I can't find any mention of this, but Is the bridge over the Princes Highway going to be replaced ? As It currently has a 4.6 Meter clearance, that Is low for a National Highway.Don't Panic Mr Manering. The maximum height that any heavy vehicle truck can legally travel at is 4.3 metres. Any higher than that the truck will need a over dimensional (O.D) permit from vicroads or depending what state you are in your local friendly state road authority. For vehicles higher that 4.6 metres wish to pass through Stratford, there is a O.D. route around the back of Stratford that starts and finishes at the police station at the round abound. The route that the trucks have to take makes the vehicles ford the Avon River on a low level non existent bridge that has water flowing over it the majority of the time.
Further updates https://www.railpage.com.au/news/s/stratford-rail-bridge-works-steam-aheadThe above link when opened shows the local member, Mr Darren Chester who happens to also be the Federal Minister for Veterans Affairs sprouting the benefits of the new and improved rail bridge over the Avon River at Stratford. "trains will now be able to run at 90 kilometres per hours across the new bridge " That's not really much good for passenger trains considering that the Stratford station is right at the end of the bridge. Mr Chester also went onto say that Stratford will get a new skate park as part of the beautification works next to the bridge . The Question that should be asked is 'What happened to the old skate park and the fantastic enclosed timber walled adult size maze that sat on the banks of the Avon River." OHH thats right they both got washed away when the river flooded. It doesn't look like a big river,back in 1998 it washed the rail line away between the Avon River bridge and the 4.6 metre overhead rail bridge that crosses the Princess Highway. so when it floods, shee a beauty mate.
Could log traffic restart to Geelong ?If log traffic restarted to travel westward from Bairnsdale then trains may operate at speeds up to the promised 90 KPH across the Avon River Bridge. The Log yard at Bosworth Road Bairnsdale is always full of logs and timber that has been milled and racked out ready for transport. The loop siding at Bosworth Road is still connected as no loading of timber would take place in the Bairnsdale yard. Timber traffic may depend on who has the wagons and if there are any VFTY wagons at all to be found at all ??? One other freight opportunity that may present itself is the sand mine at the Finger boards, thats if it gets approval to start and if the sand gets moved by rail ????.
Could log traffic restart to Geelong ?With the shutdown of the timber industry imminent, and with most if not all Gippsland operators still shut down post fires i doubt it. Sand mine is still on the cards at the fingerboards, between stratford and bairnsdale, but not for a while, and not if the local community have anything to say about it. No reson an intermodal operator couldnt make use of the bosworth rd sidings either. Some competition for the incumbent primary trucking company up there can only be good.
If log traffic were to start up, in the absence of log wagons, wouldn't it be relatively easy to built and fit 2 or 3 removable frames to container wagons - basically a container floor with folding stakes to hold logs in place? Then they can still be used for other traffic when not required for logs.Could log traffic restart to Geelong ?If log traffic restarted to travel westward from Bairnsdale then trains may operate at speeds up to the promised 90 KPH across the Avon River Bridge. The Log yard at Bosworth Road Bairnsdale is always full of logs and timber that has been milled and racked out ready for transport. The loop siding at Bosworth Road is still connected as no loading of timber would take place in the Bairnsdale yard. Timber traffic may depend on who has the wagons and if there are any VFTY wagons at all to be found at all ??? One other freight opportunity that may present itself is the sand mine at the Finger boards, thats if it gets approval to start and if the sand gets moved by rail ????.
Thats a great idea having the log traffic put on to removable framed or containerizing the flat trucks , I didnt look at it that way. You are correct B67 there is another over dimensional vehicles route around Stratford but I was really focusing on the river and how the O.D route is impassable even with a little bit of water over the O.D.route because its a concrete ford that goes through about a foot of water when the rivers not running hard. I really did forget to mention about the other O.D route . Sorry about that chief .If log traffic were to start up, in the absence of log wagons, wouldn't it be relatively easy to built and fit 2 or 3 removable frames to container wagons - basically a container floor with folding stakes to hold logs in place? Then they can still be used for other traffic when not required for logs.Could log traffic restart to Geelong ?If log traffic restarted to travel westward from Bairnsdale then trains may operate at speeds up to the promised 90 KPH across the Avon River Bridge. The Log yard at Bosworth Road Bairnsdale is always full of logs and timber that has been milled and racked out ready for transport. The loop siding at Bosworth Road is still connected as no loading of timber would take place in the Bairnsdale yard. Timber traffic may depend on who has the wagons and if there are any VFTY wagons at all to be found at all ??? One other freight opportunity that may present itself is the sand mine at the Finger boards, thats if it gets approval to start and if the sand gets moved by rail ????.
And regarding the OD route at Stratford. OD7 is for overdimensional vehicles along Princes Hwy (A1) and takes in Bengworden Road (C106) from Sale and Stratford-Bengworden Rd (C495) at Stratford. The route from the police station is mainly used by traffic to and from Maffra that can't clear the 4.3m bridge on the Stratford-Maffra Rd (C105).
Also the bridge and the viaducts are listed on the Victoria Heritage Register.
https://heritagecouncil.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/HERITAGE-COUNCIL-ENDORSED-REPORT-INCLUSION-Avon-River-Rail-Bridge-6-Dec-2018.pdf
So the government must not alter the design or the structure without stringent approvals. Probably easier to build a new bridge than to adapt the old bridge to higher speeds while conforming to the heritage listing.
Update on construction.Near the start of the video it clearly shows the construction stuff up (on the curve section) that has plauged this bridger (clerances) all its life.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIaiakqKs04
Good to see some limited progress but wonder why they did not consider just lifting the old spans off and replacing them? Was this considered?
The reason the bridge was replaced is to allow the Bairnsdale passenger service to remain open, and to allow freight services to restart in the event that contestable freight is found at some point in the future.
Mineral sands and intermodal loading is the best chance - Bairnsdale is nearly 300km from Melbourne, a contestable distance for rail. The old growth timber industry is on its knees and has been for years, so it is not part of the future - very little plantation timber in East Gippsland. There is a heap of fire damaged timber to be taken out, but it generally has to be shifted within 12 months - so it will go by road. There has also been some interest in use of rail for roadmaking materials, but it requires a rail freight provider to go after the business.The reason the bridge was replaced is to allow the Bairnsdale passenger service to remain open, and to allow freight services to restart in the event that contestable freight is found at some point in the future.
I am really hoping we can get some freight restarted on the line into Bairnsdale.