On top of those G class, QUBE also have several VL class on lease from Rail First Asset Management, including VL353, VL356, VL357 and VL360. There is also talk of at least one more VL class being gauge converted to broad gauge for QUBE's useTwo more last I heard, VL351 was transferred from Adelaide by SCT the other day, and there should be VL352 coming too.
Where exactly will SCT be operating steel services?
Wow, didn't know SCT were getting more CSRs, they must be better than the SCTs if there going in this direction for new locos.Unless one has 'good big wheel locos' to burn on SG putting anything other than 'capable rubbish' on the BG Long Island is a waste.
I was just thinking last night that I haven't heard about S303 in a while.
Is it planned to use the VLs or Gs on the Long Island?
Great to see more VLs on BG, they all should be home.
Sim
Thanks A6ET most informative. Brings back some vague memories!Despite having re-read this thread I admit that there are some aspects that are not clear (to me anyway).Going back in time, when the out of gauge flat steel products were placed generally on older MLE for transport to Long Island, problem with that working was that it was a slow trip, with running times reduced as well as the aspect that any up train had to be put away, or the Out of gauge train put away to allow for Down trains to run through them, at reduced speed. The other issue was that these trains worked in the main from PTK to Enfield and then to the main south, a longer and slower journey.
Seems clear that the Port Kembla - Long Island coil traffic can be 100% handled on container flats of one sort or another on both SG and BG legs.
How is the 'in gauge' and 'wide plate' traffic to be handled between Port Kembla and Melbourne? These are traditionally handled on bolstered flat flats and tilt beds, respectively? Does Qube have access to suitable flat flats and more particularly tilt beds? Both groups were inherited by PN from NR.
Is there any RSJ* or other steel product ex Port Kembla that will require the use of open wagons? I have seen some on various videos but they may well have been very old.
Will Qube utilise expensive/new front line container flats on the BG Long Island leg to replace the largely rubbish cut downs inherited by PN from NR on this section?
Has PN sold, leased or otherwise transferred any rolling stock to Qube?
Time will tell I guess.
* Rolled steel joists
I cannot remember the changing date and when the various MLE type flat wagons (could well have been other flats though, and of newer types) were converted and tests performed on them speed wise. The cradles were generally at 45degrees, and chained over the top and fastened on both sides at the bottom of the cradles. The benefit was multi, as the angle of the cradles, allowed for them being well balanced and speed was able to be increased to IIRC to 6omph, there were still speed conditions on them.
The other benefit that also worked in with the increase of speed, was that no more did they go via Enfield (unless an issue and extra wagons that were not allowed on the Dombarton - Moss Vale line) but they were primarily running on the mountain, and that meant better transit times.
I believe there must be some of the cradle wagons in use on some services as I have seen the tilted steel on some NCL trains, along the Hunter line between Telerah & BMD, also and its been a while I have been on Central Coast services and seen some trains in the Gosford an Cowan loops. That is a small sample these days.
One other aspect in the old out of gauge loads was the aspect that every station had to be manned by ASM/SM or signalman when they ran, the train had to reduce speed through the station areas, along the whole length of the platform. When the train was clear of the platform there had to be a green light from the Guard to the driver/or fireman depending on the side that was visible for the hand signal.
From memory, Binalong was somewhat a problem and speed had to be reduced to a very slow speed owing to the curvature of the platform on the down side. Guard and SM/ASM/Signalman had to exchange the green hand signal as the train passed. It was also a location where they were put away to allow faster trains to run through them.
Can I ask a couple of questions about the PN SG coil trains from Port Kembla to Melbourne which are about to be superseded? I have long ago lost touch with their detailed operation.
Assuming that the entire consist is container flats of one sort or another:Just curious before the service passes into history
- Are they all Y types which are permitted ~ 110km/h?
- Are these trains tabled at ~110 km/h?
- Do they actually run at around 100/110 km/h in practice?
- Will their container flats be available to increase PN's intermodal services?
One more PN WM train tabled, NR and LDP on Friday I think.Can I ask a couple of questions about the PN SG coil trains from Port Kembla to Melbourne which are about to be superseded? I have long ago lost touch with their detailed operation.
Assuming that the entire consist is container flats of one sort or another:Just curious before the service passes into history
- Are they all Y types which are permitted ~ 110km/h?
- Are these trains tabled at ~110 km/h?
- Do they actually run at around 100/110 km/h in practice?
- Will their container flats be available to increase PN's intermodal services?
No.
No.
No.
Possibly. Some were stowed at Seymour today but their fate is unknown.
AFAIK the last WM train ran yesterday. The WM/MW trains were all 80 km/hr trains. The speed of loaded trains was reduced to 70 km/hr for some time between the Border and Violet Town due to track condition. Many of us are waiting to see how Qube will go with their planned 100km/hr running.
Thanks Fatty.Can I ask a couple of questions about the PN SG coil trains from Port Kembla to Melbourne which are about to be superseded? I have long ago lost touch with their detailed operation.
Assuming that the entire consist is container flats of one sort or another:Just curious before the service passes into history
- Are they all Y types which are permitted ~ 110km/h?
- Are these trains tabled at ~110 km/h?
- Do they actually run at around 100/110 km/h in practice?
- Will their container flats be available to increase PN's intermodal services?
No.
No.
No.
Possibly. Some were stowed at Seymour today but their fate is unknown.
AFAIK the last WM train ran yesterday. The WM/MW trains were all 80 km/hr trains. The speed of loaded trains was reduced to 70 km/hr for some time between the Border and Violet Town due to track condition. Many of us are waiting to see how Qube will go with their planned 100km/hr running.
I was acting as a chargman at Delec from 73 - 76, both in the Zona and inside for engine control along with Main line rostering that was usually to do with loco rostering depending on trains and their working through Enfield. I have a book that is somewhere that included the engines in the depot/paddock and on rostered working, as such the OOG trains would run depending on the amount of other trains in the same period, and they could and would often come from PTK and stow at Enfield until paths were available. Often the line that ran to where the blue metal was dumped near north box, with locos' also up front. if that siding was full then the train would go to the Enf north middle road and back into the DD's section which were cleared of any wagons that may have been too close to them on both sides, as the trains were heavy it also meant they were short.Thanks A6ET most informative. Brings back some vague memories!Despite having re-read this thread I admit that there are some aspects that are not clear (to me anyway).Going back in time, when the out of gauge flat steel products were placed generally on older MLE for transport to Long Island, problem with that working was that it was a slow trip, with running times reduced as well as the aspect that any up train had to be put away, or the Out of gauge train put away to allow for Down trains to run through them, at reduced speed. The other issue was that these trains worked in the main from PTK to Enfield and then to the main south, a longer and slower journey.
Seems clear that the Port Kembla - Long Island coil traffic can be 100% handled on container flats of one sort or another on both SG and BG legs.
How is the 'in gauge' and 'wide plate' traffic to be handled between Port Kembla and Melbourne? These are traditionally handled on bolstered flat flats and tilt beds, respectively? Does Qube have access to suitable flat flats and more particularly tilt beds? Both groups were inherited by PN from NR.
Is there any RSJ* or other steel product ex Port Kembla that will require the use of open wagons? I have seen some on various videos but they may well have been very old.
Will Qube utilise expensive/new front line container flats on the BG Long Island leg to replace the largely rubbish cut downs inherited by PN from NR on this section?
Has PN sold, leased or otherwise transferred any rolling stock to Qube?
Time will tell I guess.
* Rolled steel joists
I cannot remember the changing date and when the various MLE type flat wagons (could well have been other flats though, and of newer types) were converted and tests performed on them speed wise. The cradles were generally at 45degrees, and chained over the top and fastened on both sides at the bottom of the cradles. The benefit was multi, as the angle of the cradles, allowed for them being well balanced and speed was able to be increased to IIRC to 6omph, there were still speed conditions on them.
The other benefit that also worked in with the increase of speed, was that no more did they go via Enfield (unless an issue and extra wagons that were not allowed on the Dombarton - Moss Vale line) but they were primarily running on the mountain, and that meant better transit times.
I believe there must be some of the cradle wagons in use on some services as I have seen the tilted steel on some NCL trains, along the Hunter line between Telerah & BMD, also and its been a while I have been on Central Coast services and seen some trains in the Gosford an Cowan loops. That is a small sample these days.
One other aspect in the old out of gauge loads was the aspect that every station had to be manned by ASM/SM or signalman when they ran, the train had to reduce speed through the station areas, along the whole length of the platform. When the train was clear of the platform there had to be a green light from the Guard to the driver/or fireman depending on the side that was visible for the hand signal.
From memory, Binalong was somewhat a problem and speed had to be reduced to a very slow speed owing to the curvature of the platform on the down side. Guard and SM/ASM/Signalman had to exchange the green hand signal as the train passed. It was also a location where they were put away to allow faster trains to run through them.
IIRC these OoG/wide plate trains usually used to depart Kembla on a Friday night when, I assume, there was a well known OoG path.
I recall the (13?) MLE flats which became NKSX and ultimately 11 were taken over by National Rail as RKSX soon to be dumped as the new tilt beds arrived.
As X types, in my day everything X was restricted to 80 km/h not that it matters for this exercise.
I have checked the WTT's 1964, 1965, 1968, also 1980, cannot find the Illawarra GA, but could be packed still. There is no references to any OOG trains in them, the routine goods services, with exception of the Milk train from Bomaderry, M-Saturday,ran through from the gong arriving DHarbour 1832. That was the only afternoon scheduled goods train on Saturday, similar times to weekdays.I was acting as a chargman at Delec from 73 - 76, both in the Zona and inside for engine control along with Main line rostering that was usually to do with loco rostering depending on trains and their working through Enfield. I have a book that is somewhere that included the engines in the depot/paddock and on rostered working, as such the OOG trains would run depending on the amount of other trains in the same period, and they could and would often come from PTK and stow at Enfield until paths were available. Often the line that ran to where the blue metal was dumped near north box, with locos' also up front. if that siding was full then the train would go to the Enf north middle road and back into the DD's section which were cleared of any wagons that may have been too close to them on both sides, as the trains were heavy it also meant they were short.
If general freights ran, and a relative busy program was on, the OOG trains would be held until a quieter period turned up. The running of trains ex PTK via Enfield on a Friday night would usually be after the 4 primary afternoon trains that ran with loadings for the Northern line, IIRC, & will need to check my Illa TT, on it, there was a gap between around 2000, until one that ran a bit later that was a train set for the Chullora Industrial area.
Saturday evening was the main time that the OOG trains ran as usually it was much quieter for down trains, certainly when the Enfield traffic was in use they in general departed Enfield when no nigh pax trains had gone, likewise with any other Interstate freight being pyritized.
I ended up at PTK from 78-82 as a driver there, and by then a reasonable number of the OOG trains were able to run up the mountain which eliminated the other problems, by then though the same trains ran as per when I was in the chargeman's were generally finished and the mountain the prefered route, but the other factor that came in was that they required an extra loco as far as Summit Tank and often it went through to Robertson also to MV &/or Goulburn.
I will check some of my notes from the Delec days, also PTK, especially with the WTT as I have lost my note book of the time at the Port.
I'm guessing that means the SCT Steel will run in and out of North Dynon, is that correct?Will be interesting to see, does the East-West loading currently get transhipped at Dynon or does it run right through from PTK?
North Dynon will be the transfer hub, with Qube bringing S/G loading in from Port Kembla, which will be transferred either to SCT, Laverton by SCT, via a Transfer Service, then on their MP9 Services heading West or if the loading needs to goto Hastings (Long Island), it will be transferred by Qube on B/G, then returned to North Dynon, and transferred as required.I'm guessing that means the SCT Steel will run in and out of North Dynon, is that correct?Will be interesting to see, I presume that this will be the case as there has been a heap of work going on at the North side of ND yard (adjacent to South Kensington station) with a large concrete hardstand, new sheds, boom gates and a site office installed for road access to said hard stand, lots of track work etc etc etc
This work has been going on for months but more recently there has been the odd steel wagon and a couple of donuts spotted there, I assume for testing purposes.
The last time I went past was Friday last week I think and it looked like the facility was pretty much ready to rock