• Login to Railpage
  • Information
    • Lineside Locations
    • Liveries
    • Locomotives
    • Organisations
    • Railcams
    • Sightings
  • Correspondence
    • Forums
    • News Index
    • News Archive
    • Polls
  • Content
    • Photos
    • Photo competitions
    • Old gallery
    • Jobs
    • Downloads
    • Timetables
    • Links
    • Events Calendar
    • Rail Passes
    • Railpage Websites
  • Website
    • Ideas
    • Advanced Search
    • Statistics
    • Forums Statistics
    • Bookmarklets
    • Feedback
    • Copyright
    • Membership List
    • Platform Status
    • Donate
    • Twitter
  • Help
    • Glossary
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • Rules for Posting
    • Website Help & FAQ

Railpage

 

 
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Locomotives and Rolling Stock
  • PL1 - Rest In Peace
    • About Railpage
    • Railpage Australia™
    • Help For Beginners
    • Locations
    • News
    • Australian Railway News
    • New South Wales
    • Sydney Suburban
    • Victoria
    • Melbourne suburban
    • Queensland
    • South Australia
    • Tasmania
    • Western Australia
    • NT
    • ACT
    • Operators
    • Locomotives and Rolling Stock
    • Signalling and Infrastructure
    • Sightings
    • General
    • Australian Rail Employment
    • Trams and Light Rail
    • Simulator Forums
    • MSTS General Discussions
    • MSTS Routes
    • MSTS 3D
    • Trainz General Discussions
    • MetroMSTS Projects
    • MS Train Simulator X
    • Open Rails
    • BVE Trainsim
    • Train Simulator
    • Model Railways
    • Model Railways - General Discussions
    • Special Interest Groups
    • Australian Miniature Railways
    • Gheringhap Loop
    • Railway Archaeology
    • Railway Photography
    • Radio and Scanning Discussions
    • RTSA
    • Other Transport
    • The Bogies
    • Railway Preservation and Tourism
    • Preservation and Tourist Railways
    • International Railway News
    • International Discussion
    • General Forums
    • The Lounge
    • Test Forum
    • Armchair Operators
    • The Political Soapbox
    • Archived Threads
    Alco_Haulic posted 04 Jul 2015 13:22
    Posted in Locomotives and Rolling Stock » PL1 - Rest In Peace

    The old NSWGR was very adept at throwing wads of good money at bad projects such as the PLs. Look, we have a couple old 73s, lets chuck some money at joining 2 together to make some sort of test car and then write it off after a short time. I can also think of the 621/721 rail inspection cars when purchasing new stock may have been cheaper and a more effecient use of scarce money resources. Hopefully, these days are gone. The PLs were really weird looking.
    nswtrains
    As Pressman has already noted, Australian National converted some 830 class to DA's for driver only shunting from the early 1990's. IIRC the first 3 reused the original cab, the first 2 with the original nose chopped down, and DA 3 featured a new nose and 2-piece windscreen (DA 1 & 2 used a 3-piece layout). While from DA4 onwards a new cab and nose was manufactured. The units were seemingly more successful than the PL rebuilds, as only one has been retired, and that was due to a bent frame resulting from a level crossing incident. The cab was later reused on another 830 to produce another DA style locomotive that ended up in WA.

    The PL-class had some potential as a way to improve forward vision of the 48-class on branchlines, however, I have heard there was a lot of resistance from drivers due to the lack of restroom facilities on the locomotives. And of course, a reduced number of brnachlines to operate. As for looks, the windscreen rake may have been different, but it had a certain charm compared to the brick looks of a 81 or NR.

    Edit history

    Edited 04 Jul 2015 13:23, 7 years ago, edited by Alco_Haulic

    The old NSWGR was very adept at throwing wads of good money at bad projects such as the PLs. Look, we have a couple old 73s, lets chuck some money at joining 2 together to make some sort of test car and then write it off after a short time. I can also think of the 621/721 rail inspection cars when purchasing new stock may have been cheaper and a more effecient use of scarce money resources. Hopefully, these days are gone. The PLs were really weird looking.
    nswtrains
    As Pressman has already noted, Australian National converted some 830 class to DA's for driver only shunting from the early 1990's. IIRC the first 3 reused the original cab, the first 2 with the original nose chopped down, and DA 3 featured a new nose and 2-piece windscreen (DA 1 & @ used a 3-piece layout). While from DA4 onwards a new cab and nose was manufactured. The units were seemingly more successful than the PL rebuilds, as only one has been retired, and that was due to a bent frame resulting from a level crossing incident. The cab was later reused on another 830 to produce another DA style locomotive that ended up in WA.

    The PL-class had some potential as a way to improve forward vision of the 48-class on branchlines, however, I have heard there was a lot of resistance from drivers due to the lack of restroom facilities on the locomotives. And of course, a reduced number of brnachlines to operate. As for looks, the windscreen rake may have been different, but it had a certain charm compared to the brick looks of a 81 or NR.

    About this website

    Railpage version 3.10.0.0037

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2022 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.

    You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.

    View mobile site

    Stats for nerds

    Gen time: 0.601s | RAM: 5.74kb