I don't see why the liberals have got that has been howard to campaign for them, especially when he as "instructed by" (oh sooorrry I mean "followed") Bush jnr into the invasion of Iraq for oil.
Invading for oil, nonsense, it would be far easier and cheaper to simply buy the oil.
I don't believe it is nonsense. The invasion was due to those three letters.
Okay then, if you believe it is nonsense, then why didn't Bush jnr do the same to that Dictator Mgambee Thug,
and threaten to invade Zimbabwe?
Anyone else want to answer that first?
Also if you believe it was nonsense, then when Bush was "invited
" to Australia, why did he say OPEC at first, instead of APEC? I thought he would have been more careful with the wording.
Oh by the way, just for your info, the vote compass thinks I'm more aligned with the Liberals.
As stated before, both parties are as bad as each other.
If Tony Abbott becomes PM next Saturday, he has already stated that he supports military action in Syria. Let's put this way, the election is on the 7th, Obama has to wait to the 9th for a decision. Britain has already said no.Edit:
By the way, if anyone heard Pauline Hanson this morning, she DOES
support genuine refugees, and despite what others say, she wants REDUCED immigration, not to stop immigration.