Community takes fight for rail to the Supreme Court
Rail corridor between Glenfield and Macarthur earmarked for medium density
Rail Trail boost to tourism - and local economy
Newcastle rail case may be long wait
Save Our Rail questions semantics argument over rail line cut
North West Rail Link corridor to extend through to Marsden Park
Camurra West to Weemelah Line Booked Out of Use
Rail Trail full steam ahead
John Holland Commissions Electronic Train Orders
Closure of Newcastle rail stations not technically a closure of whole line, State Government lawyer says
Australian governments love to boast about the amount of money they are setting aside for infrastructure projects, such as road building, but a new report questions whether taxpayers are getting value for money.
Treasurer Josh Frydenberg announced $15 billion in additional infrastructure commitments as part of the government's ongoing $110 billion, 10-year investment pipeline.
State governments have also pledged billions of dollars in road and transport projects.
But an analysis by the Grattan Institute think tank has found taxpayers end up paying too much for major projects because Australia's governments don't drive a hard bargain on contracts with big construction firms.
It estimates about 25 per cent of projects end up costing taxpayers more than governments expected when construction started.
In particular, Australia's transport infrastructure costs are above the global average.
"Our governments are getting major projects wrong, and taxpayers are left to pick up the tab," the institute's transport and cities program director Marion Terrill said.
"Governments should stop worrying about the profitability of the industry and start delivering quality services at the lowest long-term cost to the community."
She said competition was fundamental to get quality infrastructure at a sharp price.
But as the size of projects have grown, so has the size of contracts, and with larger contracts, competition inevitably thins.
Few Australian firms having the technical and financial capability to win contracts worth $1 billion or more, yet governments often give undue priority to domestic experience, making it hard for international firms to win contracts.
The report also says governments often rush projects to market so they can announce and start them before the next election.
But in the rush, governments don't always identify or mitigate expensive problems.
Among its recommendations, Grattan calls on governments to only sign contracts they are prepared to enforce, and to award all infrastructure contracts through an open tender process.
It also says Australian governments should investigate how similar countries overseas manage to build high-quality transport infrastructure at a lower cost.
This article first appeared on au.news.yahoo.com
About this website
Railpage version 3.10.0.0037
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest is © 2003-2021 Interactive Omnimedia Pty Ltd.
You can syndicate our news using one of the RSS feeds.