Welcome to Biden Town

 
  The Vinelander Minister for Railways

Location: Ballan, Victoria on the Ballarat RFR Line
The problem with Don, is similar to the Murdoch media where he gleans his 'information' from, which is how it has...not possibly has, but definitely has been reported in those tabloid papers the reality of a young person who is questioning their gender and how they learn, evolve and accept it to try to come to terms with it.

The prospect that Don relishes to support his feeble argument is that a young person would walk into the other genders toilets/shower block etc which so enrages him, is so unlikely as to be similar to the chances of being hit by a bolt of lightning.

The parents, school professionals including counsellor will have all got together long before Dons theory could ever be realised.
So, as Don raised this invalid issue, I call on him to, from a reputable news source get back to us with a link to a creditable story where this has ever occurred.

As you wrote this tripe in your outraged comments of this ridiculous scenario...it's now for you to prove it has actually occurred and harm was caused as a result of it.

Mike.

Sponsored advertisement

  speedemon08 Mary

Location: I think by now you should have figured it out
The electoral college in the US has certified the results that Biden is the next president.


(Also worth mentioning a week or so before this SCOTUS virtually refused to entertain two lawsuits over lack of actual evidence)
  RTT_Rules Oliver Bullied, CME

Location: Dubai UAE
The electoral college in the US has certified the results that Biden is the next president.


(Also worth mentioning a week or so before this SCOTUS virtually refused to entertain two lawsuits over lack of actual evidence)
speedemon08
Trump had the opportunity to finish his Presidency on a reasonable note, but unfortunately chose the spoiled brat approach where almost every word that has come out of his mouth since the election has proven why who lost the election and should not be POTUS any longer. Even his people are leaving rather wait the final 2mths and his wife has started focus on returning to NYC.

Not sure what a Bidden future will bring, but one day the Pro Trump supporters will finally realise that Bidden didn't win, Trump was fired. Making him the 2nd Republican to be fired from office in 30 years.
  don_dunstan The Ghost of George Stephenson

Location: Adelaide proud
The problem with Don, is similar to the Murdoch media where he gleans his 'information' from, which is how it has...not possibly has, but definitely has been reported in those tabloid papers the reality of a young person who is questioning their gender and how they learn, evolve and accept it to try to come to terms with it.

The prospect that Don relishes to support his feeble argument is that a young person would walk into the other genders toilets/shower block etc which so enrages him, is so unlikely as to be similar to the chances of being hit by a bolt of lightning.

The parents, school professionals including counsellor will have all got together long before Dons theory could ever be realised.
So, as Don raised this invalid issue, I call on him to, from a reputable news source get back to us with a link to a creditable story where this has ever occurred.

As you wrote this tripe in your outraged comments of this ridiculous scenario...it's now for you to prove it has actually occurred and harm was caused as a result of it.

Mike.
The Vinelander
And yet again, an ad hominem without actually answering my question.

And seriously, you need proof that harm is being caused by letting a boy with full male genetalia into the girls changing room - just answer the question, Mike, are you for it or against it?
  speedemon08 Mary

Location: I think by now you should have figured it out
The problem with Don, is similar to the Murdoch media where he gleans his 'information' from, which is how it has...not possibly has, but definitely has been reported in those tabloid papers the reality of a young person who is questioning their gender and how they learn, evolve and accept it to try to come to terms with it.

The prospect that Don relishes to support his feeble argument is that a young person would walk into the other genders toilets/shower block etc which so enrages him, is so unlikely as to be similar to the chances of being hit by a bolt of lightning.

The parents, school professionals including counsellor will have all got together long before Dons theory could ever be realised.
So, as Don raised this invalid issue, I call on him to, from a reputable news source get back to us with a link to a creditable story where this has ever occurred.

As you wrote this tripe in your outraged comments of this ridiculous scenario...it's now for you to prove it has actually occurred and harm was caused as a result of it.

Mike.
And yet again, an ad hominem without actually answering my question.

And seriously, you need proof that harm is being caused by letting a boy with full male genetalia into the girls changing room - just answer the question, Mike, are you for it or against it?
don_dunstan
I see you have seperate gendered bedrooms and closets at home then.
  Dangersdan707 Chief Commissioner

Location: On a Thing with Internet
For the record - THIS is what a 'strawman' argument is. You say that I'm asserting X, and then proceed to attack it.
Don_dunstan


From you on the matter earlier,

So you're okay with mentally ill boys going into girls changing rooms
Don_dunstan



I'm about trying to protect the majority from the behaviour of some (potentially) crazy people who are less than one percent
Don_dunstan
Typical reactionary language

I'll ask you again: Do you support the proposal to allow boys with full male genetalia into girls' changing rooms and showers because they happen to identify as female?
Don_dunstan
I have given a sufficient response that any critical mind can easily deduce, same goes for Mike and co. Fascinating you couldn't see it already.
  don_dunstan The Ghost of George Stephenson

Location: Adelaide proud
For the record - THIS is what a 'strawman' argument is. You say that I'm asserting X, and then proceed to attack it.


From you on the matter earlier,

So you're okay with mentally ill boys going into girls changing rooms



I'm about trying to protect the majority from the behaviour of some (potentially) crazy people who are less than one percent
Typical reactionary language

I'll ask you again: Do you support the proposal to allow boys with full male genetalia into girls' changing rooms and showers because they happen to identify as female?
I have given a sufficient response that any critical mind can easily deduce, same goes for Mike and co. Fascinating you couldn't see it already.
Dangersdan707
Are you okay with boys with a full set of male genetalia going into girls changing rooms and showers? None of you seem capable of answering the actual question. Why is that?

This is reminiscent of when I was damned on Twitter earlier this year for saying that we shouldn't be sorry about Kangaroo Island koalas being dying from the bushfires because they were in pest numbers on the island - people interpreted that as "you hate koalas and want them all dead". No - that's not what I said at all. Prior to the bushfires the SA government spent $8.6 million on sterilising the koala population because they were out of control and destroying native vegetation. They had become serious a pest because they had been introduced to the island and weren't native to that environment - but the state government lacked the balls to actually shoot them and there were disease problems with them being bought to the mainland so apparently no other way other than sterilising them at great expense to the SA taxpayer. So the bushfire did the job for them.

Same as this: I'm not anti-trans, I'm just saying that we have a moral obligation to protect the 99% of the population from the potential bad behaviour of the very tiny less than one percent of boys who MIGHT be claiming they're trans in order to fulfill a sexual perversion. And all of you people have run away with this saying that I'm anti-trans - that's not the damn point. The point is that under-age girls need protection from sexual predators - full-stop. Again, not all of those trans-boys are going to be sexual predators, some of them are genuinely going to feel that they're girls but the risk around this proposed Biden/Harris law and their rush to implement such an ill-thought out idea is enormous.

Again - the end result is boys with full male genetalia going into girls' changing rooms and showers. Now just answer the question - are you okay with that or not?
  don_dunstan The Ghost of George Stephenson

Location: Adelaide proud
The problem with Don, is similar to the Murdoch media where he gleans his 'information' from, which is how it has...not possibly has, but definitely has been reported in those tabloid papers the reality of a young person who is questioning their gender and how they learn, evolve and accept it to try to come to terms with it.

The prospect that Don relishes to support his feeble argument is that a young person would walk into the other genders toilets/shower block etc which so enrages him, is so unlikely as to be similar to the chances of being hit by a bolt of lightning.

The parents, school professionals including counsellor will have all got together long before Dons theory could ever be realised.
So, as Don raised this invalid issue, I call on him to, from a reputable news source get back to us with a link to a creditable story where this has ever occurred.

As you wrote this tripe in your outraged comments of this ridiculous scenario...it's now for you to prove it has actually occurred and harm was caused as a result of it.

Mike.
And yet again, an ad hominem without actually answering my question.

And seriously, you need proof that harm is being caused by letting a boy with full male genetalia into the girls changing room - just answer the question, Mike, are you for it or against it?
I see you have seperate gendered bedrooms and closets at home then.
speedemon08
False analogy.
  speedemon08 Mary

Location: I think by now you should have figured it out
The problem with Don, is similar to the Murdoch media where he gleans his 'information' from, which is how it has...not possibly has, but definitely has been reported in those tabloid papers the reality of a young person who is questioning their gender and how they learn, evolve and accept it to try to come to terms with it.

The prospect that Don relishes to support his feeble argument is that a young person would walk into the other genders toilets/shower block etc which so enrages him, is so unlikely as to be similar to the chances of being hit by a bolt of lightning.

The parents, school professionals including counsellor will have all got together long before Dons theory could ever be realised.
So, as Don raised this invalid issue, I call on him to, from a reputable news source get back to us with a link to a creditable story where this has ever occurred.

As you wrote this tripe in your outraged comments of this ridiculous scenario...it's now for you to prove it has actually occurred and harm was caused as a result of it.

Mike.
And yet again, an ad hominem without actually answering my question.

And seriously, you need proof that harm is being caused by letting a boy with full male genetalia into the girls changing room - just answer the question, Mike, are you for it or against it?
I see you have seperate gendered bedrooms and closets at home then.
False analogy.
don_dunstan
Considering you're a prime candidate for making false analogies in the first place anyway.
  don_dunstan The Ghost of George Stephenson

Location: Adelaide proud
The problem with Don, is similar to the Murdoch media where he gleans his 'information' from, which is how it has...not possibly has, but definitely has been reported in those tabloid papers the reality of a young person who is questioning their gender and how they learn, evolve and accept it to try to come to terms with it.

The prospect that Don relishes to support his feeble argument is that a young person would walk into the other genders toilets/shower block etc which so enrages him, is so unlikely as to be similar to the chances of being hit by a bolt of lightning.

The parents, school professionals including counsellor will have all got together long before Dons theory could ever be realised.
So, as Don raised this invalid issue, I call on him to, from a reputable news source get back to us with a link to a creditable story where this has ever occurred.

As you wrote this tripe in your outraged comments of this ridiculous scenario...it's now for you to prove it has actually occurred and harm was caused as a result of it.

Mike.
And yet again, an ad hominem without actually answering my question.

And seriously, you need proof that harm is being caused by letting a boy with full male genetalia into the girls changing room - just answer the question, Mike, are you for it or against it?
I see you have seperate gendered bedrooms and closets at home then.
False analogy.
Considering you're a prime candidate for making false analogies in the first place anyway.
speedemon08
Point one out for me - a real false analogy that I've made. I bet you can't because you can't even get your mind around what I'm talking about.

You people are all really poor at being able to argue. You get emotional, you get carried away and leave the facts behind. You don't include critical information, you push politically-correct agendas because you think its the right thing to do without being able to defend them.

The only one who has moved up out of all of you is RTT_Rules, who seems to have tactically improved at least in being able to address what the argument fundamentally is rather than wandering off and talking about unrelated things as if they're relevant which was his core weakness. He'd have to get my 'most improved' award for 2020 but the rest of your are all still languishing at the bottom of the class.
  Valvegear Oliver Bullied, CME

Location: Richmond Vic
You people are all really poor at being able to argue. You get emotional, you get carried away and leave the facts behind. You don't include critical information, you push politically-correct agendas because you think its the right thing to do without being able to defend them.

The only one who has moved up out of all of you is RTT_Rules, who seems to have tactically improved at least in being able to address what the argument fundamentally is rather than wandering off and talking about unrelated things as if they're relevant which was his core weakness. He'd have to get my 'most improved' award for 2020 but the rest of your are all still languishing at the bottom of the class.
don_dunstan
We're still waiting for you to put up your evidence, Don.
  Greensleeves Chief Commissioner

Location: If it isn't obvious by now, it should be.
  • "Another one who is okay with boys with full male genitalia showering with girls... good on you. I'm sure the parents of lots of girls will be happy with that policy, after all being a girl is just a state of mind - right?"
  • "... and the fact is that what you're saying here is that you'd rather subject young girls to the sight of full male genitalia and potential sexual assault in what is supposed to be a safe environment just because someone has decided that they're a girl."
  • "This is yet another instance of you projecting your obsession onto me. You're blaming me for the fact that you can't stay away from me because you just love being outraged by things that I say.

    Clearly not my fault you find me so interesting."

That's three from this thread alone.
  mejhammers1 Chief Commissioner

You people are all really poor at being able to argue. You get emotional, you get carried away and leave the facts behind. You don't include critical information, you push politically-correct agendas because you think its the right thing to do without being able to defend them.

The only one who has moved up out of all of you is RTT_Rules, who seems to have tactically improved at least in being able to address what the argument fundamentally is rather than wandering off and talking about unrelated things as if they're relevant which was his core weakness. He'd have to get my 'most improved' award for 2020 but the rest of your are all still languishing at the bottom of the class.
We're still waiting for you to put up your evidence, Don.
Valvegear
It is more likely that I will play Centre Half forward for Geelong. There is a Cabinet post in Bojo's Government that awaits Mr Dunstan.


Michael
  don_dunstan The Ghost of George Stephenson

Location: Adelaide proud
  • "Another one who is okay with boys with full male genitalia showering with girls... good on you. I'm sure the parents of lots of girls will be happy with that policy, after all being a girl is just a state of mind - right?"
  • "... and the fact is that what you're saying here is that you'd rather subject young girls to the sight of full male genitalia and potential sexual assault in what is supposed to be a safe environment just because someone has decided that they're a girl."
  • "This is yet another instance of you projecting your obsession onto me. You're blaming me for the fact that you can't stay away from me because you just love being outraged by things that I say.

    Clearly not my fault you find me so interesting."

That's three from this thread alone.
Greensleeves
Nup, all perfectly valid. That's exactly what the legislation will result in.

And you people ARE obsessed with me - none of you can stay away from my blindingly radiant personality. Not for a moment.

Next.
  DirtyBallast Chief Commissioner

Location: I was here first. You're only visiting.
Just to humour Lord Don, I will suggest that there is far more chance of an innocent young teenage girl being molested by a butch lesbian in the changerooms than a person with male genitalia that has no interest but is unfortunately sporting the wrong tackle. And I don't have to prove it; I can't be stuffed. Wink
  don_dunstan The Ghost of George Stephenson

Location: Adelaide proud
You people are all really poor at being able to argue. You get emotional, you get carried away and leave the facts behind. You don't include critical information, you push politically-correct agendas because you think its the right thing to do without being able to defend them.

The only one who has moved up out of all of you is RTT_Rules, who seems to have tactically improved at least in being able to address what the argument fundamentally is rather than wandering off and talking about unrelated things as if they're relevant which was his core weakness. He'd have to get my 'most improved' award for 2020 but the rest of your are all still languishing at the bottom of the class.
We're still waiting for you to put up your evidence, Don.
Valvegear
Evidence pertaining to what, pray tell? You're actually capable of refuting these things yourself you know. For the umpteenth time, it's an internet chat board, not a Phd thesis. I only reference things when I feel like it, not because someone demands it of me.

If you're too lazy or ignorant to work the mysterious interwebs then perhaps you can apply for a research assistant so you can effectively debunk my arguments without asking me to do it for you.
  mejhammers1 Chief Commissioner

The problem with Don, is similar to the Murdoch media where he gleans his 'information' from, which is how it has...not possibly has, but definitely has been reported in those tabloid papers the reality of a young person who is questioning their gender and how they learn, evolve and accept it to try to come to terms with it.

The prospect that Don relishes to support his feeble argument is that a young person would walk into the other genders toilets/shower block etc which so enrages him, is so unlikely as to be similar to the chances of being hit by a bolt of lightning.

The parents, school professionals including counsellor will have all got together long before Dons theory could ever be realised.
So, as Don raised this invalid issue, I call on him to, from a reputable news source get back to us with a link to a creditable story where this has ever occurred.

As you wrote this tripe in your outraged comments of this ridiculous scenario...it's now for you to prove it has actually occurred and harm was caused as a result of it.

Mike.
The Vinelander
Mike. He knows it is not a problem that he makes it out to be. He is echoing what Mike Huckerbee has said and that man is an utter twat. The overwhelming evidence is that as regards to sex crimes against under aged girls, transgendered males or otherwise wandering into a public toilet is not the problem or the main source. He knows this. Its because it is a Biden/Harris initiative, because that man is an advocate for no one.


Michael
  don_dunstan The Ghost of George Stephenson

Location: Adelaide proud
Just to humour Lord Don, I will suggest that there is far more chance of an innocent young teenage girl being molested by a butch lesbian in the changerooms than a person with male genitalia that has no interest but is unfortunately sporting the wrong tackle. And I don't have to prove it; I can't be stuffed. Wink
DirtyBallast
Nup - as a juvenile girl you're four times more likely to harassed by a boy than a girl.

Not linking it - "can't be stuffed".
  DirtyBallast Chief Commissioner

Location: I was here first. You're only visiting.
You people are all really poor at being able to argue. You get emotional, you get carried away and leave the facts behind. You don't include critical information, you push politically-correct agendas because you think its the right thing to do without being able to defend them.

The only one who has moved up out of all of you is RTT_Rules, who seems to have tactically improved at least in being able to address what the argument fundamentally is rather than wandering off and talking about unrelated things as if they're relevant which was his core weakness. He'd have to get my 'most improved' award for 2020 but the rest of your are all still languishing at the bottom of the class.
We're still waiting for you to put up your evidence, Don.
Evidence pertaining to what, pray tell? You're actually capable of refuting these things yourself you know. For the umpteenth time, it's an internet chat board, not a Phd thesis. I only reference things when I feel like it, not because someone demands it of me.
don_dunstan
Bollocks.

Be a decent human, OWN your words, TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for what you say. If you want to be controversial that's fine, you are free to express your opinions, but they should at least be based on fact!
  DirtyBallast Chief Commissioner

Location: I was here first. You're only visiting.
Just to humour Lord Don, I will suggest that there is far more chance of an innocent young teenage girl being molested by a butch lesbian in the changerooms than a person with male genitalia that has no interest but is unfortunately sporting the wrong tackle. And I don't have to prove it; I can't be stuffed. Wink
Nup - as a juvenile girl you're four times more likely to harassed by a boy than a girl.

Not linking it - "can't be stuffed".
don_dunstan

"If you're too lazy or ignorant to work the mysterious interwebs then perhaps you can apply for a research assistant so you can effectively debunk my arguments without asking me to do it for you."
  don_dunstan The Ghost of George Stephenson

Location: Adelaide proud
The problem with Don, is similar to the Murdoch media where he gleans his 'information' from, which is how it has...not possibly has, but definitely has been reported in those tabloid papers the reality of a young person who is questioning their gender and how they learn, evolve and accept it to try to come to terms with it.

The prospect that Don relishes to support his feeble argument is that a young person would walk into the other genders toilets/shower block etc which so enrages him, is so unlikely as to be similar to the chances of being hit by a bolt of lightning.

The parents, school professionals including counsellor will have all got together long before Dons theory could ever be realised.
So, as Don raised this invalid issue, I call on him to, from a reputable news source get back to us with a link to a creditable story where this has ever occurred.

As you wrote this tripe in your outraged comments of this ridiculous scenario...it's now for you to prove it has actually occurred and harm was caused as a result of it.

Mike.
Mike. He knows it is not a problem that he makes it out to be. He is echoing what Mike Huckerbee has said and that man is an utter twat. The overwhelming evidence is that as regards to sex crimes against under aged girls, transgendered males or otherwise wandering into a public toilet is not the problem or the main source. He knows this. Its because it is a Biden/Harris initiative, because that man is an advocate for no one.


Michael
mejhammers1
Michael, you're the weakest of the lot. You turn to water and run away when I point out that Harris says white people can't possibly be underprivileged and don't need any help whatsoever.
  DirtyBallast Chief Commissioner

Location: I was here first. You're only visiting.
How entertaining is this thread tonight?

And Don is only half cut! Laughing
  mejhammers1 Chief Commissioner

How entertaining is this thread tonight?

And Don is only half cut! Laughing
DirtyBallast
And completely fact free too.  He cannot get around to the fact that most people are taking the pi$$.

Michael
  don_dunstan The Ghost of George Stephenson

Location: Adelaide proud
Evidence pertaining to what, pray tell? You're actually capable of refuting these things yourself you know. For the umpteenth time, it's an internet chat board, not a Phd thesis. I only reference things when I feel like it, not because someone demands it of me.
Bollocks.

Be a decent human, OWN your words, TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for what you say. If you want to be controversial that's fine, you are free to express your opinions, but they should at least be based on fact!
DirtyBallast
And yet...
And I don't have to prove it; I can't be stuffed.
DirtyBallast
So one rule for you and another one for me? And then there's this gem:
How entertaining is this thread tonight? And Don is only half cut!
DirtyBallast
I could be really, really drunk, stoned, flying on coke and Hunter Biden crystal meth'd off my face and still run rings around you. You dig holes, put yourselves in them and then bury yourselves all for me.
  DirtyBallast Chief Commissioner

Location: I was here first. You're only visiting.
Evidence pertaining to what, pray tell? You're actually capable of refuting these things yourself you know. For the umpteenth time, it's an internet chat board, not a Phd thesis. I only reference things when I feel like it, not because someone demands it of me.
Bollocks.

Be a decent human, OWN your words, TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for what you say. If you want to be controversial that's fine, you are free to express your opinions, but they should at least be based on fact!
And yet...
And I don't have to prove it; I can't be stuffed.
So one rule for you and another one for me? And then there's this gem:
How entertaining is this thread tonight? And Don is only half cut!
I could be really, really drunk, stoned, flying on coke and Hunter Biden crystal meth'd off my face and still run rings around you. You dig holes, put yourselves in them and then bury yourselves all for me.
don_dunstan
As if I need to point it out...well, maybe to you, but not to the rest of us...I borrowed YOUR line to poke fun at your hypocrisy. I played by YOUR rules and you criticised me for it!

Drunk, stoned, whatever. It all points to mental health issues. I know that you can't comprehend that decent people actually care for each other and the last thing we want to see here is a long term Railpage member taking extreme action. but please, PLEASE, seek help.

Sponsored advertisement

Display from: