• Login to Railpage
  • Information
    • Lineside Locations
    • Liveries
    • Locomotives
    • Organisations
    • Railcams
    • Sightings
  • Correspondence
    • Forums
    • News Index
    • News Archive
    • Polls
  • Content
    • Photos
    • Photo competitions
    • Old gallery
    • Jobs
    • Downloads
    • Timetables
    • Links
    • Events Calendar
    • Rail Passes
    • Railpage Websites
  • Website
    • Ideas
    • Advanced Search
    • Statistics
    • Forums Statistics
    • Bookmarklets
    • Feedback
    • Copyright
    • Membership List
    • Platform Status
    • Donate
    • Twitter
  • Help
    • Glossary
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • Rules for Posting
    • Website Help & FAQ

Railpage

 

 
  • Home
  • Forums
  • The Lounge
  • The Ashes
    • About Railpage
    • Railpage Australia™
    • Help For Beginners
    • Locations
    • News
    • Australian Railway News
    • New South Wales
    • Sydney Suburban
    • Victoria
    • Melbourne suburban
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Tasmania
    • Western Australia
    • NT
    • ACT
    • Operators
    • Locomotives and Rolling Stock
    • Signalling and Infrastructure
    • Sightings
    • General
    • Australian Rail Employment
    • Trams and Light Rail
    • Simulator Forums
    • MSTS General Discussions
    • MSTS Routes
    • MSTS 3D
    • Trainz General Discussions
    • MetroMSTS Projects
    • MS Train Simulator X
    • Open Rails
    • BVE Trainsim
    • Train Simulator
    • Model Railways
    • Model Railways - General Discussions
    • Special Interest Groups
    • Australian Miniature Railways
    • Gheringhap Loop
    • Railway Archaeology
    • Railway Photography
    • Radio and Scanning Discussions
    • RTSA
    • Other Transport
    • The Bogies
    • Railway Preservation and Tourism
    • Preservation and Tourist Railways
    • International Railway News
    • International Discussion
    • General Forums
    • The Lounge
    • Test Forum
    • Armchair Operators
    • The Political Soapbox
    • Archived Threads
    djf01 posted 29 Jul 2013 00:53
    Posted in The Lounge » The Ashes

    Report sounds like bollocks

    Tour game not over yet.

    Lyon 26 overs @ 3.8 an over

    Agar 14 overs @ 4.7 an over

    1 wicket apiece

    Monty pick of the bowlers for the Poms in the first innings :D

    bingley hall

    You have to wonder about the standard of the opposition in those tour games too.  Everyone bar Wade made scores.  And S Smith got a hundred.  Need I say more?

    I was a bit disappointed Agar didn't get his hundred, and also thought it was unfortunate he got a few wickets in his first test.  He could have set even more records: not only being the first #11 to make a test century, he might have joined that rare club of players getting a hundred on debut, but a hundred in their *only* game!

    He showed at Lords what I think we could reasonably expect from any 19o kid lots of promise, but inexperience leading to soft dismissals and an inability to keep set batters under control.

    My likely 11 for the next game:

    1. Watson
    2. Rogers
    3. Hughes
    4. Clarke
    5. Smith
    6. Warner
    7. Haddin
    8. Siddle
    9. Harris
    10. Bird
    11. Lyon

    Game 4:

    1. Cowan
    2. Watson
    3. Kwaja
    4. Clarke
    5. Smith
    6. Warner
    7. Haddin
    8. Siddle
    9. Starc
    10. Lyon
    11. Bird

    Game 5:

    1. Cowan
    2. Warner
    3. Clarke
    4. Smith
    5. Watson
    6. Wade (vc)
    7. Agar
    8. Harris
    9. Starc
    10. Bird
    11. Lyon

    I think that just about gives everyone a run while still dropping everyone bar Clarke and Watson :-).  It should certainly avoid having any batter play more than 4 consecutive innings in the same position in the order!

    Edit history

    Edited 29 Jul 2013 00:53, 9 years ago, edited by djf01

    Report sounds like bollocks

    Tour game not over yet.

    Lyon 26 overs @ 3.8 an over

    Agar 14 overs @ 4.7 an over

    1 wicket apiece

    Monty pick of the bowlers for the Poms in the first innings :D

    bingley hall

    You have to wonder about the standard of the opposition in those tour games too.  Everyone bar Wade made scores.  And S Smith got a hundred.  Need I say more?

    I was a bit disappointed Agar didn't get his hundred, and also thought it was unfortunate he got a few wickets in his first test.  He could have set even more records: not only being the first #11 to make a test century, he might have joined that rare club of players getting a hundred on debut, but a hundred in their *only* game!

    He showed at Lords what I think we could reasonably expect from any 19o kid lots of promise, but inexperience leading to soft dismissals and an inability to keep set batters under control.

    My likely 11 for the next game:

    Watson
    Rogers
    Hughes
    Clarke
    Smith
    Warner
    Haddin
    Siddle
    Harris
    Bird
    Lyon

    Game 4:

    Cowan
    Watson
    Kwaja
    Clarke
    Smith
    Warner
    Haddin
    Siddle
    Starc
    Lyon
    Bird

    Game 5:

    Cowan
    Warner
    Clarke
    Smith
    Watson
    Wade (vc)
    Agar
    Harris
    Starc
    Bird
    Lyon

    I think that just about gives everyone a run while still dropping everyone bar Clarke and Watson :-).  It should certainly avoid having any batter play more than 4 consecutive innings in the same position in the order!

    About this website

    Railpage version 3.10.0.0037

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2022 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.

    You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.

    View mobile site

    Stats for nerds

    Gen time: 0.4707s | RAM: 5.82kb