I have no idea how you've developed this idea that NSW is a Good Little Vegemiter without its hand out for cash.This is bound to stir up the Vic/NSW funding argument when Melbourne is growing faster than Sydney and more cash is going into network in Sydney than Melbourne.Name a Metro/Suburban/interurban commuter and regional passenger rail project in Sydney that was Fed funded in last 10-20 years?Assuming this is real and not purely designed to provoke discussion.
Push for PM to commit money to building $20b metro line to Sydney's west
Meanwhile the Vic RFR, promised hand outs for Geelong, what else.....hell you even want the Feds to fund the Airport line, something 3 other states started on their own.
Mel/Vic currently has the highest population growth, but 10 years ago it was BNE/Qld, with Syd/NSW in between. Who's to day it won't change, again!
"The NSW Treasurer wants more commonwealth cash for his state's big road, rail and airport projects."
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/nsw-wants-roads-rail-funding-from-budget
Drawing a semantic distinction about which modes have been funded and which have not makes no sense, because ultimately a rail dollar and a road dollar have the same budget impact. If the Feds fund a road for NSW, that gives them capital to build train lines - I would have though that's fairly obvious.
Although it represents only part of the federal infrastructure funding, from 2014 to 2017 NSW had $13.9b deposited under the NPA, while Victoria had only $8.5b.
A cynic might even suggest that the federal funding is directed to smaller projects so the NSW Government gets big ribbon-cutting opportunities all to itself.
Edit: here's a source that does the sums. Look at those graphs and tell me a) NSW is "self-funded" and b) Victoria is not being dudded in favour of Queensland and WA.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-14/fact-check-south-australia-infrastructure-funding/9537064
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-14/fact-check-south-australia-infrastructure-funding/9537064
Edited 04 Jun 2019 14:11, 2 years ago, edited by potatoinmymouth
I have no idea how you've developed this idea that NSW is a Good Little Vegemiter without its hand out for cash.This is bound to stir up the Vic/NSW funding argument when Melbourne is growing faster than Sydney and more cash is going into network in Sydney than Melbourne.Name a Metro/Suburban/interurban commuter and regional passenger rail project in Sydney that was Fed funded in last 10-20 years?Assuming this is real and not purely designed to provoke discussion.
Push for PM to commit money to building $20b metro line to Sydney's west
Meanwhile the Vic RFR, promised hand outs for Geelong, what else.....hell you even want the Feds to fund the Airport line, something 3 other states started on their own.
Mel/Vic currently has the highest population growth, but 10 years ago it was BNE/Qld, with Syd/NSW in between. Who's to day it won't change, again!
"The NSW Treasurer wants more commonwealth cash for his state's big road, rail and airport projects."
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/nsw-wants-roads-rail-funding-from-budget
Drawing a semantic distinction about which modes have been funded and which have not makes no sense, because ultimately a rail dollar and a road dollar have the same budget impact. If the Feds fund a road for NSW, that gives them capital to build train lines - I would have though that's fairly obvious.
Although it represents only part of the federal infrastructure funding, from 2014 to 2017 NSW had $13.9b deposited under the NPA, while Victoria had only $8.5b.
A cynic might even suggest that the federal funding is directed to smaller projects so the NSW Government gets big ribbon-cutting opportunities all to itself.
Edit: here's a source that does the sums. Look at those graphs and tell me a) NSW is "self-funded" and b) Victoria is not being dudded in favour of Queensland and WA.
Edited 04 Jun 2019 14:10, 2 years ago, edited by potatoinmymouth
I have no idea how you've developed this idea that NSW is a Good Little Vegemiter without its hand out for cash.This is bound to stir up the Vic/NSW funding argument when Melbourne is growing faster than Sydney and more cash is going into network in Sydney than Melbourne.Name a Metro/Suburban/interurban commuter and regional passenger rail project in Sydney that was Fed funded in last 10-20 years?Assuming this is real and not purely designed to provoke discussion.
Push for PM to commit money to building $20b metro line to Sydney's west
Meanwhile the Vic RFR, promised hand outs for Geelong, what else.....hell you even want the Feds to fund the Airport line, something 3 other states started on their own.
Mel/Vic currently has the highest population growth, but 10 years ago it was BNE/Qld, with Syd/NSW in between. Who's to day it won't change, again!
"The NSW Treasurer wants more commonwealth cash for his state's big road, rail and airport projects."
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/nsw-wants-roads-rail-funding-from-budget
Drawing a semantic distinction about which modes have been funded and which have not makes no sense, because ultimately a rail dollar and a road dollar have the same budget impact. If the Feds fund a road for NSW, that gives them capital to build train lines - I would have though that's fairly obvious.
Although it represents only part of the federal infrastructure funding, from 2014 to 2017 NSW had $13.9b deposited under the NPA, while Victoria had only $8.5b.
A cynic might even suggest that the federal funding is directed to smaller projects so the NSW Government gets big ribbon-cutting opportunities all to itself.
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2021 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.
Stats for nerds
Gen time: 0.6278s | RAM: 5.9kb