Comments like that are a worry. Are you wearing your brown shirt and practicing the goose step too.That's your second Godwin, I let you off with your first, but now you lose.![]()
Syria has a right to attack "Israel" for it interfering with their nasty beak.Syria will NEVER (well unless they completely abandon anything that resembles common sense) attack Israel. It's pretty straight forward, Syria remembers June 1967, and they know the same thing will happen.
Comments like that are a worry. Are you wearing your brown shirt and practicing the goose step too.![]()
Syria will NEVER (well unless they completely abandon anything that resembles common sense) attack Israel. It's pretty straight forward, Syria remembers June 1967, and they know the same thing will happen.I didn't say they will, just that they have a right to, after "Israel" involved itself.
That's your second Godwin, I let you off with your first, but now you lose.
AaronSo don't get satire at all do you my precious petal? I'll explain it because clearly you don't get it. It's a not a link between Rudd and the Nazi party, it's a link between the popular catch phrase of Sgt Shultz who used the line 'I know nothing' to cover his smeg when things happened that were his responsibility to report.... I am sorry that I've stooped to this level...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/frontpage-nazi-slur-against-pm-kevin-rudd-puts-rupert-murdoch-centre-stage-in-australian-election-8752968.html
Rosebud![]()
So don't get satire at all do you my precious petal? I'll explain it because clearly you don't get it. It's a not a link between Rudd and the Nazi party, it's a link between the popular catch phrase of Sgt Shultz who used the line 'I know nothing' to cover his smeg when things happened that were his responsibility to report...
You are the worry, incapable of separating humour from fact. And apart from that, totally boring by bringing up the Nazi card at the drop of a hat. Grow up.
If on the other hand you are trying your best to insult me, you will have to do far better than that, I have been insulted by experts, and you are not even vaguely in their class. And they do not have to invoke Godwin's Law to make a point. All of which makes you very predictable.
Just continuing that tasteful humour but sorry that you were offended.
Surely you can do better than joking about shooting politicians you don't like. Seems enough wackos out there all too willing to oblige.
http://www.giffordsforcongress.com/
OK you went to uni and watched Hogans Heros. For anyone who didn'tWow! Being correct twice in one post, careful people might begin to think you've changed.![]()
I'm sure if they ran the same with Abbott you'd be the first to lecture us about satire.Oops! No, there it is, your normal broadcasting has resumed, thank god, I thought we'd lost you there.
If an American missile goes anywhere near the Russian Navy bases in Syria, expect a quick response in return. i.e. A few missiles into US warships and WWIII.And from news reports Obama IS ready to attack Syria. Gee I thought Obama was better than George "War" Bush jnr. Leave THEIR conflict alone to SORT IT OUT THEMSELVES. Only if they attack the US should the US then get involved.
The Yanks would be absolutely mad to get involved in Syria. Seriously, utterly, totally bonkers.
Re: Russia's air force.
The French have more planes and the Dutch have more flying hours. This isn't the Radio Moscow and "This is Deutsche Welle from Bonn" era.
Doesn't the US ever learn? It looks like it may put it's interfering beak alone to attack Syria.The problem is when a country uses Chemical Weapons on its own people (if they have), its the duty of the UN to get involved. The UN's predessor (name escapes me) that was born after WW1 was in part brought about due to the heavy use of chemical weapons in the western front. Its ok to shoot, blow and mame people, but gasing them to death was a hard line they didn't want to cross again.
I live currently in the middle east, the only way these guys can survive without fighting is strong hardline leadership. The benovalant royal rules of the GCC states is keeping them mostly stable apart from Bahrain. Jordon remembers Syria well and enjoys an economy much more affluent that if left alone should it retreat from its support of Israel and the USA, hence they are happy. But the non Royal leadership middle east countries are not doing so well and need again strong leadership/dictatorship as they are not ready for deomocracy. Islam is a very dictating/less flexible religon and I think this relfects what sort of governance they need.Absolutely, you have hit the nail on the head, and it is well illustrated that after the US invaded Iraq and Hussein was ousted, the country fell apart. He may have been a murderous prick, but he kept the country together.
The UN's predessor (name escapes me)The League of Nations (LN / SDN), 28 June 1919 - 20 April 1946, headquarters in Geneva.
the only way these guys can survive without fighting is strong hardline leadershipAnd the only way they can survive without being attacked in one way or another is to have a government that is "on board" with the US. Most of the strong hardline leaders are also Anglo-American puppets / clients / otherwise "on board", including the Arab monarchies.
...after the US invaded Iraq and Hussein was ousted, the country fell apart. He may have been a murderous prick, but he kept the country together.
We've disabled Quick Reply for this thread as it was last updated more than six months ago.