There may be a thread on this, or it may be buried in a thread somewhere, but can someone tell me what the technical reason is for the inability to run trains from the airport line to Town Hall, Wynyard and onto North Sydney etc?The reason is that the line branches off on the wrong side of Central Electric.
There may be a thread on this, or it may be buried in a thread somewhere, but can someone tell me what the technical reason is for the inability to run trains from the airport line to Town Hall, Wynyard and onto North Sydney etc?
There may be a thread on this, or it may be buried in a thread somewhere, but can someone tell me what the technical reason is for the inability to run trains from the airport line to Town Hall, Wynyard and onto North Sydney etc?The reason is that the line branches off on the wrong side of Central Electric.
Also the tunnels emerge too close to the station.
You can't physically get a train from Platform 22 to Platform 16.
It would require a huge ladder of crossovers between Central and Liverpool Street conflicting with every other movement.
Had the tunnel emerged South of the flying junctions, trains could have been routed to the North Shore and the Northern line via Chatswood using connections already in place.
The unused platforms at Redfern could have been incorporated as well, giving better connections to the West.
M636C
There may be a thread on this, or it may be buried in a thread somewhere, but can someone tell me what the technical reason is for the inability to run trains from the airport line to Town Hall, Wynyard and onto North Sydney etc?Crossover issues aside, there may also have been a capacity issue as well - could the North Shore Line have handled the extra trains without having to have other services redirected around the City Circle?
The glaring need for the Airport Line is not the inability to run trains to North Sydney (or anywhere else for that matter), but the low capacity generally, and particularly on the weekend. Saturday and Sunday mornings are huge for arriving and departing international flyers, whilst the peak times for domestic business travellers also coincide with peak times for suburban commuters, making the already-crowded trains unattractive. The logistics of movement of people and their luggage at Central is also a poorly-designed hazard.Why not get some single decks with 3 doors and increase capacity from 20 DD's to 20 DD's + 8-10 SD's per hour. Run them from Ashfield all the way around to Kingsgrove via the airport line.
There is a way to increase airport train capacity but without a corresponding investment in capital works at Central, I am loathe to suggest it. There needs to be two additional elevators on P22/23, to spread the load.
Additional trains can be run between Central and Kingsgrove Turnback. Utilise P22 as a turnback platform for two train in-between the Down Bankstown services. Train on the Up uses 850 points to cross to the Down Airport, and 636 points to cross to Down Illawarra Local to terminate at P22. A new crew is waiting for it so the dwell is 2 minutes only.
An extra 8tph in both directions, serving the airport stations without carrying a load of suburban commuters and schoolkids, can be added between 09:00 and 16:00 by this configuration. I haven't yet analysed the timetable to see how many could be added in peak, but it would be >0 and anything is good.
A simple way of increasing the capacity of the airport line is to run more trains via sydneham.
After the bankstown is made a metro and extension of the east hills quadding to east hills itself (to cater for xpt and xplorer trains that use this route) , some good stopping patterns would be.
OFF PEAK
- 4tph city circle to macarthur via east hills and sydenham. (express stopping pattern)
- 4tph city circle to campbeltown via airport (express stopping pattern)
- 4tph city circle to revesby via airport (all stops)
- 4TPH city circle to kingsgrove via airport (all stops, possibility of using 4 car trains)
that means 12 tph to and from the airport
Peak
- 6tph city circle to mcarthur via east hills and sydenham. (express stopping pattern)
- 6tph city circle to campbeltown via airport (express stopping pattern)
- 6tph city circle to revesby via airport (all stops)
- 4TPH city circle to kingsgrove via airport (all stops, possibility of using 4 car trains)
that means 16 tph at the airport, which is enough.
So you basically are saying that the Sydney network should get some of the new Brisbane trains.The glaring need for the Airport Line is not the inability to run trains to North Sydney (or anywhere else for that matter), but the low capacity generally, and particularly on the weekend. Saturday and Sunday mornings are huge for arriving and departing international flyers, whilst the peak times for domestic business travellers also coincide with peak times for suburban commuters, making the already-crowded trains unattractive. The logistics of movement of people and their luggage at Central is also a poorly-designed hazard.Why not get some single decks with 3 doors and increase capacity from 20 DD's to 20 DD's + 8-10 SD's per hour. Run them from Ashfield all the way around to Kingsgrove via the airport line.
There is a way to increase airport train capacity but without a corresponding investment in capital works at Central, I am loathe to suggest it. There needs to be two additional elevators on P22/23, to spread the load.
Additional trains can be run between Central and Kingsgrove Turnback. Utilise P22 as a turnback platform for two train in-between the Down Bankstown services. Train on the Up uses 850 points to cross to the Down Airport, and 636 points to cross to Down Illawarra Local to terminate at P22. A new crew is waiting for it so the dwell is 2 minutes only.
An extra 8tph in both directions, serving the airport stations without carrying a load of suburban commuters and schoolkids, can be added between 09:00 and 16:00 by this configuration. I haven't yet analysed the timetable to see how many could be added in peak, but it would be >0 and anything is good.
Really, this is not a big deal. If you look at the satellite image on Google Maps, only two tracks need to have a crossing.There may be a thread on this, or it may be buried in a thread somewhere, but can someone tell me what the technical reason is for the inability to run trains from the airport line to Town Hall, Wynyard and onto North Sydney etc?The reason is that the line branches off on the wrong side of Central Electric.
Also the tunnels emerge too close to the station.
You can't physically get a train from Platform 22 to Platform 16.
It would require a huge ladder of crossovers between Central and Liverpool Street conflicting with every other movement.
Had the tunnel emerged South of the flying junctions, trains could have been routed to the North Shore and the Northern line via Chatswood using connections already in place.
The unused platforms at Redfern could have been incorporated as well, giving better connections to the West.
M636C
No I am saying something more like the original Bradfield car. Brisbanes, Perth's, Adelaides and Melbournes trains are all too long. 4 doors, 3.1 metres wide and 20 metres in length just like the original SD's in Sydney. This is also to supplement the DD's and not replace DD's. It's not like it hasn't happened before in Sydney.So you basically are saying that the Sydney network should get some of the new Brisbane trains.The glaring need for the Airport Line is not the inability to run trains to North Sydney (or anywhere else for that matter), but the low capacity generally, and particularly on the weekend. Saturday and Sunday mornings are huge for arriving and departing international flyers, whilst the peak times for domestic business travellers also coincide with peak times for suburban commuters, making the already-crowded trains unattractive. The logistics of movement of people and their luggage at Central is also a poorly-designed hazard.Why not get some single decks with 3 doors and increase capacity from 20 DD's to 20 DD's + 8-10 SD's per hour. Run them from Ashfield all the way around to Kingsgrove via the airport line.
There is a way to increase airport train capacity but without a corresponding investment in capital works at Central, I am loathe to suggest it. There needs to be two additional elevators on P22/23, to spread the load.
Additional trains can be run between Central and Kingsgrove Turnback. Utilise P22 as a turnback platform for two train in-between the Down Bankstown services. Train on the Up uses 850 points to cross to the Down Airport, and 636 points to cross to Down Illawarra Local to terminate at P22. A new crew is waiting for it so the dwell is 2 minutes only.
An extra 8tph in both directions, serving the airport stations without carrying a load of suburban commuters and schoolkids, can be added between 09:00 and 16:00 by this configuration. I haven't yet analysed the timetable to see how many could be added in peak, but it would be >0 and anything is good.
Really, this is not a big deal. If you look at the satellite image on Google Maps, only two tracks need to have a crossing.There may be a thread on this, or it may be buried in a thread somewhere, but can someone tell me what the technical reason is for the inability to run trains from the airport line to Town Hall, Wynyard and onto North Sydney etc?The reason is that the line branches off on the wrong side of Central Electric.
Also the tunnels emerge too close to the station.
You can't physically get a train from Platform 22 to Platform 16.
It would require a huge ladder of crossovers between Central and Liverpool Street conflicting with every other movement.
Had the tunnel emerged South of the flying junctions, trains could have been routed to the North Shore and the Northern line via Chatswood using connections already in place.
The unused platforms at Redfern could have been incorporated as well, giving better connections to the West.
M636C
The Up New Southern (refer to the trackplan on the Wikipedia page for Central) needs a crossover right at the tunnel exit crossing over and joining the Up Illawarra track from Redfern platform 9. Then trains can cross to the left using the new crossing, then again, and again, and again onto platform 16.
Or, what could happen is the trains could cross over to platform 20, then move across a new crossover between the tracks on platform 19 and 20. But, I guess this would disrupt a lot of traffic on platforms 19, 18, 17 and 16. So I guess the first option is probably better, both because it is spaced away from the station, and also because it uses the track from Redfern platform 9 (which is not used much).
There may be a thread on this, or it may be buried in a thread somewhere, but can someone tell me what the technical reason is for the inability to run trains from the airport line to Town Hall, Wynyard and onto North Sydney etc?Airport is Sector 2.
You cannot use SD trains in Sydney to a greater advantage than DD's because you cannot have middle doors due to the frequent large gaps at many stations. The Metro will have straight platforms on the new section and existing U/G stations, but the Bankstown line needs to have a number of platforms rebuilt or modified.No I am saying something more like the original Bradfield car. Brisbanes, Perth's, Adelaides and Melbournes trains are all too long. 4 doors, 3.1 metres wide and 20 metres in length just like the original SD's in Sydney. This is also to supplement the DD's and not replace DD's. It's not like it hasn't happened before in Sydney.Why not get some single decks with 3 doors and increase capacity from 20 DD's to 20 DD's + 8-10 SD's per hour. Run them from Ashfield all the way around to Kingsgrove via the airport line.So you basically are saying that the Sydney network should get some of the new Brisbane trains.
You cannot use SD trains in Sydney to a greater advantage than DD's because you cannot have middle doors due to the frequent large gaps at many stations. The Metro will have straight platforms on the new section and existing U/G stations, but the Bankstown line needs to have a number of platforms rebuilt or modified.No I am saying something more like the original Bradfield car. Brisbanes, Perth's, Adelaides and Melbournes trains are all too long. 4 doors, 3.1 metres wide and 20 metres in length just like the original SD's in Sydney. This is also to supplement the DD's and not replace DD's. It's not like it hasn't happened before in Sydney.Why not get some single decks with 3 doors and increase capacity from 20 DD's to 20 DD's + 8-10 SD's per hour. Run them from Ashfield all the way around to Kingsgrove via the airport line.So you basically are saying that the Sydney network should get some of the new Brisbane trains.
So no, it hasn't happened before in Sydney.
I'm pretty sure that the North Shore Line is part of Sector 3 and that Sector 1 was the Eastern Suburbs and Illawarra Line; the Sector and T numbers don't align.There may be a thread on this, or it may be buried in a thread somewhere, but can someone tell me what the technical reason is for the inability to run trains from the airport line to Town Hall, Wynyard and onto North Sydney etc?Airport is Sector 2.
North Shore is Sector 1.
It is best to keep the sectors separate.
Central now has lifts at the Northern end of the platforms.
Interchange between Sectors 1 and 2 would be improved if lifts were provided at the southern end of the platforms.
We've disabled Quick Reply for this thread as it was last updated more than six months ago.