Welcome to Biden Town

 
  wobert Chief Commissioner

Location: Half way between Propodolla and Kinimakatka
Fock me , an imbecile

Sponsored advertisement

  DirtyBallast Chief Commissioner

Location: I was here first. You're only visiting.
And your qualification for this statement is ? ? ?
I don't want to talk on a public forum about how I'm better qualified than you are to talk about sex-offenders, gender-identity issues, etc.
don_dunstan
Reading between the lines, it might mean that Don's involvement was nothing more than assisting police with their inquiries.

No doubt Don will now attack me for labelling him as a sexual predator. If so, that will be yet another example of how he gets it wrong most of the time. As we know, Don's comprehension skills are second to all.
  don_dunstan Dr Beeching

Location: Adelaide proud
And your qualification for this statement is ? ? ?
I don't want to talk on a public forum about how I'm better qualified than you are to talk about sex-offenders, gender-identity issues, etc.
Reading between the lines, it might mean that Don's involvement was nothing more than assisting police with their inquiries.

No doubt Don will now attack me for labelling him as a sexual predator. If so, that will be yet another example of how he gets it wrong most of the time. As we know, Don's comprehension skills are second to all.
DirtyBallast
Another one of my incontrovertible secret fans who just can't get enough of me even though they pretend to hate me and my truths because its fashionable.

It wouldn't matter what I said about myself you'd still say I was either:
  • Lying
  • Exaggerating
  • Pulling rank on you poor plebs who don't actually have the same experience that I have in working with sex offenders.
Nothing that I say will be the right answer. Nothing that I say will ever satiate you and the others. So why should I bother?

Anyway, welcome back to my fan club, I bet you missed me.
  mejhammers1 Chief Commissioner

Don In your total myopic delusion blame everything on one BLM supporter.  So you can single out one idiot BLM supporter who run up his mouth about breaking some windows threatening violence (utterly disgusting) But somehow you cannot see literally hundreds of MAGA Tw@ts, some who are Republican elected officials who were at the riot, literally wanting to kill so called opponents, all recorded on video. Do you realize how ridiculous that argument is? Does not allay for one instance your racial bias. You can cite the one idiot black man, but hey you can't see all those overwhelming white, MAGA tw@ts people storming the Capital. Says it all really.
Nah that's wrong, Michael, there were plenty of people there who were not anything to do with MAGA - they just wanted to make trouble. Right back at you: Do you realise how ridiculous your argument is? Those people were hard-core trouble-makers, most of them were not representative of Trump at all. It's like saying that all the BLM rioters were definitely Joe Biden supporters.
We are talking about Trump not Nixon. You really think that Trump is the same as Nixon. Kim Jong-Un is still a threat as he always was. Trump just gave the North Korean leader legitimacy.
Ridiculous, what a crock of shyte argument you put up there Michael - absolute crap. North Korea has been around almost as long as the Chinese Communist Party - they're nuclear armed, they're a clear and present danger to South Korea and Japan and the Chinese government (using them as a proxy) just love them to bits because of what they do. Economically supported, militarily supported.  And they're being used relentlessly by the CCP to intimidate and threaten the West. Trump managed to (temporarily) diffuse the situation by opening detente with them.

And you can't even bring yourself to give him credit for that. Because, Trump.

I have many demands on my time, Michael - not the least of which is the odd half-dozen people on this board who hang on my every word and cry into their gin if I don't get back to them and give their drab lives a little sunshine. If you're going to respond with absolute facile, rubbish arguments like "but Trump gave him legitimacy" then I won't even bother getting back to you any longer.
Yes they are biased, and something should be done about that. Because the ABC exists because of the Public Purse. However the ABC does not intentionally lie, like FOX News or Sky News does at that is the difference.

Source? I can find no story pertaining to the ABC giving the BLM supporter $2,500. Or is this another made up story pulled from your tukkas, Don?
We say A-R-S-E in this country, Michael - except that the Railpage filter will block it.

And that info was on Sky News (Vinelander will be along any minute now to say it's wrong because it's on Sky... but then won't be able to debunk it) but I'd encourage you to watch Andrew Bolt's video on why the ABC paid a man charged with a criminal offense for video on the Capitol Hill riot knowing full well that:
  • He'd already been charged with incitement to violence
  • He was part of the riot himself.
Non-disclosure from the ABC on HOW they obtained that video is nothing short of criminal.

"My ABC"? Nup. Not for a moment. Not for decades since its been well and truly captured by the radical left.
don_dunstan
I have many demands on my time, Michael - not the least of which is the odd half-dozen people on this board who hang on my every word and cry into their gin if I don't get back to them and give their drab lives a little sunshine. If you're going to respond with absolute facile, rubbish arguments like "but Trump gave him legitimacy" then I won't even bother getting back to you any longer.

Yep and you still cannot dispute the fact with any credibility that Trump had nothing to do with it. You know if Trump said nothing there is no riot. They may have been other people at the riot but If you can point to any evidence that they were a sizeable number comparable to butt-munching Trump sycophants, please provide some evidence.

And that info was on Sky News

And did they have sources on the ground or did they just listened to some old wrinkled GOP git belching lies?

Sky News and Andrew Bolt. The same Andrew Bolt who argued the Dems are costing lives because they are not promoting Hydroxychloroquine as cure for the Covid, the same Sky News that has twits on that still spout the same crap that the election was rigged and we have evidence.

Sky News, just a bunch of Angry old white dudes with a couple of token women thrown in the mix.

We say A-R-S-E in this country

I am surprised you did not also say And if you don't like it ...

Not for decades since its been well and truly captured by the radical left.

You cannot help arguing with yourself, Don. I have said I think that the ABC has a left wing bias, but if you think that Sky News is the Antidote, well...


Michael
  don_dunstan Dr Beeching

Location: Adelaide proud
And that info was on Sky News
mejhammers1
Was it wrong?

He actually showed the receipt where the ABC paid said BLM activist for their services.

Is it wrong?
  mejhammers1 Chief Commissioner

And that info was on Sky News
Was it wrong?

He actually showed the receipt where the ABC paid said BLM activist for their services.

Is it wrong?
don_dunstan
Got the footage of that?

Michael
  don_dunstan Dr Beeching

Location: Adelaide proud
And that info was on Sky News
Was it wrong?

He actually showed the receipt where the ABC paid said BLM activist for their services.

Is it wrong?
Got the footage of that?

Michael
mejhammers1
Michael, did you even watch the video you lazy bugger? Obviously not.
  don_dunstan Dr Beeching

Location: Adelaide proud
Wind turbines that AGL and others say are almost silent:



https://youtu.be/rOU39ws1gHo
  mejhammers1 Chief Commissioner

And that info was on Sky News
Was it wrong?

He actually showed the receipt where the ABC paid said BLM activist for their services.

Is it wrong?
Got the footage of that?

Michael
Michael, did you even watch the video you lazy bugger? Obviously not.
don_dunstan
Michael, did you even watch the video you lazy bugger? Obviously not.

Pathetic cop out, Don. Prove to me that the video even exists.

Michael
  The Vinelander Minister for Railways

Location: Ballan, Victoria on the Ballarat RFR Line
I'll ask you again because you seem keen to avoid the question: Is the ABC an accurate source of information a hundred percent of the time?

Because its a silly question Don, but ill humor you. No outlet is 100% accurate. The ABC however is not blatantly dishonest though. Like Fox.
The ABC is blatantly biased. They don't cover both sides of the climate change debate, they routinely condemned Trump with no evidence and attributed blame to Trump for the Capitol break-in.

They paid the BLM organiser $2,500 for his story; the same BLM organiser I've cited before who broke into the Capitol Building, smashed a window, threatened people and said he had a knife and urged the mob to "burn this sh*t down". And yet they (like you) still have the temerity to say that it was a right-wing Trump-led riot.

Lies. And the problem that I have with it is that (unlike Sky) I'm paying for this rubbish through my taxes and my opinion is definitely NOT represented there. It should either be pay-for-view (like Boris is doing to the BBC) or completely privatised, sold off to another one of the commercial channels.

It's called DIPLOMACY, Michael. It's a complicated concept that you should try getting your head around sometime.

Yeah course it is when its your man. And if it was Biden. We all know how you would react. His sickening fawning to Putin, Kim Jong_un, Xi Jinping (till the Trade War) and Modi, all who have used disgusting tactics to suppress minorities, is pathetic. Yeah throwing the FBI under the Bus to brown nose Putin, yeah real diplomacy that.
That's what diplomacy is, Michael - you bring your enemy into the tent rather than have him outside the tent. You still don't seem to grasp what the fundamentals of good diplomacy actually is - I'd encourage you to read up about what Nixon did with Mao in 1972 where his intention to wedge the Soviet Union was a brilliant ploy.

Trump was doing the same thing with Kim when he walked across the border and met him - but for some reason that wasn't considered to be an excellent wedge against the CCP (because, Trump).

And anyway, isn't Biden doing exactly what you detested about Trump? Except that he's not doing it very well.


You've repeatedly described a few deranged people posing as Trump supporters as an attempted coup. Hysterical much?

From a Man who loses it over Transgenders. No, it was not just a few. Posing as Trump supporters? Yeah Delusional much. Tell that to the Congress People that were threatened. Hell Mike Pence is in hiding. Someone needs to kick that Guide Dog of yours Don. And here you are criticizing others of bias.
I'm not 'hysterical about transgenders' - I'm worried that they rushed this legislation through without thinking about the potential for sex offenders to abuse it. Big difference.

And Mike Pence isn't 'in hiding', how ridiculous. He made a public statement about Rush Limbaugh's death only the other day.
Don In your total myopic delusion blame everything on one BLM supporter.  So you can single out one idiot BLM supporter who run up his mouth about breaking some windows threatening violence (utterly disgusting) But somehow you cannot see literally hundreds of MAGA Tw@ts, some who are Republican elected officials who were at the riot, literally wanting to kill so called opponents, all recorded on video. Do you realize how ridiculous that argument is? Does not allay for one instance your racial bias. You can cite the one idiot black man, but hey you can't see all those overwhelming white, MAGA tw@ts people storming the Capital. Says it all really.

Nixon did with Mao in 1972 where his intention to wedge the Soviet Union was a brilliant ploy.

We are talking about Trump not Nixon. You really think that Trump is the same as Nixon. Kim Jong-Un is still a threat as he always was. Trump just gave the North Korean leader legitimacy.

And anyway, isn't Biden doing exactly what you detested about Trump? Except that he's not doing it very well.

Didn't I say that Biden has a flawed foreign policy. Didn't I say that the U-Turn undertaken was disgraceful. The difference is that I criticise Biden when he stuffs up, you think always that Trump is the dog dangly bits, that's the difference.

The ABC is blatantly biased. They don't cover both sides of the climate change debate,

Yes they are biased, and something should be done about that. Because the ABC exists because of the Public Purse. However the ABC does not intentionally lie, like FOX News or Sky News does at that is the difference.

They paid the BLM organiser $2,500 for his story;

Source? I can find no story pertaining to the ABC giving the BLM supporter $2,500. Or is this another made up story pulled from your tukkas, Don?

They routinely condemned Trump with no evidence and attributed blame to Trump for the Capitol break-in.

Trump literally gave a speech to those idiots telling them to march on the capitol. Some were armed to the teeth. What do you think was going to happen? And he stood there and watched whilst the events were unfolding. Some of the marchers even said they where following the orders of Trump who incited the march. And here you are saying that Biden could have called off demonstrations against Trump. You are a massive hypocrite, Don.

Ill give you credit where credit is due. You are supremely confident in your own BS. Loads of words, but essentially got nothing.

Michael
mejhammers1

I couldn't agree more. Moreover, I said a few days ago the representative from SA would find ways to blame President Biden for the Trump supported Capitol Hill riots.

Also the ABC does not...I'll repeat it so there can be no doubt whatsoever. The ABC does NOT engage in chequebook journalism.

http://about.abc.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/GNChequebookJournalismINS.pdf

And for the few flat earthers still out there, there are no 'both sides' to the climate change debate, because the deniers, given air by the far right media in feeble attempts to pander to the views and prejudices of their far right thinking audience need to understand the science is in. There's no debate to be had. And NO I'm not posting sources for the bleeding obvious Exclamation

The representative from SA is simply grasping for straws, by again conveniently omitting sources. Because when one sings from the same songbook as the far right 'fake news' media. He's so accustomed to the cra@p espoused from that discredited section of the media that he thinks he can lie like they do without consequence and get away with it.


Mike.
  RTT_Rules Oliver Bullied, CME

Location: Dubai UAE
Wind turbines that AGL and others say are almost silent:



https://youtu.be/rOU39ws1gHo
don_dunstan
The video is from alongside the wind turbine, so yes I'd expect there to be some noise.

However,
Turbines are audible from distances as great as 2 km only in ideal conditions; when there is very little wind where the listener is, but sufficient wind where the turbines are on a ridge-top to power them. If there is a car on a road within about 2 km you will not hear the turbines because of the noise from the car.
https://ramblingsdc.net/wtnoise.html

At this distance, a wind turbine will emit noise levels of 43 decibels, which is less than the noise produced by the average air conditioner (50 decibels) while most refrigerators emit noise of around 40 decibels. This noise level falls to 38 decibels at a distance of 500 meters.
https://interestingengineering.com/wind-turbine-noise-fact-or-fiction

Having driven past (alongside) wind turbines in Germany and NSW, we stopped basically next to them and I could not hear them due to both road noise in Germany as it was a 6 lane highway and in NSW due to wind noise across my ears.

I've also driven past wind turbines in other locations but would say they are a few km away and no way you'd hear them.

From searching various sites I've found comments that most turbines are between 45dB and 55dB which is is a level where if standing alongside you don't need to raise your. AC is around 40dB and fridge around 35dB.

A car is around 80dB on a highway. Where we live in Dubai is 200m from a main road that 8 years ago was only 4 lanes and saw a few cars an hour. Its now 6 lanes and very busy and the noise levels are on the edge of stressful at certain times of the time in winter when the windows are open, especially if the hoons are out.

An interesting study in Scotland found that those farmers who had wind turbines on their own property and generated an significant income ($about $20kpa each turbine), had no noise or noise related stress levels, but farmers along side or further away did.

Summary, I'm sure that wind turbines in the past were noiser than ones of today which are not noise less, but far from the usual claims that propagate the internet and I'd dare so most people living more then 500m from the nearest turbine would not even notice it above other background noises including the wind. Also note the the turbine noise would increase with the wind speed but so would other wind related noises. Personally I'd rather live 500m away from a wind turbine than 500m away from a major highway any day of the week.


 
  The Vinelander Minister for Railways

Location: Ballan, Victoria on the Ballarat RFR Line
Thanks Shane. Near Ballan are three windfarms:

https://www.google.com/search?q=ballan+wind+farm&oq=ballan+wind+farmn&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0i13j0i22i30i457.6284j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Well over 100, enormous graceful towers, doing lots of good work (yes I too can add my personal opinion like some others, only my opinion is totally positive).

Strangely enough when I ride by on my bike there aren't piles of dead birds around the towers...funny that.

We have a fog this morning so it's probably true the blades are not currently turning, however the fog will soon lift and I was told on a public tour the blades turn and generate electricity when there is a breeze as low as 8Km/h.

Mike.
  DirtyBallast Chief Commissioner

Location: I was here first. You're only visiting.
And your qualification for this statement is ? ? ?
I don't want to talk on a public forum about how I'm better qualified than you are to talk about sex-offenders, gender-identity issues, etc.
Reading between the lines, it might mean that Don's involvement was nothing more than assisting police with their inquiries.

No doubt Don will now attack me for labelling him as a sexual predator. If so, that will be yet another example of how he gets it wrong most of the time. As we know, Don's comprehension skills are second to all.
It wouldn't matter what I said about myself you'd still say I was either:
  • Lying
  • Exaggerating
don_dunstan
There's a reason for that.
  don_dunstan Dr Beeching

Location: Adelaide proud
Michael, did you even watch the video you lazy bugger? Obviously not.
Pathetic cop out, Don. Prove to me that the video even exists.

Michael
mejhammers1
Michael, out of all the hysterical, narrow-minded people on this board I was prepared to credit you (and you alone) with having half a brain. That BLM activist got paid from multiple news organisations for his footage - Australia's ABC wasn't the only one, it was well worth his participating in that thing despite getting charged. Perhaps that was his whole idea.

Anyway if you can't be bothered arguing properly then I'm going to put you into the 'childish' basket with the other infants on this board.
  don_dunstan Dr Beeching

Location: Adelaide proud
An interesting study in Scotland found that those farmers who had wind turbines on their own property and generated an significant income ($about $20kpa each turbine), had no noise or noise related stress levels, but farmers along side or further away did.
RTT_Rules
Well, duh. They're getting paid, of course they're not going to complain.

Why find a study in Scotland, there's been research done in Australia: A Flinders University study found that wind farm noise travels an awfully long way - Fairfax (2020):

Results from ongoing Flinders University research into turbine noise and sleep found that low-frequency pulsing from a South Australian wind farm was audible about 16 per cent of the time inside homes up to 3.5 kilometres from a turbine, including 22 per cent of the time at night. The noise was audible 24 per cent of the time outside the homes.

Recordings detected what complainants commonly describe as a pulsating, thumping or rumbling sound. The noise is technically known as amplitude modulation, and relates to a change in noise level that occurs approximately once per second as the turbine blade rotates.

But they're only farmers and country folk so they don't matter - right?

Anyway high time we opened another thread devoted to rubbish renewables - this one is supposedly about Mister Magoo's Amazing Adventure.
  Valvegear Oliver Bullied, CME

Location: Richmond Vic
I ask the question again, but now it's wind farms; what the hell have they got to do with Biden?
  mejhammers1 Chief Commissioner

@don_dunstan. I see you have reverted to type. Not provided a shred of evidence except alleged proof from Andrew Bolt, a known cynical racist liar. Now, who does that remind you of?

Yeah I am narrow minded and childish. Well whatever floats your boat. Engaging in the very behaviour you were going to report me for.

Such a pathetic snowflake.


Michael
  don_dunstan Dr Beeching

Location: Adelaide proud
@don_dunstan. I see you have reverted to type. Not provided a shred of evidence except alleged proof from Andrew Bolt, a known cynical racist liar. Now, who does that remind you of?

Yeah I am narrow minded and childish. Well whatever floats your boat. Engaging in the very behaviour you were going to report me for.

Such a pathetic snowflake.


Micha
mejhammers1
You refused to watch the video attached to the link, Michael - in that case I can't help your self-imposed ignorance.
  mejhammers1 Chief Commissioner

@don_dunstan. That's your proof? Never came across someone who says so much, and it means so little.

I was looking for actual evidence like a clear photograph of the remittance or an actual credible source. Not some angry old white dude spouting crap. A guy who had his rear handed to him by the Courts for spreading lies about our Indigenous Brothers and Sisters. So just because Andrew Bolt said it, without a shred of evidence, it must be true? Because the remittance paper could have been about anything, it was so blurry.

Yes CNN had interviewed this creature and they are wrong. Lock up the stupid git. Funny how though the one black man is the culprit, but all those mainly white people, many of them white supremists, are somehow blameless and that the right weren't involved.

Man you can do better than that. Or maybe you can't. Anyway, that's akin to Kayleigh MacNaziBarbie holding up empty ring binders as proof of electoral fraud committed by Joe Biden and the Democrats.  

Then again you would believe anything as long as its from Angry old white dudes at Sky or Fox.

After all, Birds of a feather flock together.

Pathetic.


Michael
  don_dunstan Dr Beeching

Location: Adelaide proud
@don_dunstan. That's your proof? Never came across someone who says so much, and it means so little.

I was looking for actual evidence like a clear photograph of the remittance or an actual credible source. Not some angry old white dude spouting crap. A guy who had his rear handed to him by the Courts for spreading lies about our Indigenous Brothers and Sisters. So just because Andrew Bolt said it, without a shred of evidence, it must be true? Because the remittance paper could have been about anything, it was so blurry.

Yes CNN had interviewed this creature and they are wrong. Lock up the stupid git. Funny how though the one black man is the culprit, but all those mainly white people, many of them white supremists, are somehow blameless and that the right weren't involved.

Man you can do better than that. Or maybe you can't. Anyway, that's akin to Kayleigh MacNaziBarbie holding up empty ring binders as proof of electoral fraud committed by Joe Biden and the Democrats.  

Then again you would believe anything as long as its from Angry old white dudes at Sky or Fox.

After all, Birds of a feather flock together.

Pathetic.


Michael
mejhammers1
John Sullivan was definitely paid $70,000 by both CNN and NBC for his footage of the Capitol Building riots: Washington Times

He was interviewed by CNN’s Anderson Cooper not as a perpetrator but as an eye-witness. On Jan. 6, the day of the riot by “Stop the Steal” Trump supporters, Mr. Sullivan and CNN signed a $35,000  contract to broadcast his video. Two weeks later, NBC News also ponied up $35,000.

Mr. Sullivan captured Ashli Babbitt’s death as she attempted to crash through a door window leading to the Speaker’s lobby and was shot by a U.S. Capitol Police officer. Scores of invaders documented their incursions on cell phone videos posted on various Internet platforms. Defense attorney Steven R. Kiersh filed the CNN and NBC invoices in U.S. District Court to bolster Mr. Sullivan’s claim that he was a “documentarian” that day recording history. Mr. Kiersh said Mr. Sullivan’s group, Insurgence USA, is his employment.

Here is a better image of the payment record that Australia's ABC made to John Sullivan:

  billybaxter Chief Commissioner

Location: Bosnia Park, Fairfield
Other than Don and the Q-Anon people, does anybody else refer to President Biden as 'Magoo'? The use of it is as pathetic, revealing and demeaning to the speaker as all of those ridiculous 'Orange Man' comments made about the previous President while he was just trying to get on with his job.
  mejhammers1 Chief Commissioner

@don_dunstan Oh I can admit I am wrong, its a pity someone I know cannot. Evidence, yeah whatever. Your evidence because that is all that counts isn't it Don. A pity it is all bluster and sweet f.a. You've got nothing as per usual.

So now Don as the thread has been locked, just tell me in your own words and take your time, just tell me what did I say to threaten your person? And if you can prove it I will unashamedly apologise.

Because as far as I am concerned, calling someone a racist is not a slur if its true.

Which it is in your case.


Michael
  don_dunstan Dr Beeching

Location: Adelaide proud
@don_dunstan Oh I can admit I am wrong, its a pity someone I know cannot.
mejhammers1
What are you talking about, I just told Dirty Ballast that I wrongly estimated the price of secondhand BMW's by ten grand. Critically important, earth-shattering stuff.

And (I repeat) I didn't go running off to David Head about your nasty personal message - what more do you want, Michael?
  mejhammers1 Chief Commissioner

@don_dunstan If you think that that is the only thing you have been wrong about, well what more can I say.

And (I repeat) I didn't go running off to David Head about your nasty personal message.

Did not say you did, merely that you had threatened to. As my statement states quite clearly,

"The Donster has threatened to report me to the Moderators."

Now its nasty instead of threatening. The message is subject to more downgrades than a Cyclone.

So you were right about ABC, Congratulations. Even so it still does not hide the blatant racial bias that the right wing have by singling out a stupid black BLM protestor and ignoring all those Trumptards (mainly white) armed to the teeth and trying to blame leftists with absolutely no evidence. Angela Rye was right, according to Trump, Law and Order applies to everyone, except white people.

You cannot even tell me the threatening/nasty message that I was supposed to have sent ? I already said I will apologise if I have. So come on tell me. Or are you one that can dish it out but cannot take the mildest of insults? Yeah maybe Angry old white dude and racist is hard, but it is a pretty apt description of you.


Michael
  mejhammers1 Chief Commissioner

Other than Don and the Q-Anon people, does anybody else refer to President Biden as 'Magoo'? The use of it is as pathetic, revealing and demeaning to the speaker as all of those ridiculous 'Orange Man' comments made about the previous President while he was just trying to get on with his job.
billybaxter
Billy. Mr. Trump's cabinet when he first started was a competent one. He had people like Kelly and Haley (don't like her but she was competent) and Bolton. But he did not like someone who would steer him from making stupid and reckless judgements and replaced them with absolute butt munching imbeciles who fed his fragile ego, and that is an action of a dictator.

This is a man who agreed with a Doctored post from Britain First, a racist organisation, who told 4 women who dare criticise his work as President by telling them to leave the US, even though 3 of the 4 of were born there. Not to mention his appalling handling of the Covid crisis. He has insulted mainly black female reporters, it is lucky that he got away with just Orange Man.


Michael

Sponsored advertisement

Display from: