That's exactly what I mean - a very specific circumstance. You're talking about trains being "stuck" inbetween Strathfield and Ashfield, a very small section of network. There are further sections without crossovers.Yes and it's the same reason the network is probably going to continue losing crossovers that are only essential under "very specific circumstances", including in the Strathfield area. No more lane changing. It is simpler and cheaper, but less flexible.
Edited 05 Jul 2013 12:50, 9 years ago, edited by MILW
That's exactly what I mean - a very specific circumstance. You're talking about trains being "stuck" inbetween Strathfield and Ashfield, a very small section of network. There are further sections without crossovers.Yes and it's the same reason the network is probably going to continue losing crossovers including in the Strathfield area. No more lane changing. It is simpler and cheaper, but less flexible.
Edited 04 Jul 2013 15:22, 9 years ago, edited by MILW
That's exactly what I mean - a very specific circumstance. You're talking about trains being "stuck" inbetween Strathfield and Ashfield, a very small section of network. There are further sections without crossovers.Yes and it's the same reason the network is going to continue losing crossovers including in the Strathfield area. No more lane changing. It is simpler and cheaper, but less flexible.
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2022 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.
Stats for nerds
Gen time: 0.7097s | RAM: 5.92kb