So what you are saying you overestimate problems and I under estimate them.
Nope, as a scientist you are using 2+2 = 3 to play to your political agenda which on this topic you have been doing for sometime.
What I'm saying is that a scientist is a scientist is a scientist.Nope, as a Scientist you are using 2+2 = 5 to play your political agenda which on this topic you have been doing for sometime.
I am of the belief that scientists are believable full stop. It is illogical to suggest that scientists in one field are somehow less able and and further down the food chain than others in a different field. It is illogical to accept everything that a medical scientist says, everything that a geologist says, everything that an astrophysicist says, everything that...you get the picture, but then when it comes to climate scientists, people like yourself compare them to a bunch of dropkicks not worth listening to.
You said earlier that 100% certainty doesn't exist in the human cause of climate change...a key reason for your continued Nothing To See Here attitude. I put it to you that regarding COVID-19, there is also not 100% certainty of anything, whether it be its origin and development, outcomes, treatment, cure, long term effects etc. Using your logic COVID-19 is not worth worrying about because there are unknowns! Yet you are fully on board!!!
Do I overestimate problems? I don't think so; I've never made wild predictions etc. regarding climate. Do you underestimate them? Regarding climate, by not thinking that climate change is worth dealing with, the answer is obvious.