and that is just for a start
It makes more sense to close some of the less used stations and extend the light rail now. It could service all the traffic generators as well as the two or three important stations left open, and provide direct transport to the downtown area.The problem with that is that the LR would likely only go down main streets, also many of the locations have roads that would need improvements and widening.
I have said all I can say on this topic, but I believe you are wrong in a couple of areas, in one of them you finally reveal the hospital that is close by, and putting a new station no matter the facilities on it, and a lift would be need to get passengers up to the main road above the tunnel. A road into the station on the hospital side would be feasible but a huge added expense, and another set of traffic lights on a road littered with them. The distance to John Hunter hospital for rail passengers also rules out any prospect of patronage there.When I talked about a hospital being close to the railway line, I was referring to the Calvary Mater Hospital in Waratah West, a station at the Maud St bridge could serve this hospital and the surrounding areas.
The other one is not stopping at BMD, on every occasion I have travelled to Sydney and back, especially in the morning needing to be in Sydney before lunch time, also travelling on weekends both Hamilton and BMD station have a very large number of passengers getting on and off, in fact I would suggest that BMD possibly has the largest number of passengers than any other station past Wyong on the CCL.
You want more trains to attract passengers but kill off perhaps the busiest one in the area!
Has it ever crossed your mind to run this harebrained proposal past the relevant State MP's as opposed to continuously flogging the dead horse on this 'platform'?This is merely a platform to express opinion, if people like a6et are going to respond, I will politely respond back, if no one responds, neither will I.
I'm certain that you'd still reciecve a polite go away, similar to A6's
Probably academic anyway considering that the popularity vote has just taken place
It makes more sense to close some of the less used stations and extend the light rail now. It could service all the traffic generators as well as the two or three important stations left open, and provide direct transport to the downtown area.First you need to ask the question; 'why are these stations rarely used?'
Has anyone mentioned a better class of passenger, built in scum and bogan detectors, automatic deodorant sprayers, electronic countermeasures to stop loud music, dogs to savage anyone with their feet on the seats?Maybe being one of the most difficult places to find work might have something to do with that class of passengers?
and that is just for a start
The problem with that is that the LR would likely only go down main streets, also many of the locations have roads that would need improvements and widening.Regarding the people who want the options but won't use them, make it so driving is not so convenient, replace roundabouts with more traffic lights (slowing down the speed of car travel and allowing pedestrians to cross the road) and implement paid parking and tolls (which can be used to fund public transport) for those who don't need to drive, and half the adult fare (since petrol can be competitive with adult fares).
People who live, especially those born in Ncle are very parochial people indeed, they would love all the options but how many would use them anyway? LR, would have the same problems as buses do now, as to where they go to, the routes they serve and the like. LR or trams which one basically refers to old styles and the other modern types, need to have their own routings to be a success.
I can remember the old Sydney trams and they used many main roads into and out of the CBD along with running through park areas, such as out to the SCG area, now taken over by buses. The cost and time to build LR along with severe inconvenience to those around the areas of construction will be both a nightmare and expensive.
The bug bear of the stations between Fassifern and BMD, is that adequate alternative transport options are available and conveniently so for most in NCL area. A new access road on the Western side of Booragul is now put in place and perhaps a small parking area is planned for the new estate there, how many will use it? but the land developer pays for that not the gov.
Out of all the stations in between, maybe Cockle Ck may get more patronage when the new estate is eventually finished, but that's some time away.
Has anyone mentioned a better class of passenger, built in scum and bogan detectors, automatic deodorant sprayers, electronic countermeasures to stop loud music, dogs to savage anyone with their feet on the seats?There'd be a lot of empty trains although revenue wouldn't suffer much.
and that is just for a start
one could postulate that there would be a significant saving in cleaning and deoderising alsoHas anyone mentioned a better class of passenger, built in scum and bogan detectors, automatic deodorant sprayers, electronic countermeasures to stop loud music, dogs to savage anyone with their feet on the seats?There'd be a lot of empty trains although revenue wouldn't suffer much.
and that is just for a start
Ethan, perhaps if you spell out some areas in the original post such as identifying the hospital it would help people to understand more of what you are saying/want. The Mater hospital is closer to PT, and that includes rail transport than the RNS is too St Leonards in Sydney. The Mater hospital is also a specialised hospital rather than a general one, unless urgent bed needs are required, as such its unlikely to attract people to it even if the station was moved to where you suggest.A station at Waratah West serving the Mater Hospital would not only just serve people needing to go to said hospital, but also employees, as the health sector is a large employer. And a station in that location would also serve the moderately dense residential area.
Thing is, there has to be reality in proposals weighted against desire. Also penalising motorists or any other section of the community with the removal of roundabouts and replace with traffic lights, is in many ways unrealistic, but, in many areas that actually makes for better traffic flows, as the end of the M1, John Renshaw drive demonstrates especially in the peak hour traffic rather than holiday time peaks.
This is quite a sore point with me: appalling pedestrian access to Public Transport facilities.
Some notable issues on the South Coast:
It's all but impossible to walk from Shellharbour Village to Shellharbour Junction station. The access paths to Shellharbour Rd (the most direct way) are fenced off! The only way is indirectly along Dunmore Rd, which has no pedestrian facilities or even access.
Oak Flats station is just under 1000m from Oak Flats Village, but there are no pedestrian facilities to get across Pioneer Drive. It's an 800m detour for pedestrians. It's even harder to get from Shellharbour City/Stockland on foot. It should be a pleasant 20-30min walk, but it's not.
Albion Park village - and the 100k people living in the new housing estates there, at Mt Terry and now Calderwood, literally has no pedestrian access to Albion Park rail at all (unless you count making the 3km detour along the flood prone bike paths in Croome Park).
The only reason to use Bombo station is to go to the beach there, but it's almost a 1000m walk to get from the station to anywhere you can cross the highway, or the railway to get anywhere else. People used to get the train then wander over the tracks informally to the beach. All that is fenced off now. However it does have a bus bay and a small commuter parking lot.
East side of Ununderra is another example: a small one lane road bridge (and this is used quite a bit by tourists naively getting the train down to the Nan Tien Temple).
I think this just illustrates just how car dominated the transport thinking is. WTF is the point of providing car only access to public transport facilities? By definition, the people using PT arn't going to have a car with them!
And the worst issue is station spacing, with new stations being needed at Mount St Thomas (Figtree), something between Unanderra and Kembla Grange, Brownsville, Penrose, Yallah, and Blackbutt.
And djf01 did bring up a hole list of pedstrian issues on this stretch of line.
And the worst issue is station spacing, with new stations being needed at Mount St Thomas (Figtree), something between Unanderra and Kembla Grange, Brownsville, Penrose, Yallah, and Blackbutt.
And the worst issue is station spacing, with new stations being needed at Mount St Thomas (Figtree), something between Unanderra and Kembla Grange, Brownsville, Penrose, Yallah, and Blackbutt.
And djf01 did bring up a hole list of pedstrian issues on this stretch of line.
This is what constitutes pedestrian access to Albion Park from Howards Bay (ie Yallah): a metre of freeway shoulder.
https://i.imgur.com/Aak9aZ1.png
It should be a pleasant 20min (at most) walk to Albion Pk Station, less than 2000m away as the crow flies.
But it's not. In fact it's not really possible to walk there at all - except perhaps illegally walking over the railway bridge.
In my view the station spacing is already fine. Mt St Thomas sort of looks reasonable from space, but like almost everywhere else in the Illawarra, there is no reasonable pedestrian access to Figtree anyway. Conniston station captures just as much of Mt St Thomas as any new station on the existing line would.Without said pedestrian access to Figtree, a Mt St Thomas station wouldn't do much benefit (as you mentioned, Coniston captures just as much), that is why reasonable pedestrian access is needed, building lines and stations is one thing, actually letting people access them without a car is another thing.
The only change I would make is replace Bombo and Minnamurra with a better station at Kiama Downs.
A bit off topic, but as no-one even looks down in Armchair operators, some of you here might be interested in this slideshow I made of my South Coast Rail upgrade concept. If it came to fruition, there would not be talk of "Illawarra Suburban Services", anymore than there would be talk of Penrith to Parramatta suburban services. The Illawarra would *be* a suburban zone.I have desire to post in the Armchair operators but don't since I have doubt anyone would bother reading it.
https://youtu.be/EfiCc3GsK94
We've disabled Quick Reply for this thread as it was last updated more than six months ago.