Railpage Australia™
Diamond Valley Railway  
The premier Australian rail server - wasting time and bandwidth since 1992!
 
home
news
discussions
content
site

technical support
Need Help? Lodge a support ticket!

Note: This is for technical support only. General questions about railways should be posted to the Forums.
donation
Donate using PayPal
Please Donate!
photo comp
Have YOU voted yet on Photo of the Month?

Click Here!

Voting Closes 31/12
search


 
faqsearchusergroups profileLog in

Spelling and punctuation

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> General
Page 2 of 24   [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 22, 23, 24  Next

Author Message
Nexas The Ghost of George Stephenson   Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 26, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 1:21 pm
Theres one user here who frequently spells our country as "AusTralia"...

Now THAT smeg me!



Views expressed by me are strictly my own, not of my friends, employer, or anyone else, unless otherwise stated.
*Back at RP for a limited time only*
 
s
Sonofagunzel Chief Commissioner   Joined: Nov 18 2003
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:00 pm
Nexas wrote:
Theres one user here who frequently spells our country as "AusTralia"...

Now THAT smeg me!


Yeah, it should be austRAILia!

_________________________________________________________
SOAG
A proud ausTRAIN.
 
s
J549 Chief Train Controller   Joined: Jun 18, 2003
Last Visited: Apr 28, 2004
Location: Werribee, Melbourne


contact

post
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:09 pm
About my 60+ comment...that was only for a laugh, also to get a point across which was a joke of a point anyway. I dont think of 60+ people in that sense Smile As for me im not against abreviations or for them. I have alot of ditzy friends who use it in which case i start to use it with them. When im talking to someone who doesnt use it i then use proper english and grammer. Although my spelling isnt always the best Razz If someone who is over 60 could make my dad use a computer i'd be very happy. My father is in his 50 and computer illiterate. If he would take the time to learn soem basic internet and computer skills it would make life so much easier. (i wouldnt have to be his damned secratery Razz )



Andy.
member of VGR/CMR.

M>train...another one bites the dust
 
s
zipitidoodah Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 22, 2003
Last Visited: Apr 28, 2007


contact

post
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 9:03 pm
Disclaimer:
I don't claim to be the God of English, and I don't claim to never make the mistakes I hate myself! Also I realise some people find all of this more difficult or weren't taught properly in the first place.

The things that commonly annoy me, and this is in general everyday use of English: (some of which have already been pointed out):
  • Use of abbreviations or "chat"-style slang which forces the reader to stop to think what is actually being said.
  • Lack of capitalisation and general punctuation, especially when it leads to difficulty in ascertaining exactly where the start and the finish of a sentence is. Conversely, excessive capitalisation is annoying. Basically it's only capitals if it's the start of a sentence, an acronym or a proper noun (eg. a name of a place or a person), NOT if you just feel the word should have capitals.
  • Poor and inaccurate spelling.
  • Use of "your" when it should be "you are" or "you're". To check it, try replacing it with "you are" and see if it still makes sense. If it does, then you should use "you're" and if it doesn't you should use "your".
  • Incorrect usage of "their", "they're" and "there". To check it:
    1. If it makes sense when replaced with "they are" then you can use "they're".
    2. If referring to an object as belonging to someone else, as in "it was their apples" then you should use "their".
    3. If saying "over there" then you should use "there".
I think the most common mistake is when people mean to say something like "they are going to fix the tap tomorrow" and they say "their going to fix the tap tomorrow" instead.
  • Apostrophes and plurals. Apostrophes are used to show either ownership or contractions.
    • Ownership: if the dog belongs to Jack, then it is "Jack's dog". If you need to add an apostrophe and an "s" to a name that already ends in "s", like "Charles", then you can make it "Charles's" or you can say "Charles' ". The only exception is when using the word "it" to say that the "dog" belongs to "it", in which case noapostrophe is used and you just say "its". The only time you use "it's" with the apostrophe is when you could be saying "it is" instead.
    • Contractions: like converting "they are" to "they're" or converting "it is" to "it's".
    Now, if you want to make a word plural, ie. there is more than one of the object, like "dogs" or "cats", then most of us already know you just add an "s" unless it's a word like "sheep". BUT you never use an apostrophe and then an "s" because it's NOT a contraction and it's NOT showing ownership of anything. If you need to show ownership where the owner is a plural, like the toys that all the dogs were playing with, then the rule for showing ownership still applies: you have "dogs" (plural), and the word ends in "s", so you just add an apostrophe, optionally followed by an "s". In this case, you could say "Go and pack up the dogs' toys." If you had said "dog's toys" then you mean there is only one dog, and if you had said "toy's" instead of "toys" then you are just wrong!
  • Use of ie. and eg. ie. equates to "in other words" and eg. means "for example". ie. is often used when eg. should be used instead.
  • Starting a sentence with a number. Sounds stupid, but if you have to start a sentence with a number then it should be written in words, not in figures.
  • American spelling like "color" instead of "colour" and "standardize" instead of "standardise".
  • No paragraphs make a big wad of text hard to read. Ever noticed how newspapers paragraph all the time? That's so you can read it easily. Generally though, the people on the forums who do post lengthy posts paragraph anyway, so it's not much of an issue.
  • Technically incorrect grammar, although this is only because I am quite pedantic!! Very Happy (like when people say "I'll try and do it" when really they mean "I'll try to do it")


Most of all the apostrophes annoy me, like when "All CD's are 20% off". There is no reason to use an apostrophe so it should be "CDs". Similarly, if you were talking about G classes or VQDW wagons (to make it more relevant Smile ) you should not say "I saw lots of G's and VQDW's today" but instead "I saw lots of Gs and VQDWs today". The only problem I have with that is that it's tempting to use an apostrophe in some situations like that, however incorrect, just to ensure people understand what you say.

Like I said at the top, I am pedantic so I take care to ensure anything I write is gramatically correct, but I know a lot of people don't care or don't know, so don't take it personally if you don't write "correctly" according to the above! Razz
 
s
Nexas The Ghost of George Stephenson   Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 26, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 9:22 pm
Another thing that smeg me, this time verbally instead of on the computer.

Someone does something funny, and instead of laughing or saying "hehe" or something, people are now actually saying "L-O-L".

I find this ridiculous, coz as you all know, LOL stands for "Laughing out Loud", used to tell people over the computer that you are Laughing (out loud). If you say "LOL", then you technically not Laughing, you are Speaking Out Loud.



Views expressed by me are strictly my own, not of my friends, employer, or anyone else, unless otherwise stated.
*Back at RP for a limited time only*
 
s
ParkesHub Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jul 29, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 30, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 9:33 pm
zipitidoodah wrote:

[*]Incorrect usage of "their", "they're" and "there". To check it:
  1. If it makes sense when replaced with "they are" then you can use "they're".
  2. If referring to an object as belonging to someone else, as in "it was their apples" then you should use "their".
  3. If saying "over there" then you should use "there".
I think the most common mistake is when people mean to say something like "they are going to fix the tap tomorrow" and they say "their going to fix the tap tomorrow" instead.[/list]
P


I think he's talking to you, Riccardo!!! Laughing


zipitidoodah wrote:


Most of all the apostrophes annoy me, like when "All CD's are 20% off". There is no reason to use an apostrophe so it should be "CDs". Similarly, if you were talking about G classes or VQDW wagons (to make it more relevant ) you should not say "I saw lots of G's and VQDW's today" but instead "I saw lots of Gs and VQDWs today". The only problem I have with that is that it's tempting to use an apostrophe in some situations like that, however incorrect, just to ensure people understand what you say.


The apostrophe implies ownership of the following noun:-

"The cat's dinner is over there". i.e. The cat owns the dinner

-and-

"All cats like their dinner"

No apostrophe as cats is plural.

And:-

"CDs are cheap at JB HiFi."

No apostrophe as the plural is implied...as, remove the abbreviations, it would really read:-
"Compact disks are cheap at JB HiFi."
 
s
John of Melbourne The Ghost of George Stephenson   Joined: Jan 30, 2003
Last Visited: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Melbourne suburbs


contact

post
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 10:32 pm
zipitidoodah wrote:
Apostrophes and plurals. Apostrophes are used to show either ownership or contractions.
  • Ownership: if the dog belongs to Jack, then it is "Jack's dog". If you need to add an apostrophe and an "s" to a name that already ends in "s", like "Charles", then you can make it "Charles's" or you can say "Charles' ". The only exception is when using the word "it" to say that the "dog" belongs to "it", in which case noapostrophe is used and you just say "its". The only time you use "it's" with the apostrophe is when you could be saying "it is" instead.
This applies to all pronouns, not just it. Thus, hers, theirs, ours, etc. do not have apostrophes.
 
s
Sonofagunzel Chief Commissioner   Joined: Nov 18 2003
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 10:59 pm
(I promised myself I wouldn't do this, but I'm just a slave to temptation ....)

zipitidoodah wrote:

"NOT if you just feel the word should have capitals"
"it was their apples"

Laughing

In fairness, I'm annoyed by bad grammar and bad spelling as well. I don't mind the chat-english, though - I enjoy the challenge!



SOAG
 
s
Tonymercury Dr Beeching   Joined: May 17, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 28, 2008
Location: Botany NSW


contact

post
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 5:05 am
Nick Moss wrote:
No one likes people being pedantic about the way they speak/write, but at the same time, no one likes having to spend 10 minutes trying to work out what on earth is being said, when they shouldn't have to...

NM


And just as importantly, there's the Archives aspect to consider, especially with, for example, spelling.

Note that a large number of the posters here think that the a place called "Eveleigh" is spelt "Everleigh" and than have pity on anyone looking for information later.



Tony Bailey
A Yahoo Groups that may be of interest-
RailNewsInternational
A group designed to disseminate International news items.
To subscribe to it, you can just send a blank e-mail to-
RailNewsInternational-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
 
s
jm1941 Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jan 16, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 30, 2008
Location: Mount Gambier


contact

post
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 8:48 am
zipitidoodah wrote:

Incorrect usage of "their", "they're" and "there". To check it:

[*] If it makes sense when replaced with "they are" then you can use "they're".
[*] If referring to an object as belonging to someone else, as in "it was their apples" then you should use "their".
[*] If saying "over there" then you should use "there".

Well put together zipitidoodah.

I always had trouble with "their" and "there", as to which one to use. Was only in later years I got around this when I went to type "their" or "there". The only way I could get it right, was to remember to equate here as to there.
I went over there yesterday. Here, there, both have ere.
So if the ball went over their fence, it was eir. (as you say belonging to someone else)

It is strange how at times we use complicated ways to arrive at something simple. Have no trouble last couple of years since using forums and emailing. This has taught me a lot as to the importance of English and at least basic grammar (if there is such a word as basic grammar) which I dearly hated at school, (some 48 years ago) but since having a computer I soon realised these two, English and grammar are important in communicating properly.

Before computers I never wrote letters, all communication was verbal, face to face, or over the phone. So for us old farts the computer has sort of made us go back to school. YUK, but of course, necessary.

I wonder how many did read all of your post and at least digested a little. Wink

Regards,  
s
Nexas The Ghost of George Stephenson   Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 26, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 10:00 am
jm1941 wrote:

I wonder how many did read all of your post and at least digested a little. Wink

Regards,


I did, however I knew all that stuff already.

Except I confess to the "CD's" one... even though I know I've always known it shouldn't have an apostrophe, I just seem to have a habit of using one in those situations.



Views expressed by me are strictly my own, not of my friends, employer, or anyone else, unless otherwise stated.
*Back at RP for a limited time only*
 
s
TheLoadedDog El Sombrero!   Joined: Jun 19, 2003
Last Visited: Sep 28, 2008
Location: Macquarie Fields NSW


contact

post
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 10:27 am
zipitidoodah wrote:

Most of all the apostrophes annoy me, like when "All CD's are 20% off". There is no reason to use an apostrophe so it should be "CDs". Similarly, if you were talking about G classes or VQDW wagons (to make it more relevant Smile ) you should not say "I saw lots of G's and VQDW's today" but instead "I saw lots of Gs and VQDWs today". The only problem I have with that is that it's tempting to use an apostrophe in some situations like that, however incorrect, just to ensure people understand what you say.

I will take issue with this (because that's the kind of guy I am Wink ). Okay, what you are saying entirely fits with my gut instinct of what "looks right". However, it is acceptable usage these days to insert an apostrophe in such cases, pricisely for the reasons of clarity you mentioned. It looks clumsy, but it works. This is especially true on all-caps signage.

Another pet hate I forgot to mention is misuse of collective and singular nouns.

"CityRail have increased fares."
WRONG!

"CityRail has increased fares".
CORRECT!

There is only one CityRail (and thank God for THAT, you say). You see this creeping into news broadcasts a lot: "The Australian side have beaten the West Indies". It sets my teeth on edge, it really does. It may well be a few guys, but it is ONE team, so it's "The Australian side HAS beaten...."

If you really want me to get pedantic (go on, you know you want to), then use of the word "none" requires special care too. Consider this: "None of the Millennium trains are running during the morning peak." Nothing wrong there, you might think. Actually, it should be "None of the Millennium trains is running during the morning peak." But "Woah there Big Fella, it's trains, innit? Plural! Haha. Gotcha."

Well, no. A plural is more than one. "None" is obviously NOT more than one. Don't let the 's' fool you. Now saying it the proper way may sound a little bit stilted, which is why it's fine to say 'are' these days if you wish. Language is an evolving thing. That's what it's all about. If you try to regulate it, you'll kill it. This is what the French have done to theirs.

"The group of fifteen Tangaras is due for cleaning." This is also correct. There may well be fifteen trains, but you use 'is' instead of 'are' because there is only one group. "The fifteen Tangaras are due for cleaning" would also be correct.

(Edited for, of all things, grammar. I slay me, really. I also slay myself.)
 
s
ParkesHub Chief Commissioner   Joined: Jul 29, 2003
Last Visited: Nov 30, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 11:52 am
TheLoadedDog™ wrote:
zipitidoodah wrote:

Most of all the apostrophes annoy me, like when "All CD's are 20% off". There is no reason to use an apostrophe so it should be "CDs". Similarly, if you were talking about G classes or VQDW wagons (to make it more relevant Smile ) you should not say "I saw lots of G's and VQDW's today" but instead "I saw lots of Gs and VQDWs today". The only problem I have with that is that it's tempting to use an apostrophe in some situations like that, however incorrect, just to ensure people understand what you say.

I will take issue with this (because that's the kind of guy I am Wink ). Okay, what you are saying entirely fits with my gut instinct of what "looks right". However, it is acceptable usage these days to insert an apostrophe in such cases, pricisely for the reasons of clarity you mentioned. It looks clumsy, but it works. This is especially true on all-caps signage.

Another pet hate I forgot to mention is misuse of collective and singular nouns.

"CityRail have increased fares."
WRONG!

"CityRail has increased fares".
CORRECT!

There is only one CityRail (and thank God for THAT, you say). You see this creeping into news broadcasts a lot: "The Australian side have beaten the West Indies". It sets my teeth on edge, it really does. It may well be a few guys, but it is ONE team, so it's "The Australian side HAS beaten...."

If you really want me to get pedantic (go on, you know you want to), then use of the word "none" requires special care too. Consider this: "None of the Millennium trains are running during the morning peak." Nothing wrong there, you might think. Actually, it should be "None of the Millennium trains is running during the morning peak." But "Woah there Big Fella, it's trains, innit? Plural! Haha. Gotcha."

Well, no. A plural is more than one. "None" is obviously NOT more than one. Don't let the 's' fool you. Now saying it the proper way may sound a little bit stilted, which is why it's fine to say 'are' these days if you wish. Language is an evolving thing. That's what it's all about. If you try to regulate it, you'll kill it. This is what the French have done to theirs.

"The group of fifteen Tangaras is due for cleaning." This is also correct. There may well be fifteen trains, but you use 'is' instead of 'are' because there is only one group. "The fifteen Tangaras are due for cleaning" would also be correct.

(Edited for, of all things, grammar. I slay me, really. I also slay myself.)


Good post, LD!

The apostrophes only look correct because so many people make the error!! Smile
 
s
Sonofagunzel Chief Commissioner   Joined: Nov 18 2003
Last Visited: Dec 1, 2008


contact

post
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 12:16 pm
If those Tangaras take two days to clean, is it two days work or two days' work? I think it's the latter.



SOAG
 
s
J549 Chief Train Controller   Joined: Jun 18, 2003
Last Visited: Apr 28, 2004
Location: Werribee, Melbourne


contact

post
Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2004 12:55 pm
All of a sudden i feel like im back in grade 4 english class Smile



Andy.
member of VGR/CMR.

M>train...another one bites the dust
 
s
Display from:   

Post new thread Reply to thread Railpage Australia™ Forum Index -> General
Page 2 of 24  [ Previous thread ] :: [ Next thread ] Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 22, 23, 24  Next

All times are GMT + 10 Hours




Jump to:  
You cannot post new threads in this forum
You cannot reply to threads in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Powered by phpBB 2.0.6 © 2001 phpBB Group

Theme images and concept © 2004 by Michael Greenhill and Railpage, All Rights Reserved.
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Forums ©



Web site powered by PHP-NukeAll logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2008 Interactive Omnimedia

You can syndicate our news using the news ticker or one of the RSS feeds
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2003 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved.
PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.859 Seconds -- Current Server Load: 0.61%