I haven't had time to carefully read the Prospectus yet, but it certainly seems as though this a change forced by the VGR's successes to date. Good to see!Valvegear (and others) it is true that the railway's success has led to this change but that is really only half the story.
I hope I'm around for long enough to see the A2 steam into Maldon.Me too but it might be considered too heavy for the condition of the line these days like the T class (although a full track re-build seems to be the plan) and it would have to run Tender first one way as it wouldn't fit on the 53 footer at Maldon (the CME table on the other hand easily accommodates it for turning when it runs MEL > CME trips).
I hope I'm around for long enough to see the A2 steam into Maldon.I don't think you will be; track quality isn't preventing that particular event from occurring. Rather, a much more expensive piece of infrastructure would need to be replaced to enable that to happen...
Getting away from fantasy NR Overland diversions via Maldon and back to VGR matters, another update to the VGR Mechanical blog this week shows more work on Y133.
https://vgrmechanical.wordpress.com/
A great job by the youngsters from the VGR's Young Volunteers Group.
Looks like the Civil boys have been busy as well, I am not sure if the references to increased speeds are related to the Service Re-orientation plan or just a co-incidence
https://vgrcivil.wordpress.com/
BG
Reading the mechanical report indicates that Y133 is no owned by VGR, is this true? Would be good if it is, a Y class really suits their operations and always seemed missing in there loco pool requirements.
Sim
Y133 is in fact owned by VicTrack HeritageReading the mechanical report indicates that Y133 is no owned by VGR, is this true? Would be good if it is, a Y class really suits their operations and always seemed missing in there loco pool requirements.
Sim
So very very happy for the railway.All covered in this document accessible from the vgr homepage
What is likely to mean in terms of operational changes?
I note that over the weekend, the Federal Government announced the 3rd Round of Building Better Regions Fund (BBRF) grants, including $995,000 towards a $2 million project to upgrade the VGR to run 3 return trips a day between Castlemaine and Maldon. Details here - https://www.business.gov.au/Assistance/Building-Better-Regions-Fund/Building-Better-Regions-Fund-Infrastructure-Projects/IP-funding-offers-round-3
I note from the blog updates I get that they're installing a lot of 80lb rail in place of the 60lb. This I assume is repurposed surplus from the suburban network donated by whom ever at either Metro and/or Victrack.Most if not all of the 80 Pound came from Bandiana years ago, it was donated to the VGR but cost a small fortune to lift and transport back to Muckleford. It is gradually being rolled out to improve the track quality and ride.
Happy to be corrected, as I'm just assuming since it doesn't look new.
Of more curiosity to me is their install of concrete sleepers. Their last blog IIRC mentions 100 out of 125 they have to be installed. Does anyone know whether VGR has had to purchase these or, if like the 80lb rail, they're donated??
Either way, they seem to be extremely pro active in using heavier rail as they get it, and using concrete as a longevity measure which also happens to be more sustainable. Unsure of the cost difference between the two, but I'm sure I've seen that figure somewhere?
Regards
We've disabled Quick Reply for this thread as it was last updated more than six months ago.