Dave Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: Probably Filthy McFaddens


contact

post
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 4:01 pm
ParkesHub wrote:
Fireman Dave wrote:

Why should they have given the XPT the right of way? Pacific National pay for their path just like Countrylink do, and they have customers waiting for their train, and it's freight that keeps the railways open.


Because there is a hierarchy in place that allows a pass to take precedence over freight. Presumably, but not necessarily, that would be reflected in access fees.


You are assuming the XPT was on it's path. The protocol is that an on time train has precedence over a late train, regardless of the type of train. The Freighter may also have been running late as well, but we don't really know the whole story. Controllers don't always follow the protocol, but there is always a reason.



Dave Malcolm
DRIVER, PN CMD
 
s
XP2009 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 23, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 16, 2006


contact

post
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2003 5:53 pm
XPT was 8 min late on arrival into Cootumundra

Cheers Joel
 
s
Fireman Dave Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: Probably Filthy McFaddens


contact

post
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2003 4:31 pm
6002t wrote:
XPT was 8 min late on arrival into Cootumundra

Cheers Joel


So it was no longer a "healthy" train ( a train on it's path), and as such according to the train control protocol must be held for a "healthy" train.



Dave Malcolm
DRIVER, PN CMD
 
s
awsgc24 Minister for Railways   Joined: Feb 18, 2003
Last Visited: Dec 2, 2008
Location: Sydney, NSW


contact

post
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2003 5:11 pm
mjja wrote:

An alternative route would help too - eg if there was still a way to get to Sydney via Tocumwal (assuming everything was SG).


The track via Tocumwal is too light for heavy freight engines and would need to be replace, also the wooden sleepers. Plus bridges like the one over the Murrumbigee.

Narrandera to Tocumwal is 180km. Assuming no sidings, and using the "average" cost of the Darwin line of $1m per km, that's $180m minimum.

What is the distance from Tocumwal to Seymour on the Victoria side where dual gauge may cause some problems?

The existing 30kg rails do not have a lot of value, except as fence posts. And there is no longer any demand for old rails to recycle as Telegraph posts, since telegraphs are obsolete.


A disadvange of the Tocumwal bypass is that it is an all or nothing project. You need to do most of the work before it returns any value.

Incremental improvement on the existing line is more likely to be of value. For example, put short platforms on the loops where the XPT stops so that freight trains can cross on the main line and avoid the low speed turnouts at either end.



One size fits all?
_ Railway gauge _ _ _ _ : Mostly YES; Almost always 1435mm _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ : except sugar cane trams, rocket launch pads, telescopes.
_ _ Shoe/hat/ ring sizes: NO_ _ _ _ _ .
May use SUW 2000 VGA to bridge break-of-gauge.
 
s
XP2009 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 23, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 16, 2006


contact

post
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2003 10:18 pm
it was healthy thier wasnt anything wrong with it it was late arriving into melbourne as well

Cheers Joel
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> New South Wales
Page 1 of 1  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ]

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You cannot post new threads in this forum
You cannot reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©



Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2008 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.243 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.80%