• Login to Railpage
  • Information
    • Lineside Locations
    • Liveries
    • Locomotives
    • Organisations
    • Railcams
    • Sightings
  • Correspondence
    • Forums
    • News Index
    • News Archive
    • Polls
  • Content
    • Photos
    • Photo competitions
    • Old gallery
    • Jobs
    • Downloads
    • Timetables
    • Links
    • Events Calendar
    • Rail Passes
    • Railpage Websites
  • Website
    • Ideas
    • Advanced Search
    • Statistics
    • Forums Statistics
    • Bookmarklets
    • Feedback
    • Copyright
    • Membership List
    • Platform Status
    • Donate
    • Twitter
  • Help
    • Glossary
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • Rules for Posting
    • Website Help & FAQ

Railpage

 

 
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Victoria
  • Victorian Budget - 2014 BLOG
    • About Railpage
    • Railpage Australia™
    • Help For Beginners
    • Locations
    • News
    • Australian Railway News
    • New South Wales
    • Sydney Suburban
    • Victoria
    • Melbourne suburban
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Tasmania
    • Western Australia
    • NT
    • ACT
    • Operators
    • Locomotives and Rolling Stock
    • Signalling and Infrastructure
    • Sightings
    • General
    • Australian Rail Employment
    • Trams and Light Rail
    • Simulator Forums
    • MSTS General Discussions
    • MSTS Routes
    • MSTS 3D
    • Trainz General Discussions
    • MetroMSTS Projects
    • MS Train Simulator X
    • Open Rails
    • BVE Trainsim
    • Train Simulator
    • Model Railways
    • Model Railways - General Discussions
    • Special Interest Groups
    • Australian Miniature Railways
    • Gheringhap Loop
    • Railway Archaeology
    • Railway Photography
    • Radio and Scanning Discussions
    • RTSA
    • Other Transport
    • The Bogies
    • Railway Preservation and Tourism
    • Preservation and Tourist Railways
    • International Railway News
    • International Discussion
    • General Forums
    • The Lounge
    • Test Forum
    • Armchair Operators
    • Archived Threads
    Bogong posted 07 May 2014 16:13
    Posted in Victoria » Victorian Budget - 2014 BLOG

    The new tunnel will serve Dandenong* Frankston line passengers and in addition to the new stations (at Domain and Montague) it will stop at four of the five city loop stations (bypassing Flinders St). By contrast the original tunnel proposal would have only stopped at two of the city stations (Melb Central and Flinders St.).

    Now to me, a train stopping at 80% of the stations in the CBD is likely to be much more valuable than one stopping at only 40%. So whatever the other relative merits of the old plan and the new plan may be, the new plan will be much more useful to the majority of people travelling to the city.

    * Edited to correct error pointed out by Railblogger

    Edit history

    Edited 07 May 2014 17:01, 7 years ago, edited by Bogong

    The new tunnel will serve Dandenong Frankston line passengers and in addition to the new stations (at Domain and Montague) it will stop at four of the five city loop stations (bypassing Flinders St). By contrast the original tunnel proposal would have only stopped at two of the city stations (Melb Central and Flinders St.).

    Now to me, a train stopping at 80% of the stations in the CBD is likely to be much more valuable than one stopping at only 40%. So whatever the other relative merits of the old plan and the new plan may be, the new plan will be much more useful to the majority of people travelling to the city.

    Edited to correct error.

    Edited 07 May 2014 16:58, 7 years ago, edited by Bogong

    The new tunnel will serve Dandenong line passengers and in addition to the new stations (at Domain and Montague) it will stop at four of the five city loop stations (bypassing Flinders St). By contrast the original tunnel proposal would have only stopped at two of the city stations (Melb Central and Flinders St.).

    Now to me, a train stopping at 80% of the stations in the CBD is likely to be much more valuable than one stopping at only 40%. So whatever the other relative merits of the old plan and the new plan may be, the new plan will be much more useful to the majority of people travelling to the city.

    Edited 07 May 2014 16:15, 7 years ago, edited by Bogong

    The new tunnel will serve Dandenong line passengers and in addition to the new stations (at Domain and Montague) it will stop at four of the five city loop stations (bypassing Flinders St). By contrast the original tunnel proposal would have only stopped at two of the city stations (Melb Central and Flinders St.).

    Now to me, a train stopping at 80% of the stations in the CBD is likely to be more valuable than one stopping at only 40%. So whatever the other relative merits of the old plan and the new plan may be, the new plan will be much more useful to the majority of people travelling to the city.

    Edited 07 May 2014 16:14, 7 years ago, edited by Bogong

    The new tunnel will serve Dandenong line passengers and in addition to the new stations (at Domain and Montague) it will stop at four of the five city loop stations (bypassing Flinders St). By contrast the original tunnel proposal would have only stopped at two of the loop stations.

    Now to me, a train stopping at 80% of the stations in the CBD is likely to be more valuable than one stopping at only 40%. So whatever the other relative merits of the old plan and the new plan may be, the new plan will be much more useful to the majority of people travelling to the city.

    About this website

    Railpage version 3.10.0.0037

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2021 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.

    You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.

    View mobile site

    Stats for nerds

    Gen time: 0.294s | RAM: 6.29kb